Literature DB >> 31744886

Mainstreamed genetic testing in ovarian cancer: patient experience of the testing process.

Laura McLeavy1, Belinda Rahman1, Rebecca Kristeleit2, Jonathan Ledermann2, Michelle Lockley2,3, Mary McCormack2, Tim Mould2, Lucy Side4, Anne Lanceley5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pathogenic BRCA variants account for 5.8-24.8% of ovarian cancers. The identification of such a variant can have a significant impact on the affected individual and their relatives, determining eligibility for targeted therapies, predicting treatment response, and granting access to disease prevention strategies. Cancer services are responding to the increased demand for genetic testing with the introduction of mainstreamed genetic testing via oncology clinics. This study aimed to evaluate patient experience of the mainstreamed genetic testing pathway at a tertiary referral center in London, UK.
METHODS: Study participants were patients diagnosed with high-grade non-mucinous ovarian cancer, tested via a mainstreamed genetic testing pathway at the tertiary referral center between February 2015 and June 2017. Eligible participants were invited to complete the retrospective study questionnaire. Five quantitative measures with additional free-text items were used to evaluate the patient experience of mainstreamed genetic testing.
RESULTS: The tertiary referral center tested 170 ovarian cancer patients. Twenty-three pathogenic BRCA mutations were identified (23/170, 13.5%). One-hundred and six patients (106/170, 62.4%) met the study inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine of those invited to participate (29/106, 27.4%) returned the retrospective study questionnaire. Pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants were identified within four respondents (4/29, 13.8%). Motivations for genetic testing related to improved medical management, and the ability to provide relatives with genetic information. Participants did not appear to be adversely affected by result disclosure post-mainstreamed genetic testing. Two individuals with a pathogenic variant reported that the support provided by the tertiary referral center post-result disclosure could have been improved.
CONCLUSION: Results of the current study support further psychosocial research into the expansion of the mainstreamed genetic testing pathway. The results, although promising, have also highlighted the importance of genetic awareness within the multi-disciplinary team and the provision of timely psychological support from genetic specialists. © IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ovarian cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31744886     DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  6 in total

1.  Patient Experience with a Gynecologic Oncology-Initiated Genetic Testing Model for Women with Tubo-Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Michaela Bercovitch Sadinsky; Joanne Power; Enza Ambrosio; Laura Palma; Xing Zeng; William D Foulkes; Evan Weber
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 2.  Challenges of Genomic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancers.

Authors:  Lindsey McAlarnen; Kristen Stearns; Denise Uyar
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2021-01-14

Review 3.  The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kyra Bokkers; Michiel Vlaming; Ellen G Engelhardt; Ronald P Zweemer; Inge M van Oort; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Eveline M A Bleiker; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Informed consent practices for exome sequencing: An interview study with clinical geneticists in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Wendy Bos; Eline M Bunnik
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.183

5.  Positive experiences of healthcare professionals with a mainstreaming approach of germline genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kyra Bokkers; Ronald P Zweemer; Marco J Koudijs; Sanne Stehouwer; Mary E Velthuizen; Eveline M A Bleiker; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.446

6.  Mainstream genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer provides a solid basis for patients to make a well-informed decision about genetic testing.

Authors:  Kyra Bokkers; Eveline M A Bleiker; Jacob P Hoogendam; Mary E Velthuizen; Henk W R Schreuder; Cornelis G Gerestein; Joost G Lange; Jacqueline A Louwers; Marco J Koudijs; Margreet G E M Ausems; Ronald P Zweemer
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.164

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.