OBJECTIVES: Schools are thought to have an important impact on adolescent behaviors, but the mechanisms are not well understood. We hypothesize that there are measurable constructs of peer- and teacher-related extrinsic motivations for adolescent behaviors and sought to develop measures of school culture that would capture these constructs. METHODS: We developed several survey items to assess school behavioral culture and collected self-reported data from a sample of adolescents age 14-17 attending high school in low income neighborhoods of Los Angeles. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to inform the creation of simple-summated multi-item scales. We also conducted a cultural consensus analysis to identify the existence of shared pattern of responses to the items among respondents within the same school. RESULTS: From 1159 adolescents, six factors were identified: social culture regarding popular (Cronbach's alpha=0.84) and respected (alpha=0.83) behaviors, teacher support (alpha=0.86) and monitoring of school rules (alpha=0.85), valued student traits (alpha=0.67) and school order (alpha=0.68). Cultural consensus analysis identified a shared pattern of responses to the items among respondents at 8 of the 13 schools. School academic performance, which is based on standardized test results, is strongly correlated with social culture regarding popular behaviors (Pearson's correlation coefficient r=0.64), monitoring of school rules (r= 0.71), and school order (r= 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses did not support a single, overall factor that measures school culture. However, the six identified sub-scales might be used individually to examine school influence on academic performance and health behaviors.
OBJECTIVES: Schools are thought to have an important impact on adolescent behaviors, but the mechanisms are not well understood. We hypothesize that there are measurable constructs of peer- and teacher-related extrinsic motivations for adolescent behaviors and sought to develop measures of school culture that would capture these constructs. METHODS: We developed several survey items to assess school behavioral culture and collected self-reported data from a sample of adolescents age 14-17 attending high school in low income neighborhoods of Los Angeles. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to inform the creation of simple-summated multi-item scales. We also conducted a cultural consensus analysis to identify the existence of shared pattern of responses to the items among respondents within the same school. RESULTS: From 1159 adolescents, six factors were identified: social culture regarding popular (Cronbach's alpha=0.84) and respected (alpha=0.83) behaviors, teacher support (alpha=0.86) and monitoring of school rules (alpha=0.85), valued student traits (alpha=0.67) and school order (alpha=0.68). Cultural consensus analysis identified a shared pattern of responses to the items among respondents at 8 of the 13 schools. School academic performance, which is based on standardized test results, is strongly correlated with social culture regarding popular behaviors (Pearson's correlation coefficient r=0.64), monitoring of school rules (r= 0.71), and school order (r= 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses did not support a single, overall factor that measures school culture. However, the six identified sub-scales might be used individually to examine school influence on academic performance and health behaviors.
Entities:
Keywords:
School culture; academic performance; behavioral economics; risky behaviors; social networks
Authors: Joan S Tucker; Kayla de la Haye; David P Kennedy; Harold D Green; Michael S Pollard Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Katherine M Keyes; John E Schulenberg; Patrick M O'Malley; Lloyd D Johnston; Jerald G Bachman; Guohua Li; Deborah Hasin Journal: Addiction Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Braden K Mogler; Suzanne B Shu; Craig R Fox; Noah J Goldstein; Ronald G Victor; José J Escarce; Martin F Shapiro Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lourdes R Guerrero; Rebecca Dudovitz; Paul J Chung; Kulwant K Dosanjh; Mitchell D Wong Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Rebecca N Dudovitz; Paul J Chung; Sarah Reber; David Kennedy; Joan S Tucker; Steve Shoptaw; Kulwant K Dosanjh; Mitchell D Wong Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Mitchell D Wong; Kulwant K Dosanjh; Nicholas J Jackson; Dennis Rünger; Rebecca N Dudovitz Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 3.295