Literature DB >> 31747021

Pragmatic measures for implementation research: development of the Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale (PAPERS).

Cameo F Stanick1, Heather M Halko2, Elspeth A Nolen3, Byron J Powell4, Caitlin N Dorsey5, Kayne D Mettert5, Bryan J Weiner6, Melanie Barwick7, Luke Wolfenden8, Laura J Damschroder9, Cara C Lewis5.   

Abstract

The use of reliable, valid measures in implementation practice will remain limited without pragmatic measures. Previous research identified the need for pragmatic measures, though the characteristic identification used only expert opinion and literature review. Our team completed four studies to develop a stakeholder-driven pragmatic rating criteria for implementation measures. We published Studies 1 (identifying dimensions of the pragmatic construct) and 2 (clarifying the internal structure) that engaged stakeholders-participants in mental health provider and implementation settings-to identify 17 terms/phrases across four categories: Useful, Compatible, Acceptable, and Easy. This paper presents Studies 3 and 4: a Delphi to ascertain stakeholder-prioritized dimensions within a mental health context, and a pilot study applying the rating criteria. Stakeholders (N = 26) participated in a Delphi and rated the relevance of 17 terms/phrases to the pragmatic construct. The investigator team further defined and shortened the list, which were piloted with 60 implementation measures. The Delphi confirmed the importance of all pragmatic criteria, but provided little guidance on relative importance. The investigators removed or combined terms/phrases to obtain 11 criteria. The 6-point rating system assigned to each criterion demonstrated sufficient variability across items. The grey literature did not add critical information. This work produced the first stakeholder-driven rating criteria to assess whether measures are pragmatic. The Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale (PAPERS) combines the pragmatic criteria with psychometric rating criteria, from previous work. Use of PAPERS can inform development of implementation measures and to assess the quality of existing measures. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implementation science; Measurement; Pragmatic measure; Psychometric

Year:  2021        PMID: 31747021      PMCID: PMC7877299          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  13 in total

Review 1.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.

Authors:  F Hasson; S Keeney; H McKenna
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 2.  The Delphi technique: myths and realities.

Authors:  Catherine Powell
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Pragmatic measures: what they are and why we need them.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; William T Riley
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.

Authors:  M K Murphy; N A Black; D L Lamping; C M McKee; C F Sanderson; J Askham; T Marteau
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.

Authors:  Enola Proctor; Hiie Silmere; Ramesh Raghavan; Peter Hovmand; Greg Aarons; Alicia Bunger; Richard Griffey; Melissa Hensley
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2011-03

7.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Outcomes for implementation science: an enhanced systematic review of instruments using evidence-based rating criteria.

Authors:  Cara C Lewis; Sarah Fischer; Bryan J Weiner; Cameo Stanick; Mimi Kim; Ruben G Martinez
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 9.  Toward criteria for pragmatic measurement in implementation research and practice: a stakeholder-driven approach using concept mapping.

Authors:  Byron J Powell; Cameo F Stanick; Heather M Halko; Caitlin N Dorsey; Bryan J Weiner; Melanie A Barwick; Laura J Damschroder; Michel Wensing; Luke Wolfenden; Cara C Lewis
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  An updated protocol for a systematic review of implementation-related measures.

Authors:  Cara C Lewis; Kayne D Mettert; Caitlin N Dorsey; Ruben G Martinez; Bryan J Weiner; Elspeth Nolen; Cameo Stanick; Heather Halko; Byron J Powell
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-25
View more
  10 in total

1.  Selecting Outcomes to Ensure Pragmatic Trials Are Relevant to People Living with Dementia.

Authors:  Laura C Hanson; Antonia V Bennett; Mattias Jonsson; Amy Kelley; Christine Ritchie; Debra Saliba; Joan Teno; Sheryl Zimmerman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Research and Scholarly Methods: Implementation Science Studies.

Authors:  Grace M Kuo; Katy E Trinkley; Borsika Rabin
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Pharm       Date:  2022-06-24

3.  Therapist-Observer Concordance in Ratings of EBP Strategy Delivery: Challenges and Targeted Directions in Pursuing Pragmatic Measurement in Children's Mental Health Services.

Authors:  Lauren Brookman-Frazee; Nicole A Stadnick; Teresa Lind; Scott Roesch; Laura Terrones; Miya L Barnett; Jennifer Regan; Catherine A Kennedy; Ann F Garland; Anna S Lau
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2021-01

4.  Development of the ASSESS tool: a comprehenSive tool to Support rEporting and critical appraiSal of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods implementation reSearch outcomes.

Authors:  Nessa Ryan; Dorice Vieira; Joyce Gyamfi; Temitope Ojo; Donna Shelley; Olugbenga Ogedegbe; Juliet Iwelunmor; Emmanuel Peprah
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-03-28

Review 5.  The effectiveness of champions in implementing innovations in health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wilmer J Santos; Ian D Graham; Michelle Lalonde; Melissa Demery Varin; Janet E Squires
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-07-22

6.  Quantitative Measurements for Factors Influencing Implementation in School Settings: Protocol for A Systematic Review and A Psychometric and Pragmatic Analysis.

Authors:  Sara Hoy; Björg Helgadóttir; Åsa Norman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 7.  A citation analysis and scoping systematic review of the operationalization of the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM).

Authors:  Borsika A Rabin; Julie Cakici; Caitlin A Golden; Paul A Estabrooks; Russell E Glasgow; Bridget Gaglio
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 7.960

8.  A systematic review of school health policy measurement tools: implementation determinants and outcomes.

Authors:  Gabriella M McLoughlin; Peg Allen; Callie Walsh-Bailey; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-06-26

9.  Quantitative measures of health policy implementation determinants and outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peg Allen; Meagan Pilar; Callie Walsh-Bailey; Cole Hooley; Stephanie Mazzucca; Cara C Lewis; Kayne D Mettert; Caitlin N Dorsey; Jonathan Purtle; Maura M Kepper; Ana A Baumann; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 7.960

10.  The Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool: measuring organizational capacity to promote sustainability in healthcare.

Authors:  Sara Malone; Kim Prewitt; Rachel Hackett; John C Lin; Virginia McKay; Callie Walsh-Bailey; Douglas A Luke
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-07-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.