Literature DB >> 31742571

New device and technique for lung deflation in bronchial blocker.

Hou-Chuan Lai1, Zhi-Fu Wu.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31742571      PMCID: PMC6613717          DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


× No keyword cloud information.
Editor, The double-lumen tube has been called ‘a difficult tube’ for its difficult tracheal intubation and bronchial positioning.[1] Therefore, in patients with difficult airways, the safest approach is to place a single-lumen endotracheal tube, and achieve lung isolation in these patients with a bronchial blocker for one-lung ventilation (OLV).[2,3] But lung deflation with a bronchial blocker is time-consuming, because adequate suctioning of the operative lung is difficult through the narrow lumen of a bronchial blocker catheter[2,4] Thus, in order to accelerate the speed of lung deflation using a bronchial blocker, a number of techniques have been developed, including disconnection (apnoea) and the use of continuous bronchial blocker suction techniques.[5] However, the disconnection technique may carry a risk of blood or infected secretions contaminating the dependent lung resulting in hypoxaemia or hypoxia in patients with poor lung function, with the attendant morbidities.[5,6] We report a new method to make lung deflation faster with a bronchial blocker by continuous bronchial suction technique using a modified device, an intravenous T-connector extension set (Perfect Medical Ind. Co., Ltd., Pei Dou Zhen, Changhua Hsieh, Taiwan R.O.C., Vietnam) and a handmade oblique-cut tracheobronchial suction catheter (BSUP14; Symphon Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Taiwan). After tracheal intubation with a single-lumen endotracheal tube (I.D. 7.0 mm for women and 7.5 mm for men), a bronchial blocker (Fuji Uniblocker; Fuji Systems, Tokyo, Japan) was introduced to the targeted bronchus. The correct position was confirmed with the fibreoptic bronchoscope and auscultation. After skin sterilisation, the blue balloon of the bronchial blocker was inflated. We then connected the modified device (Fig. 1) and applied continuous suction with pressure of −30 cmH2O from the suction port of the bronchial blocker until pleural opening and the operative lung deflation. With this technique, we found OLV with operative lung collapse and pleural opening (Fig. 2) easier. This technique is simple to perform and may reduce risks of hypoxaemia compared with the more conventional apnoea technique.
Fig. 1

Continuous bronchial suction technique using a modified device of an i.v. T-connector extension set and oblique-cut suction tube.

Fig. 2

Good one-lung ventilation after pleural opening.

Continuous bronchial suction technique using a modified device of an i.v. T-connector extension set and oblique-cut suction tube. Good one-lung ventilation after pleural opening. However, continuous aspiration via a suction port carries a risk of causing obstruction of the bronchial blocker's aspiration channel by pulmonary secretions or blood resulting from surgical manipulations, especially during lung re-expansion. Although this device seems effective to quickly achieve lung collapse, it cannot be advocated, in the current state of knowledge, as a technical support for all surgery.
  6 in total

1.  Choosing a lung isolation device for thoracic surgery: a randomized trial of three bronchial blockers versus double-lumen tubes.

Authors:  Manu Narayanaswamy; Karen McRae; Peter Slinger; Geoffrey Dugas; George W Kanellakos; Andy Roscoe; Melanie Lacroix
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Difficult tubes and difficult airways.

Authors:  J L Benumof
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 3.  Con: a bronchial blocker is not a substitute for a double-lumen endobronchial tube.

Authors:  Jay B Brodsky
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  A comparison of the disconnection technique with continuous bronchial suction for lung deflation when using the Arndt endobronchial blocker during video-assisted thoracoscopy: A randomised trial.

Authors:  Mohamed R El-Tahan
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Difficult airway and one lung ventilation.

Authors:  Mojca Drnovsek Globokar; Vesna Novak-Jankovic
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.780

6.  Disconnection technique with a bronchial blocker for improving lung deflation: a comparison with a double-lumen tube and bronchial blocker without disconnection.

Authors:  Ji Young Yoo; Dae Hee Kim; Ho Choi; Kun Kim; Yun Jeong Chae; Sung Yong Park
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.628

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.