Literature DB >> 31742598

Assessment of techniques used for superimposition of maxillary and mandibular 3D surface models to evaluate tooth movement: a systematic review.

Sven Stucki1, Nikolaos Gkantidis1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Superimposition of three-dimensional (3D) digital models offers great opportunities to assess tooth movement during time. In the literature, several superimposition techniques are described.
OBJECTIVES: To summarize and critically assess the available evidence from studies on serial digital 3D dental model superimposition. SEARCH
METHODS: MEDLINE via Ovid and PubMed, EMBASE via Ovid, Cochrane Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, and Google Scholar were searched with no time limit (last update: December 2018). Hand and unpublished literature searches were also performed. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies of any design that had a sample size ≥5 and tested superimposition of serial 3D digital dental models to assess tooth movement were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by the authors.
RESULTS: Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria. The total risk of bias (QUADAS-2 tool) of 10 studies was high, whereas only 2 studies had unclear bias. Ten studies had high and two studies low overall applicability concerns. From these, one study tested the mandibular alveolar bone area, three studies the rugae area, nine studies a larger palatal area, and two studies the incisive papilla area. The high heterogeneity in samples, outcomes, and methods did not allow for synthesis of a considerable amount of studies in any case. LIMITATIONS: The high heterogeneity among studies and the limited evidence did not allow for solid conclusions. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The following areas of the maxilla could provide reliable outcomes: (1) the medial two-thirds of the third rugae and the area 5 mm dorsal to them and (2) an area including all rugae, with the lateral margins located at least 5 mm from the gingival margins and a distal margin that does not extend beyond the first molars. No recommendation is possible for other regions of the mouth. There is an urgent need for further research in the field. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42019124365).
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31742598     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjz075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  9 in total

1.  Comparison and reproducibility of three methods for maxillary digital dental model registration in open bite patients.

Authors:  Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo; Lorena Vilanova; Guilherme Janson; Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén; Daniela Garib; Felicia Miranda; Camila Massaro; Marilia Yatabe; Lucia Cevidanes; Antonio Carlos Ruellas
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.563

2.  An accurate and efficient method for occlusal tooth wear assessment using 3D digital dental models.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gkantidis; Konstantinos Dritsas; Yijin Ren; Demetrios Halazonetis; Christos Katsaros
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  3D Method for Occlusal Tooth Wear Assessment in Presence of Substantial Changes on Other Tooth Surfaces.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gkantidis; Konstantinos Dritsas; Christos Katsaros; Demetrios Halazonetis; Yijin Ren
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Digital model superimpositions: are different software algorithms equally accurate in quantifying linear tooth movements?

Authors:  Samar M Adel; Nikhilesh R Vaid; Nadia El-Harouni; Hassan Kassem; Abbas R Zaher
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Validation of three-dimensional digital model superimpositions based on palatal structures in patients with maximum anterior tooth retraction following premolar extraction.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Kyong-Min Koh; Sung-Hwan Choi; Ji-Hoi Kim; Jung-Yul Cha
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 1.361

6.  Three-dimensional dentoalveolar changes in open bite treatment in mixed dentition, spurs/posterior build-ups versus spurs alone: 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo; Guilherme Janson; Lorena Vilanova; Lucia Cevidanes; Marilia Yatabe; Daniela Garib; Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén; Felicia Miranda; Camila Massaro; Silvio Augusto Bellini-Pereira; Antonio Carlos Ruellas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Assessment of methods used for 3-dimensional superimposition of craniofacial skeletal structures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Dinh-Phuc Mai; Sven Stucki; Nikolaos Gkantidis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  3D-analysis of unwanted tooth movements despite bonded orthodontic retainers: a pilot study.

Authors:  Katharina Klaus; Faidra Xirouchaki; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Intraoral scanners for capturing the palate and its relation to the dentition.

Authors:  Jonas Winkler; Nikolaos Gkantidis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.