| Literature DB >> 31746565 |
Wan-Cai Xia1,2,3, Sheng-Nan Ji4, Bao-Ping Ren5, Xin-Ming He6, Tai Zhong6, Ali Krzton7, Yun Tang8, Da-Yong Li9.
Abstract
Individual dispersal trends, unquestionably important for species ecology and evolution, are affected by multiple factors. Understanding the factors that influence female dispersal strategies offers important insight into primate dispersal mechanisms and female choice. To investigate the proximate causes of dispersal in female Yunnan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti), we observed and analyzed nine years of detailed dispersal and demographic data from a population of R. bieti in Xiangguqing, Baimaxueshan Nature Reserve, Yunnan Province, China. Results showed that females who lived long-term in a one-male unit (OMU), without giving birth and with few or no relatives, were more likely to leave that OMU. In addition, an OMU led by an outgroup male and containing more female relatives was significantly more likely to be chosen for immigration. Conversely, greater male age, longer male tenure, and more potentially fertile females discouraged immigration into an OMU. These results suggest that reproduction, male quality, and kin cooperation play the largest roles in female Yunnan snub-nosed monkey dispersal.Entities:
Keywords: Adult female; Competition; Dispersal; Inbreeding; Kin cooperation; Rhinopithecus bieti
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31746565 PMCID: PMC6956726 DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2020.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zool Res ISSN: 2095-8137
Coding and description of variables used in binary logistic regression modelling
| Group | Variable type | Variable | Variable description |
| For abbreviations, see text. | |||
| Emigration Group | Reproduction | WB | Whether female has given birth in OMU (0: no, 1: yes) |
| HLB | Length of time female did not breed (after age four) | ||
| WOD | Whether offspring died within first year (0: no, 1: yes) | ||
| Female quality | FLT | Female length of tenure | |
| FA | Female age | ||
| Kin | NR1 | Number of relatives (mother, daughter, and sister) | |
| Immigration Group | Male quality | AM | New alpha male age |
| MT | New alpha male length of tenure | ||
| OGM | Outgroup male became alpha (0: no, 1: yes) | ||
| Competition | NFF | Number of potentially fertile females in new OMU | |
| NI | Total number of individuals in new OMU | ||
| Kin | NR2 | Number of relatives (mother, daughter, and sister) | |
Binary logistic regression modelling for female emigration and immigration
| Variable type | Variable | Binary logistic regression model | 95.0% CI for Exp(B) | ||||||||
| B | Wald | Exp(B) | Lower | Upper | |||||||
| For abbreviations, see text. B: Logistic coefficient; | |||||||||||
| Emigration | Reproduction | WB | –2.468 | 0.923 | 7.150 | 1 | 0.007** | 0.085 | 0.014 | 0.517 | |
| HLB | –0.022 | 0.055 | 0.156 | 1 | 0.693 | 0.979 | 0.879 | 1.090 | |||
| WOD | 0.051 | 1.226 | 0.002 | 1 | 0.967 | 1.053 | 0.950 | 11.638 | |||
| Female quality | FA | 0.021 | 0.012 | 2.993 | 1 | 0.084 | 1.021 | 0.997 | 1.046 | ||
| FLT | 0.79 | 0.036 | 4.971 | 1 | 0.026* | 1.083 | 1.010 | 1.161 | |||
| Kin | NR1 | –1.938 | 0.537 | 13.04 | 1 | < 0.001** | 0.144 | 0.050 | 0.412 | ||
| Intercept | –0.532 | 0.881 | 0.365 | 1 | 0.546 | 0.587 | – | – | |||
| Immigration | Male quality | AM | –0.036 | 0.018 | 3.838 | 1 | 0.049* | 0.965 | 1.001 | 1.079 | |
| MT | –0.106 | 0.037 | 8.009 | 1 | 0.005** | 0.900 | 0.836 | 0.968 | |||
| OGM | 2.048 | 0.710 | 8.314 | 1 | 0.004** | 7.7521 | 1.927 | 31.190 | |||
| Competition | NFF | –0.991 | 0.374 | 7.021 | 1 | 0.008** | 0.371 | 0.178 | 0.773 | ||
| NI | 0.090 | 0.181 | 0.250 | 1 | 0.617 | 1.095 | 0.768 | 1.560 | |||
| Kin | NR2 | 4.135 | 1.016 | 16.573 | 1 | < 0.001** | 62.503 | 8.536 | 457.662 | ||
| Intercept | 4.833 | 2.171 | 4.954 | 1 | 0.026* | 125.536 | – | – | |||