Ulf Krister Hofmann1, Ramona Luise Keller1,2, Maximilian von Bernstorff1,3, Christian Walter1, Falk Mittag1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany. 2. Faculty of Medicine, Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg, D-97080 Würzburg, Germany. 3. Faculty of Medicine, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous classification systems have been proposed to interpret lumbar MRI scans. The clinical impact of the measured parameters remains unclear. To evaluate the clinical significance of imaging results in patients with multisegmental degenerative pathologies, treating specialists can perform image-guided local injections to target defined areas such as the epidural space. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the correlation between lumbar spinal stenosis measurements obtained by MRI and improvement obtained through local epidural injection. METHODS: In this retrospective study various measurement and classification systems for lumbar spinal stenosis were applied to MRI scans of 100 patients with this pathological condition. The reported effect of epidural bupivacaine/triamcinolone injections at the site was recorded in these patients and a comparative analysis performed. RESULTS: MRI features assessed in this study did not show any relevant correlation with reported pain relief after epidural injection in patients with chronic lumbar stenosis, with the exception of posterior disc height with a weak Kendall's tau of -0.187 (p= 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Although MRI is crucial for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis, it cannot replace but is rather complementary to a good patient history and clinical examination or the results of local diagnostic injections.
BACKGROUND: Numerous classification systems have been proposed to interpret lumbar MRI scans. The clinical impact of the measured parameters remains unclear. To evaluate the clinical significance of imaging results in patients with multisegmental degenerative pathologies, treating specialists can perform image-guided local injections to target defined areas such as the epidural space. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the correlation between lumbar spinal stenosis measurements obtained by MRI and improvement obtained through local epidural injection. METHODS: In this retrospective study various measurement and classification systems for lumbar spinal stenosis were applied to MRI scans of 100 patients with this pathological condition. The reported effect of epidural bupivacaine/triamcinolone injections at the site was recorded in these patients and a comparative analysis performed. RESULTS: MRI features assessed in this study did not show any relevant correlation with reported pain relief after epidural injection in patients with chronic lumbar stenosis, with the exception of posterior disc height with a weak Kendall's tau of -0.187 (p= 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Although MRI is crucial for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis, it cannot replace but is rather complementary to a good patient history and clinical examination or the results of local diagnostic injections.