Literature DB >> 31743630

Including Pregnant Women in Clinical Research: Practical Guidance for Institutional Review Boards.

Pamela Payne1.   

Abstract

Scanty evidence exists about the safety and effectiveness of drugs-and of their efficacious dosing-that women may need to treat acute and chronic health issues during their pregnancies. This lack of evidence puts pregnant women and their fetuses at risk of harm from the use or avoidance of drugs during pregnancy. In light of the protectionist approach in regulations governing research with pregnant women and fetuses, trial sponsors, researchers, clinicians, and institutional review boards (IRBs) have been reluctant to include pregnant women in clinical drug trials, applying ethical reasoning for exclusions that reflects a default exclusionary approach. Yet in recent years, many clinicians, researchers, bioethicists, and professional societies have called for a reexamination of the routine practice of excluding pregnant women from clinical research. This paper proposes a practical approach to an ethical framework for IRBs that supports fair inclusion, rather than routine exclusion, of pregnant women in clinical research. This guidance will aid IRBs in ethically including and appropriately protecting pregnant women in research.
© 2019 by The Hastings Center. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical drug trials; fair inclusion; human subjects research; pregnant women

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31743630     DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethics Hum Res        ISSN: 2578-2355


  6 in total

1.  IRB Decision-Making about Minimal Risk Research with Pregnant Participants.

Authors:  Amina White; Christine Grady; Margaret Little; Kristen Sullivan; Katie Clark; Monalisa Ngwu; Anne Drapkin Lyerly
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2021-09

2.  The promise, problems, and pitfalls of including pregnant women in clinical trials of Lassa fever vaccine: a qualitative assessment of sub-Sahara Africa investigators' perception.

Authors:  Kolawole Akeem Salami; Henshaw Eyambe Mandi; Nathalie Imbault; Nadia Gabriela Tornieporth
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2022-03-23

3.  Registered Clinical Trials Comprising Pregnant Women in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Yi Zhao; Guiping Du; Xiaofei Luan; Hui Yang; Qiongguang Zhang; Zhengfu Zhang; Subiao Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.988

4.  Acceptability of Clinical Trials on COVID-19 during Pregnancy among Pregnant Women and Healthcare Providers: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Elena Marbán-Castro; Clara Pons-Duran; Laura García-Otero; Haily Chen; Luis Bernardo Herrera; María Del Mar Gil; Anna Goncé; Elena Ferriols-Pérez; Miguel Ángel Rodríguez; Paloma Toro; Azucena Bardají; Raquel González; Clara Menéndez; Cristina Enguita-Fernàndez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Clinical Drug Trial Participation: Perspectives of Pregnant Women and Their Spouses.

Authors:  Yi Zhao; Li Zhang; Yarui Geng
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Clinical comparison between trial participants and potentially eligible patients using electronic health record data: A generalizability assessment method.

Authors:  James R Rogers; George Hripcsak; Ying Kuen Cheung; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 8.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.