Purpose: The role of corneal epithelial dendritic cells (CEDC), a subtype of antigen presenting cells, in ocular allergy remains largely unknown. This cross-sectional study evaluated the density and morphology of CEDC in participants diagnosed with systemic allergy, to increase our understanding of the role of CEDC in ocular inflammation associated with systemic allergy.Materials and methods: A convenience sample of 50 participants was categorised into allergic and non-allergic groups (31 allergic and 19 non-allergic) based on the results of skin prick test (SPT). Ocular allergy symptoms, clinical ocular surface signs and serum IgE were assessed. In vivo confocal microscopy was performed on the right eye only. The number of CEDC in a 1mm2 region at both the central and mid-peripheral cornea was manually counted. CEDC morphology was graded on a 1 to 3 scale. Results: Ocular surface symptoms, signs (other than eyelid oedema), and serum IgE were significantly higher in the allergic (SPT+) group. CEDC density at the mid-peripheral cornea was significantly lower in the allergic group (p = .003). CEDC morphology grades were significantly higher in allergic participants in the central cornea (p = .02), with the highest grade morphology observed only in allergic participants. No associations were evident between CEDC density or morphology and ocular signs, symptoms or serum IgE.Conclusions: The study showed reduced CEDC density and cells with longer dendrites in allergic participants. The more mature CEDC morphology in the allergic group is suggestive of an inflammatory or immune response.
Purpose: The role of corneal epithelial dendritic cells (CEDC), a subtype of antigen presenting cells, in ocular allergy remains largely unknown. This cross-sectional study evaluated the density and morphology of CEDC in participants diagnosed with systemic allergy, to increase our understanding of the role of CEDC in ocular inflammation associated with systemic allergy.Materials and methods: A convenience sample of 50 participants was categorised into allergic and non-allergic groups (31 allergic and 19 non-allergic) based on the results of skin prick test (SPT). Ocular allergy symptoms, clinical ocular surface signs and serum IgE were assessed. In vivo confocal microscopy was performed on the right eye only. The number of CEDC in a 1mm2 region at both the central and mid-peripheral cornea was manually counted. CEDC morphology was graded on a 1 to 3 scale. Results: Ocular surface symptoms, signs (other than eyelid oedema), and serum IgE were significantly higher in the allergic (SPT+) group. CEDC density at the mid-peripheral cornea was significantly lower in the allergic group (p = .003). CEDC morphology grades were significantly higher in allergicparticipants in the central cornea (p = .02), with the highest grade morphology observed only in allergicparticipants. No associations were evident between CEDC density or morphology and ocular signs, symptoms or serum IgE.Conclusions: The study showed reduced CEDC density and cells with longer dendrites in allergicparticipants. The more mature CEDC morphology in the allergic group is suggestive of an inflammatory or immune response.
Entities:
Keywords:
Corneal epithelial dendritic cell; In vivo confocal microscopy; allergy