Anna F Dawson1, William W Brown2, Joanna Anderson1, Bella Datta3, James N Donald4, Karen Hong5, Sophie Allan6, Tom B Mole7, Peter B Jones1, Julieta Galante1. 1. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 2. Harvard University, Boston, USA. 3. Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hatfield, UK. 4. University of Sydney Business School, Sydney, Australia. 5. Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St Louis, USA. 6. University of East Anglia and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK. 7. Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Fulbourn, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: University students are expressing an increased need for mental health support. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are being integrated into university stress-reduction programmes globally. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing MBI effects on university students' mental and physical health. METHODS: We searched nine databases, including grey literature and trial registries. Two independent reviewers extracted data following a prospective public protocol. RESULTS: Fifty-one RCTs were included. In comparison with passive controls, and when measured shortly after intervention completion, MBIs improve distress, anxiety, depression, well-being, rumination, and mindfulness with small to moderate effect sizes, with no benefit found for blood pressure, sleep, life satisfaction, resilience, worry, and thought suppression. Evidence for self-compassion is inconclusive. Effects last beyond three months for distress and mindfulness, with no data on other outcomes. Compared with active control groups, MBIs significantly improve distress and state anxiety, but not mindfulness, depression, well-being, affect, trait anxiety, or emotion regulation. Results were robust to adjustment for multiple testing, but RCTs' risk of bias is generally high. Moderator analyses did not find differential intervention effects according to intervention duration, delivery mode, or sub-populations. CONCLUSIONS: MBIs may be helpful to students but higher-quality research is needed.
BACKGROUND: University students are expressing an increased need for mental health support. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are being integrated into university stress-reduction programmes globally. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing MBI effects on university students' mental and physical health. METHODS: We searched nine databases, including grey literature and trial registries. Two independent reviewers extracted data following a prospective public protocol. RESULTS: Fifty-one RCTs were included. In comparison with passive controls, and when measured shortly after intervention completion, MBIs improve distress, anxiety, depression, well-being, rumination, and mindfulness with small to moderate effect sizes, with no benefit found for blood pressure, sleep, life satisfaction, resilience, worry, and thought suppression. Evidence for self-compassion is inconclusive. Effects last beyond three months for distress and mindfulness, with no data on other outcomes. Compared with active control groups, MBIs significantly improve distress and state anxiety, but not mindfulness, depression, well-being, affect, trait anxiety, or emotion regulation. Results were robust to adjustment for multiple testing, but RCTs' risk of bias is generally high. Moderator analyses did not find differential intervention effects according to intervention duration, delivery mode, or sub-populations. CONCLUSIONS: MBIs may be helpful to students but higher-quality research is needed.
Authors: Ruth Baer; Catherine Crane; Jesus Montero-Marin; Alice Phillips; Laura Taylor; Alice Tickell; Willem Kuyken Journal: Mindfulness (N Y) Date: 2020-12-02
Authors: Zohreh Doborjeh; Maryam Doborjeh; Mark Crook-Rumsey; Tamasin Taylor; Grace Y Wang; David Moreau; Christian Krägeloh; Wendy Wrapson; Richard J Siegert; Nikola Kasabov; Grant Searchfield; Alexander Sumich Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Ildiko Strehli; Ryan D Burns; Yang Bai; Donna H Ziegenfuss; Martin E Block; Timothy A Brusseau Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Julieta Galante; Jan Stochl; Géraldine Dufour; Maris Vainre; Adam Peter Wagner; Peter Brian Jones Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 3.710