Literature DB >> 31743882

Performance comparison between MRI and CT for local staging of sigmoid and descending colon cancer.

Li-Heng Liu1, Han Lv2, Zhen-Chang Wang2, Sheng-Xiang Rao3, Meng-Su Zeng1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of MRI and CT for local staging of sigmoid and descending colon cancer, with pathological results as the reference standard.
METHOD: This retrospective study included 116 patients with sigmoid or descending colon cancer who underwent both MRI and CT before surgery. MRI and CT images were separately reviewed by two independent and blinded radiologists to assess the following features: T-stage, presence of extramural extension (T3-4 disease), lymph node metastases (N+), and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI+). Diagnostic performance with sensitivity and specificity for detecting positive status (T3-4, N+ or EMVI+) were assessed using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve, and compared between MRI and CT.
RESULTS: MRI achieved correct T-stage in 81 of 116 patients (69.8 %) while CT in 66 (56.9 %). For detecting T3-4 disease, MRI showed better performance than CT with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.888 versus 0.712 (P =  0.002) and specificity of 81.82 % versus 54.6 % (P =  0.011). No significance was found in sensitivity between two modalities (89.2 % versus 83.1 %, P =  0.302). For detecting N+ disease, performance of MRI and CT were similar (AUC, 0.670 versus 0.650, P =  0.412). For detecting EMVI+, MRI showed better performance than CT (AUC, 0.780 versus 0.575, P =  0.012) with significantly higher sensitivity (68.6 % versus 40.0 %, P =  0.031) and similar specificity (both are 84.3 %).
CONCLUSIONS: MRI may offer more superior diagnostic performance than CT for detecting T3-4 disease and EMVI, thereby supporting its alternative application to CT in local staging of colon cancer.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Tomography; X-ray computed

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31743882     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  8 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rathin Gosavi; Clemente Chia; Michael Michael; Alexander G Heriot; Satish K Warrier; Joseph C Kong
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Factors related to short-term outcomes and delayed systemic treatment following primary tumor resection for asymptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tetsuro Tominaga; Takashi Nonaka; Toshio Shiraisi; Kiyoaki Hamada; Keisuke Noda; Hiroaki Takeshita; Keizaburo Maruyama; Hidetoshi Fukuoka; Hideo Wada; Shintaro Hashimoto; Terumitsu Sawai; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Development and validation of a nomogram for further decision of radical surgery in pT1 colorectal cancer after local resection.

Authors:  Shu Yan; Haiyang Ding; Xiaomu Zhao; Jin Wang; Wei Deng
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Value of MSCT plus MRI in the Detection of Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Jingni Zhang; Yu Bao
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Reporting colon cancer staging using a template.

Authors:  Malene Roland V Pedersen; Claus Dam; Martina Loft; Søren R Rafaelsen
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2020-01-29

6.  CT and 3 Tesla MRI in the TN Staging of Colon Cancer: A Prospective, Blind Study.

Authors:  Søren R Rafaelsen; Claus Dam; Chris Vagn-Hansen; Jakob Møller; Hans B Rahr; Mikkel Sjöström; Jan Lindebjerg; Torben Frøstrup Hansen; Malene Roland Vils Pedersen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Comparison of the practicability of ultrasound and spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of colon cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Zhao; Qingya Yang; Cunzhong Meng; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Radiomic analysis for predicting prognosis of colorectal cancer from preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Lilang Lv; Bowen Xin; Yichao Hao; Ziyi Yang; Junyan Xu; Lisheng Wang; Xiuying Wang; Shaoli Song; Xiaomao Guo
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.531

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.