Ornella M Dubaz1, Samuel Wu2, Fernando Cubillos3, Guanhong Miao2, Tanya Simuni4. 1. Department of Neurology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA. 3. National Parkinson's Foundation Miami Florida USA. 4. Department of Neurology Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During the past decade, there has been increasing awareness of the side effects of dopamine agonists (DAs), including impulse control disorders. We hypothesized that there may be a shift toward more conservative use of DAs. OBJECTIVE: To explore the change in prescribing practices for dopaminergic medications in Parkinson's disease between 2010 and 2017. METHODS: Data were collected from the Parkinson's Foundation Quality Improvement Initiative registry. Baseline characteristics were compared between the 2010 and 2017 cohorts using chi-squared tests for discrete and t tests for continuous variables. Logistic regressions were conducted for each class of medications to assess the effect of time points (2010 vs. 2017) and prespecified covariates on the probability of prescribing. RESULTS: A total of 2,717 participants from 2010 and 2,900 participants from 2017 were included in the analysis. Mean (standard deviation) age was 67.4 (10) and 68.7 (9.3) for the 2010 and 2017 cohorts, respectively (P < 0.0001). After controlling for baseline characteristics, DA use was unchanged (P = 0.1172). The odds of using monoamine oxidase B inhibitors was 52% higher in 2017 than in 2010 (P < 0.0001), 38% lower for catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors (P < 0.0001), 25% lower for amantadine (P < 0.0001), and 31% lower for anticholinergics (P = 0.0153). There was no difference in the utilization of levodopa in the 2 cohorts (86.1% vs. 86.2%; P = 0.5783). CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing awareness of impulse control disorders, there has been no reduction in the use of DAs during the past decade. Overall, there is less utilization of adjunctive classes of drugs except for an increase in the use of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors.
BACKGROUND: During the past decade, there has been increasing awareness of the side effects of dopamine agonists (DAs), including impulse control disorders. We hypothesized that there may be a shift toward more conservative use of DAs. OBJECTIVE: To explore the change in prescribing practices for dopaminergic medications in Parkinson's disease between 2010 and 2017. METHODS: Data were collected from the Parkinson's Foundation Quality Improvement Initiative registry. Baseline characteristics were compared between the 2010 and 2017 cohorts using chi-squared tests for discrete and t tests for continuous variables. Logistic regressions were conducted for each class of medications to assess the effect of time points (2010 vs. 2017) and prespecified covariates on the probability of prescribing. RESULTS: A total of 2,717 participants from 2010 and 2,900 participants from 2017 were included in the analysis. Mean (standard deviation) age was 67.4 (10) and 68.7 (9.3) for the 2010 and 2017 cohorts, respectively (P < 0.0001). After controlling for baseline characteristics, DA use was unchanged (P = 0.1172). The odds of using monoamine oxidase B inhibitors was 52% higher in 2017 than in 2010 (P < 0.0001), 38% lower for catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors (P < 0.0001), 25% lower for amantadine (P < 0.0001), and 31% lower for anticholinergics (P = 0.0153). There was no difference in the utilization of levodopa in the 2 cohorts (86.1% vs. 86.2%; P = 0.5783). CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing awareness of impulse control disorders, there has been no reduction in the use of DAs during the past decade. Overall, there is less utilization of adjunctive classes of drugs except for an increase in the use of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors.
Authors: Constant V M Verschuur; Sven R Suwijn; Judith A Boel; Bart Post; Bas R Bloem; Johannes J van Hilten; Teus van Laar; Gerrit Tissingh; Alexander G Munts; Guenther Deuschl; Anthony E Lang; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Rob J de Haan; Rob M A de Bie Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stanley Fahn; David Oakes; Ira Shoulson; Karl Kieburtz; Alice Rudolph; Anthony Lang; C Warren Olanow; Caroline Tanner; Kenneth Marek Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael S Okun; Andrew Siderowf; John G Nutt; Gerald T O'Conner; Bastiaan R Bloem; Elaine M Olmstead; Mark Guttman; Tanya Simuni; Eric Cheng; Elaine V Cohen; Sotirios Parashos; Laura Marsh; Irene A Malaty; Nir Giladi; Peter Schmidt; Joyce Oberdorf Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: James A G Crispo; Allison W Willis; Dylan P Thibault; Yannick Fortin; Harlen D Hays; Douglas S McNair; Lise M Bjerre; Dafna E Kohen; Santiago Perez-Lloret; Donald R Mattison; Daniel Krewski Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: A Antonini; K R Chaudhuri; B Boroojerdi; M Asgharnejad; L Bauer; F Grieger; D Weintraub Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Matthew J Barrett; Lana Sargent; Huma Nawaz; Daniel Weintraub; Elvin T Price; Allison W Willis Journal: Mov Disord Clin Pract Date: 2021-10-08
Authors: Shermyn Neo; Sheng Yong Aidan Wong; Hwee Lan Ng; Wei Li; Kay Yaw Tay; Wing Lok Au; Louis Chew Seng Tan Journal: Parkinsons Dis Date: 2020-03-30