| Literature DB >> 31744194 |
Li Xu1, Qingshan Jiang1, David R Lairson2.
Abstract
Previous studies which have shown the existence of gender disparities in hypertension risks often failed to take into account the participants' spatial and temporal information. In this study, we explored the spatio-temporal variation for gender-specific hypertension risks in not only single-disease settings but also multiple-disease settings. From the longitudinal data of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS), 70,374 records of 21,006 individuals aged 12 years and over were selected for this study. Bayesian B-spline techniques along with the Besag, York, and Mollie (BYM) model and the Shared Component Model (SCM) model were then used to construct the spatio-temporal models. Our study found that the prevalence of hypertension in China increased from 11.7% to 34.5% during 1991 and 2015, with a higher rate in males than that in females. Moreover, hypertension was found mainly clustered in spatially adjacent regions, with a significant high-risk pattern in Eastern and Central China while a low-risk pattern in Western China, especially for males. The spatio-temporal variation of hypertension risks was associated with regional covariates, such as age, overweight, alcohol consumption, and smoking, with similar effects of age shared by both genders whereas gender-specific effects for other covariates. Thus, gender-specific hypertension prevention and control should be emphasized in the future in China, especially for the elderly population, overweight population, and females with a history of alcohol consumption and smoking who live in Eastern China and Central China.Entities:
Keywords: Besag, York, and Mollie (BYM); China; Shared Component Model (SCM); hypertension; spatio-temporal variation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31744194 PMCID: PMC6888411 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16224545
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Sample distribution of participants.
| Variable | Value | Unit | Full Survey | Selected Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | % | 49.0 | 47.5 |
| % | 51.0 | 52.5 | ||
| Urban | Rural | % | 66.4 | 67.5 |
| % | 33.6 | 32.5 |
Figure 1The Administrative Map of Study Areas.
Figure 2Hypertension prevalence during 1991 to 2015.
Figure 3Area-specific hypertension prevalence (male).
Figure 4Area-specific hypertension prevalence (female).
Global cluster for hypertension prevalence by gender.
| Year | Moran’s | Moran’s | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | −0.159 | 0.466 | 0.166 | 0.161 |
| 1993 | 0.074 | 0.204 | 0.273 * | 0.091 |
| 1997 | 0.763 *** | 0.003 | 0.508 ** | 0.022 |
| 2000 | 0.258 | 0.143 | 0.072 | 0.242 |
| 2004 | 0.775 *** | 0.002 | 0.526 ** | 0.011 |
| 2006 | 0.500 ** | 0.041 | 0.604 ** | 0.039 |
| 2009 | 0.442 * | 0.053 | 0.427 ** | 0.015 |
| 2011 | 0.508 *** | 0.010 | 0.562 ** | 0.029 |
| 2015 | 0.658 ** | 0.032 | 0.530 ** | 0.029 |
Note: *, **, and *** correspond to the statistical significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively.
Comparison of spatio-temporal BYM and SCM models.
| Model setting | Model | Dbar | pD | DIC | Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One knot | BYM: B1 for male, B1F for female | 1383.6 | 47.0 | 1430.6 | 424 |
| One knot | SCM: B3S |
|
|
|
|
| Two knots | BYM: C2 for male, C2F for female |
|
|
|
|
| Two knots | SCM: C2S | 1155.0 | 32.7 | 1188.0 | 274 |
| Three knots | BYM: D2 for male, D1F for female |
|
|
|
|
| Three knots | SCM: E1S | 1336.0 | 33.1 | 1369.0 | 306 |
Note: All models correspond to that of Supplementary Tables S1 and S2.
Figure 5Posterior means of hypertension risk derived from the spatio-temporal Besag, York, and Mollie (BYM) model.
Figure 6Posterior means of hypertension risk derived from the spatio-temporal Shared Component Model (SCM) model.
Figure 7Overall shared and gender-specific variation derived from the spatio-temporal SCM model.
Figure 8Weight parameter δ over time (posterior median and 95% CI).
Figure 9Gender-specific temporal effects (j = 1 for male; j = 2 for female).
Figure 10Autocorrelation of b, b, S, and β.
Figure 11Convergence of b, b, S, and β.
Sensitivity analysis with respect to precision parameter τ.
| Parameter | Priors 1 | Priors 2 | Priors 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (95%CI) | Mean (95%CI) | Mean (95%CI) | |
|
| |||
| b1(Males) | 0.706 (0.645–0.772) | 0.706 (0.645–0.773) | 0.704 (0.641–0.770) |
| b2(Females) | 0.986 (0.927–1.048) | 0.990 (0.930–1.051) | 0.990 (0.930–1.051) |
|
| 1.161 (0.978–1.386) | 1.201 (0.948–1.519) | 1.206 (0.953–1.530) |
|
| |||
| Males | 0.917 (0.855–0.983) | 0.916 (0.855–0.982) | 0.917 (0.853–0.982) |
| Females | 0.999 (0.966–1.034) | 0.999 (0.966–1.033) | 0.999 (0.966–1.034) |
| DIC (pD) | DIC = 1369 (pD = 33.12) | DIC = 1477 (pD = 25.97) | DIC = 1343 (pD = 19.13) |
Deviance information criterion (DIC), priors 1: τβ~gamma (5.0,5.0 × 10−4); priors 2: σβ~unif(0,1); priors 3: σ2β~norm(0.0,100)I(0,). For brevity, this table mainly presents the results of sensitivity for RR.b, RR.β, and RR.Sj when t = 1 and region i = 2, other results can be obtained upon request.
Spatio-temporal BYM model selection.
| Model | Model Features | Dbar | pD | DIC | Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Knot at 1997, with spatio-temporal interaction terms | 802.5 | −31.5 | 739.5 | 270 |
| A2 | Knot at 1997, without spatio-temporal interaction terms | 866.6 | 4.87 | 871.5 | 175 |
| B1 | Knot at 2004, with spatio-temporal interaction terms | 725.6 | 24.0 | 749.6 | 195 |
| B2 | Knot at 2004, without spatio-temporal interaction terms | 821.2 | 14.8 | 836.0 | 164 |
| C1 | Knots at 1997 and 2004, with spatio-temporal interaction terms | 512.5 | −33.52 | 479.0 | 261 |
| C2 | Knots at 1997 and 2004, without spatio-temporal interaction terms | 542.6 | 5.62 | 548.3 | 218 |
| C3 | Knots at 2004 and 2011, with spatio-temporal interaction terms | 653.3 | 17.5 | 670.7 | 256 |
| C4 | Knots at 2004 and 2011, without spatio-temporal interaction terms | 721.0 | −7.7 | 713.3 | 215 |
| D1 | Knots at 1997, 2004, and 2011, with spatio-temporal interaction terms | 475.0 | 7.8 | 482.8 | 298 |
| D2 | Knots at 1997, 2004, and 2011, without spatio-temporal interaction terms |
|
|
|
|
| A1F | Knot at 1997, with spatio-temporal interaction terms | 693.8 | −4.4 × 1013 | −4.4 × 1013 | 193 |
| A2F | Knot at 1997, without spatio-temporal interaction terms | 800.2 | 21.8 | 821.9 | 179 |
| B1F | Knot at 2004, with spatio-temporal interaction terms | 658.0 | 23.0 | 681.0 | 229 |
| B2F | Knot at 2004, without spatio-temporal interaction terms | 756.4 | 0.7 | 757.0 | 153 |
| C1F | Knots at 1997 and 2004, with spatio-temporal interaction terms | 477.9 | −17.6 | 460.3 | 250 |
| C2F | Knots at 1997 and 2004, without spatio-temporal interaction terms | 559.0 | 20.5 | 579.4 | 211 |
| C3F | Knots at 2004 and 2011, with spatio-temporal interaction terms | 600.9 | −7.4 | 593.5 | 385 |
| C4F | Knots at 2004 and 2011, without spatio-temporal interaction terms | 685.9 | −5.9 | 680.0 | 257 |
| D1F | Knots at 1997, 2004, and 2011, with spatio-temporal interaction terms |
|
|
|
|
| D2F | Knots at 1997, 2004, and 2011, without spatio-temporal interaction terms | 504.4 | −0.2 | 504.3 | 338 |
Note: Model A~D for male; Model AF~DF for female. Negative value implies improper model.
Spatio-temporal SCM model selection.
| Model | Model Features | Dbar | pD | DIC | Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1S | Knot at 1997, with RS0i(t), common interaction terms | 1364.0 | −582.7 | 781.8 | 490 |
| A2S | Knot at 1997, with RS0i(t), gender specific interaction terms | 1629.0 | 14.3 | 1644.0 | 356 |
| A3S | Knot at 1997, without RS0i(t), common interaction terms | 1398.0 | −45.4 | 1353.0 | 311 |
| A4S | Knot at 1997, without RS0i(t), gender specific interaction terms | 1604.0 | 16.4 | 1620.0 | 176 |
| B1S | Knot at 2004, with RS0i(t), common interaction terms | 1351.0 | −548.0 | 803.2 | 471 |
| B2S | Knot at 2004, with RS0i(t), gender specific interaction terms | 1612.0 | −11.0 | 1601.0 | 332 |
| B3S | Knot at 2004, without RS0i(t), common interaction terms | 1384.0 | 5.3 | 1389.0 | 289 |
| B4S | Knot at 2004, without RS0i(t), gender specific interaction terms | 1589.0 | −36.1 | 1553.0 | 179 |
| C1S | Knot at 1997 and 2004, gender specific interaction terms | 1361.0 | 6.8 | 1368.0 | 186 |
| C2S | Knot at 1997 and 2004, common interaction terms | 1155 | 32.7 | 1188 | 274 |
| D1S | Knot at 1997 and 2004, gender specific interaction terms | 1529.0 | −3.5 | 1526.0 | 185 |
| D2S | Knot at 1997 and 2004, common interaction terms | 1321 | 27.9 | 1349 | 285 |
| E1S | Knot at 1997, 2004, and 2011, gender specific interaction terms |
|
|
|
|
| E2S | Knot at 1997, 2004, and 2011, common interaction terms | 1131.0 | −8.7 | 1122.0 | 355 |