Literature DB >> 31743177

Global and Regional Respiratory Mechanics During Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Study.

Julio C Brandão1,2, Marcos A Lessa1,3, Gabriel Motta-Ribeiro1, Soshi Hashimoto1, Luis Felipe Paula1, Vinicius Torsani4, Linh Le1, Xiaodong Bao1, Matthias Eikermann5, Douglas M Dahl5, Hao Deng1, Shahin Tabatabaei1, Marcelo B P Amato4, Marcos F Vidal Melo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pneumoperitoneum and nonphysiological positioning required for robotic surgery increase cardiopulmonary risk because of the use of larger airway pressures (Paws) to maintain tidal volume (VT). However, the quantitative partitioning of respiratory mechanics and transpulmonary pressure (PL) during robotic surgery is not well described. We tested the following hypothesis: (1) the components of driving pressure (transpulmonary and chest wall components) increase in a parallel fashion at robotic surgical stages (Trendelenburg and robot docking); and (2) deep, when compared to routine (moderate), neuromuscular blockade modifies those changes in PLs as well as in regional respiratory mechanics.
METHODS: We studied 35 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II patients undergoing elective robotic surgery. Airway and esophageal balloon pressures and respiratory flows were measured to calculate respiratory mechanics. Regional lung aeration and ventilation was assessed with electrical impedance tomography and level of neuromuscular blockade with acceleromyography. During robotic surgical stages, 2 crossover randomized groups (conditions) of neuromuscular relaxation were studied: Moderate (1 twitch in the train-of-four stimulation) and Deep (1-2 twitches in the posttetanic count).
RESULTS: Pneumoperitoneum was associated with increases in driving pressure, tidal changes in PL, and esophageal pressure (Pes). Steep Trendelenburg position during robot docking was associated with further worsening of the respiratory mechanics. The fraction of driving pressures that partitioned to the lungs decreased from baseline (63% ± 15%) to Trendelenburg position (49% ± 14%, P < .001), due to a larger increase in chest wall elastance (Ecw; 12.7 ± 7.6 cm H2O·L) than in lung elastance (EL; 4.3 ± 5.0 cm H2O·L, P < .001). Consequently, from baseline to Trendelenburg, the component of Paw affecting the chest wall increased by 6.6 ± 3.1 cm H2O, while PLs increased by only 3.4 ± 3.1 cm H2O (P < .001). PL and driving pressures were larger at surgery end than at baseline and were accompanied by dorsal aeration loss. Deep neuromuscular blockade did not change respiratory mechanics, regional aeration and ventilation, and hemodynamics.
CONCLUSIONS: In robotic surgery with pneumoperitoneum, changes in ventilatory driving pressures during Trendelenburg and robot docking are distributed less to the lungs than to the chest wall as compared to routine mechanical ventilation for supine patients. This effect of robotic surgery derives from substantially larger increases in Ecw than ELs and reduces the risk of excessive PLs. Deep neuromuscular blockade does not meaningfully change global or regional lung mechanics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31743177     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of the effects of deep and moderate neuromuscular block on respiratory system compliance and surgical space conditions during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Shao-Jun Zhu; Xiao-Lin Zhang; Qing Xie; Yan-Feng Zhou; Kui-Rong Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2020 Aug.       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Individualized PEEP to optimise respiratory mechanics during abdominal surgery: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ana Fernandez-Bustamante; Juraj Sprung; Robert A Parker; Karsten Bartels; Toby N Weingarten; Carolina Kosour; B Taylor Thompson; Marcos F Vidal Melo
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Comparison of arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient P (a-ET)CO2 in volume versus pressure controlled ventilation in patients undergoing robotic abdominal surgery in the Trendelenburg position. A randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Sugashini Veerasamy; Lakshmi Kumar; Anandajith Kartha; Sunil Rajan; Niranjan Kumar; Shyam S Purushottaman
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-08-12

Review 4.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2018-2019 end of year summary: respiration.

Authors:  D S Karbing; G Perchiazzi; S E Rees; M B Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  The Association of Intraoperative driving pressure with postoperative pulmonary complications in open versus closed abdominal surgery patients - a posthoc propensity score-weighted cohort analysis of the LAS VEGAS study.

Authors:  Guido Mazzinari; Ary Serpa Neto; Sabrine N T Hemmes; Goran Hedenstierna; Samir Jaber; Michael Hiesmayr; Markus W Hollmann; Gary H Mills; Marcos F Vidal Melo; Rupert M Pearse; Christian Putensen; Werner Schmid; Paolo Severgnini; Hermann Wrigge; Oscar Diaz Cambronero; Lorenzo Ball; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Paolo Pelosi; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Effects of ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment manoeuvres compared with sustained inflation or no recruitment manoeuvres on atelectasis in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery as assessed by ultrasonography: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Xiong-Zhi Wu; Hai-Mei Xia; Ping Zhang; Lei Li; Qiao-Hao Hu; Su-Ping Guo; Tian-Yuan Li
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.376

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.