| Literature DB >> 31743376 |
Hanno Maassen1,2, Koen D W Hendriks1,3, Leonie H Venema1, Rob H Henning3, Sijbrand H Hofker1, Harry van Goor2, Henri G D Leuvenink1, Annemieke M Coester1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since the start of organ transplantation, hypothermia-forced hypometabolism has been the cornerstone in organ preservation. Cold preservation showed to protect against ischemia, although post-transplant injury still occurs and further improvement in preservation techniques is needed. We hypothesize that hydrogen sulphide can be used as such a new preservation method, by inducing a reversible hypometabolic state in human sized kidneys during normothermic machine perfusion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31743376 PMCID: PMC6863563 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1H2S effects on kidney perfusion and oxygen consumption.
A. After H2S infusion at 37 oC, a significant (p = 0.047) decrease from 409 ΔhPa⋅ml/min/gr to 160 ΔhPa⋅ml/min/gr is seen which restores to normal oxygen consumption levels with a temporary increase within 20 minutes after NaHS infusion. B. Mitochondrial membrane potential in H2S treated pig kidney mitochondria (data expressed as ratio red / green relative to control) show a 39% decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential in 100 ppm NaHS treated mitochondria compared to non-treated mitochondria. C. ATP levels in renal tissue (data expressed as μmol ATP/g protein as of baseline) show no clear alteration after H2S infusion but remain higher after infusion of H2S. D. As a result of H2S administration, flow reduced from 188 ml/min till 152 ml/min. After 20 minutes, the reduced flow restored to slightly above normal levels at 206 ml/min but restores to control levels within 40 minutes after NaHS administration. Figure A, B, D, presented as mean + SEM.
Fig 2Kidney function during H2S treatment.
A. Diuresis (mL) showing a rigorous increase after H2S infusion and restored to control levels within 30 minutes. Data expressed as % of baseline B. Fractional excretion of sodium (FEna) showing difference between the H2S and control group. Data expressed as % of baseline C. Creatinine clearance (mL/min) showing no difference between the H2S and control group. Data expressed as % of baseline. D. lactate level (mmol/L) of perfusion fluid showing a higher venous lactate level of the H2S treated group after infusion of H2S. E. pH level of perfusion fluid.
Fig 3Renal damage response.
A. PAS stained tissue with comparable histological appearance between H2S treated and control. B. LDH levels in the perfusion fluid (mmol/L) showed no difference between the H2S treated and control group. C. ASAT levels in the perfusion fluid (mmol/L) showed no difference between the H2S treated and control group. D. Lipid peroxidation, expressed as μM corrected for protein level, showed a trend towards decreased MDA levels in the H2S treated kidneys. Data expressed as mean with SEM.
Fig 4Renal superoxide production measured with dihydroethidium (DHE) fluorescence in control and H2S perfused porcine kidneys.
A. Mean area in which superoxide damage was found, B. Mean fluorescent signal. Data expressed as mean with SEM. 40X magnification.