| Literature DB >> 31744543 |
Ju Young Kim1,2,3, Dong Hun Lee1,2, Joo Kyung Kim1,2, Hong Seo Choi1, Bhakti Dwivedi4, Manali Rupji4, Jeanne Kowalski4,5,6, Stefan J Green7, Heesang Song1,8, Won Jong Park1, Ji Young Chang1, Tae Min Kim9, Changwon Park10,11,12,13.
Abstract
Previous studies including ours have demonstrated a critical function of the transcription factor ETV2 (ets variant 2; also known as ER71) in determining the fate of cardiovascular lineage development. However, the underlying mechanisms of ETV2 function remain largely unknown. In this study, we demonstrated the novel function of the miR (micro RNA)-126-MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathway in ETV2-mediated FLK1 (fetal liver kinase 1; also known as VEGFR2)+ cell generation from the mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). By performing a series of experiments including miRNA sequencing and ChIP (chromatin immunoprecipitation)-PCR, we found that miR-126 is directly induced by ETV2. Further, we identified that miR-126 can positively regulate the generation of FLK1+ cells by activating the MAPK pathway through targeting SPRED1 (sprouty-related EVH1 domain containing 1). Further, we showed evidence that JUN/FOS activate the enhancer region of FLK1 through AP1 (activator protein 1) binding sequences. Our findings provide insight into the novel molecular mechanisms of ETV2 function in regulating cardiovascular lineage development from mESCs.Entities:
Keywords: EGFL7; ETV2/ER71; Embryonic stem cells; FLK1+ cells; miR-126
Year: 2019 PMID: 31744543 PMCID: PMC6862833 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-019-1466-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Fig. 1Analysis of ETV2-regualted miRNA expression in FLK1+ cells. a Schematic diagram of miRNA sequencing experiment. Doxycycline-inducible (iFLAG-ETV2) mESCs were differentiated, treated with ± Doxycycline (Dox) at day 1 and sorted for FLK1+ cells at day 3.5. RNAs from the sorted cells were subjected to miRNA sequencing and analysis. b Volcano plot showing the log2 fold change between +Dox versus −Dox against the −log10 FDR-adjusted p value for each miRNA. miRNAs (FDR ≤ 0.05) with fold change of ≥ 1.5 (in red; upregulated) and ≤ − 1.5 (in green; downregulated) were highlighted and selected. c Heatmap of the selected miRNAs in response to overexpression of ETV2. miRNAs upregulated and downregulated in +DOX were indicated with gray and black bars, respectively. d Gene Ontology (GO) categories of selected miRNAs by DIANA miRpath analysis. Bars indicate the significance level of miRNA target genes and interactions. e Differentiated iFLAG-ETV2 mESCs at day 3.5 were subjected to qRT-PCR analysis. n = 3, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 2ETV2 upregulates miR126 expression through direct binding on Egfl7 promoter. a Expression analysis. iFLAG-ETV2 mESCs were differentiated for 3.5 days ± Dox treatment and were subjected to gene expression analysis. n = 3, *p < 0.05. b Schematic diagram of Egfl7 promoter-luciferase plasmid. Two potential ETS binding elements were marked as diamonds, and their mutant sequences were shown in the bottom. c HEK/293T cells were transiently co-transfected with pCMV-Etv2 and pGL3-luciferase constructs carrying wild type (Wt), or mutants of Egfl7 promoter. Firefly luciferase activity was normalized by Renilla luciferase activity. n = 3. ***p < 0.001. d iFLAG-ETV2 mESCs were differentiated in the presence of Dox for 3.5 days and then subjected to ChIP-PCR assay. Rabbit anti-FLAG or IgG antibody was used for the immunoprecipitation. n = 3, **p < 0.01
Fig. 3ETV2 increases FLK1+ cells through the miR-126/MAPK pathway. A, B iFLAG-ETV2 mESCs were differentiated with ± Dox for 3.5 days and subjected to western blot analysis for SPRED1 (A) and phosphorylated ERK1/2 (B). β-ACTIN and ERK1/2 were used as loading controls. (A’, B’) The relative protein expression of SPRED1 and p-ERK1/2 was normalized against β-ACTIN and total ERK1/2, respectively. Differentiated Etv2 mESCs were also included for the analysis. n = 3, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (C) iFLAG-ETV2 mESCs were differentiated for 4 days in serum-free (upper) or for 3.5 days in serum (lower) conditions in the presence or absence of Dox. The resulting cells were analyzed for FLK1 expression by flow cytometry. U0126 (5 μM) or U0124 (5 μM) was treated during the differentiation. C’ Quantification. n = 3, *p < 0.05. D Differentiated iFLAG-ETV2, iFLAG-ETV2-MAP2K1-8E (iFLAG-ETV2-M) or iFLAG-ETV2-SPRED1 (iFLAG-ETV2-S) mESC ± Dox were analyzed for FLK1 expression by flow cytometry. D’ Quantification. n = 3, *p < 0.05
Fig. 4ETV2 activates FLK1 expression through AP-1 binding sites in Flk1 enhancer region. a Schematic diagram of Flk1-promoter-enhancer (p/e)-luciferase plasmid. Three potential AP-1 binding elements were marked as diamonds. b, c Luciferase-based promoter assay. b pGL3-Flk1 p/e was transiently co-transfected with pCMV-Etv2, pMCL-MAP2K1-8E, pCMV-c-Jun ND (dominant negative form of c-Jun) into HEK/293T cells. n = 3, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. c pGL3-luciferase construct carrying wild type (Wt), putative AP-1 binding site mutants (Mt #1, Mt #2, Mt #3) or enhancer deletion mutant (del) of Flk1 p/e was co-transfected with pCMV-c-Jun and c-Fos into HEK/293T cells. Firefly luciferase activity was normalized by Renilla luciferase activity. n = 3, ***p < 0.001. d A working model for ETV2-miR126/MAPK in regulating FLK1 expression. In addition to the direct binding of ETV2 on the ETS binding sites in FLK1 gene, ETV2 activates miR-126, which can target SPRED1, thereby activating the MAPK pathway. JUN/FOS, a downstream signaling complex of the MAPK pathway, subsequently activates gene transcription of FLK1 via the AP1 binding sites