Literature DB >> 31746998

Opening the 'implementation black-box' of the user fee exemption policy for caesarean section in Benin: a realist evaluation.

Jean-Paul Dossou1,2, Vincent De Brouwere2, Sara Van Belle3,4, Bruno Marchal4,5.   

Abstract

To improve access to maternal health services, Benin introduced in 2009 a user fee exemption policy for caesarean sections. Similar to other low- and middle-income countries, its implementation showed mixed results. Our study aimed at understanding why and in which circumstances the implementation of this policy in hospitals succeeded or failed. We adopted the realist evaluation approach and tested the initial programme theory through a multiple embedded case study design. We selected two hospitals with contrastive outcomes. We used data from 52 semi-structured interviews, a patient exit survey, a costing study of caesarean section and an analysis of financial flows. In the analysis, we used the intervention-context-actor-mechanism-outcome configuration heuristic. We identified two main causal pathways. First, in the state-owned hospital, which has a public-oriented but administrative management system, and where citizens demand accountability through various channels, the implementation process was effective. In the non-state-owned hospital, managers were guided by organizational financial interests more than by the inherent social value of the policy, there was a perceived lack of enforcement and the implementation was poor. We found that trust, perceived coercion, adherence to policy goals, perceived financial incentives and fairness in their allocation drive compliance, persuasion, positive responses to incentives and self-efficacy at the operational level to generate the policy implementation outcomes. Compliance with the policy depended on enforcement by hierarchical authority and bottom-up pressure. Persuasion depended on the alignment of the policy with personal and organizational values. Incentives may determine the adoption if they influence the local stakeholder's revenue are trustworthy and perceived as fairly allocated. Failure to anticipate the differential responses of implementers will prevent the proper implementation of user fee exemption policies and similar universal health coverage reforms.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Public/private; evaluation; exemption mechanisms; health policy; hospitals; policy implementation; theory; user fees

Year:  2020        PMID: 31746998     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  4 in total

1.  A guide to systems-level, participatory, theory-informed implementation research in global health.

Authors:  Charlotte Hanlon; Saba Hinrichs-Kraples; Crick Lund; Jamie Murdoch; Tatiana Taylor Salisbury; Nadine Seward; Ruth Verhey; Rahul Shidhaye; Graham Thornicroft; Ricardo Araya; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-12

2.  Acceptability of family planning in a changing context in Uganda: a realist evaluation at two time points.

Authors:  Shari Krishnaratne; Jenna Hoyt; Jessie K Hamon; Angela Barbra Ariko; Carol Atayo; Job Morukileng; Nathaly Spilotros; Jayne Webster
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  How do participatory methods shape policy? Applying a realist approach to the formulation of a new tuberculosis policy in Georgia.

Authors:  Bruno Marchal; Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde; Lela Sulaberidze; Ivdity Chikovani; Maia Uchaneishvili; Natia Shengelia; Karin Diaconu; Anna Vassall; Akaki Zoidze; Ariadna Nebot Giralt; Sophie Witter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Using implementation science theories and frameworks in global health.

Authors:  Valéry Ridde; Dennis Pérez; Emilie Robert
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-04-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.