Literature DB >> 31742511

Zika Virus IgM 25 Months after Symptom Onset, Miami-Dade County, Florida, USA.

Isabel Griffin, Stacey W Martin, Marc Fischer, Trudy V Chambers, Olga L Kosoy, Cynthia Goldberg, Alyssa Falise, Vanessa Villamil, Olga Ponomareva, Leah D Gillis, Carina Blackmore, Reynald Jean.   

Abstract

We assessed IgM detection in Zika patients from the 2016 outbreak in Miami-Dade County, Florida, USA. Of those with positive or equivocal IgM after 12-19 months, 87% (26/30) had IgM 6 months later. In a survival analysis, ≈76% had IgM at 25 months. Zika virus IgM persists for years, complicating serologic diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Florida; IgM; IgM antibody capture ELISA; MAC-ELISA; Miami-Dade County; United States; Zika virus; antibody persistence; antibody survival; flaviviruses; immunoglobulin M; mosquitoborne viruses; vector-borne infections; viruses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31742511      PMCID: PMC6874245          DOI: 10.3201/eid2512.191022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Diagnosis of Zika virus infection is accomplished by testing for viral RNA or IgM and neutralizing antibodies (). A cohort study of 62 confirmed Zika virus cases from the 2016 outbreak in Miami-Dade County, Florida, USA, demonstrated that Zika virus IgM remains detectable in most (92%) persons 12‒19 months after symptom onset (). We estimated the proportion of persons with detectable Zika virus IgM up to 25 months after initial illness onset.

The Study

We included persons residing in Miami-Dade County who had confirmed Zika virus disease with symptom onset during June‒October 2016 and had participated in a previous prospective cohort study (). Of the original 62 patients, we asked all 57 patients with positive or equivocal Zika virus IgM results at 12‒19 months after symptom onset to provide another specimen 6 months later. We obtained written consent for the additional specimen from study participants. We tested all serum specimens at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Fort Collins, Colorado, USA) by the IgM capture ELISA for Zika virus (–). We used SAS version 9.4 (https://www.sas.com) to manage and analyze the data and performed a nonparametric survival analysis (i.e., PROC ICLIFETEST) for interval-censored data to estimate the duration of Zika virus IgM detection. For this procedure, we considered survival to be the detection of Zika virus IgM (a positive or equivocal result). We included the IgM results of specimens from all 62 original participants collected 12‒19 months after symptom onset and the IgM results from all follow-up specimens acquired in the survival analysis. The Florida Health Institutional Review Board (Tallahassee, Florida, USA) approved this study. Of 57 persons with positive or equivocal Zika virus IgM results at 12‒19 months after symptom onset, 30 (53%) provided a follow-up specimen. The median time of specimen collection after symptom onset was 21 (range 18–25) months; 5 (17%) patients provided a specimen at 18 months after symptom onset, 1 (3%) at 19 months, 6 (20%) at 20 months, 9 (30%) at 21 months, 3 (10%) at 22 months, 3 (10%) at 23 months, 1 (3%) at 24 months, and 2 (7%) at 25 months. Demographics and clinical characteristics of the 62 participants in the original study were previously reported (). Of the 30 who provided an additional follow-up specimen, the median age at symptom onset was 45 (range 22–70) years; all were adults >18 years of age. Fifteen (50%) were female, and 14 (47%) were Hispanic. After reviewing case investigations, we found that 13 (43%) of these participants reported no international travel (outside of the continental United States) during the 2 years before collection of the last specimen. Of the 30 participants who provided a follow-up specimen, 19 (63%) were positive for Zika virus IgM, 7 (23%) had an equivocal result, and 4 (13%) were IgM seronegative. Compared with results from the specimen collection 6 months earlier, 20 (67%) remained positive for Zika virus IgM, 2 (7%) remained Zika virus IgM equivocal, 4 (13%) transitioned from Zika virus IgM positive to equivocal, and 4 (13%) transitioned from Zika virus IgM equivocal to negative; no participants switched from Zika virus IgM positive to negative. Because of the small sample size, we were unable to assess whether age group, race, or ethnicity was associated with Zika virus IgM results. When we used all available test results from the 62 participants, a survival analysis indicated that 93% (95% CI 82%‒97%) of participants had detectable (positive or equivocal) Zika virus IgM at 14 months after symptom onset, 91% (95% CI 81%‒96%) at 17 months, 81% (95% CI 69%‒89%) at 22 months, and 76% (95% CI 57%‒88%) at 25 months (Figure).
Figure

Estimated proportion of persons with detectable Zika virus IgM up to 25 months after symptom onset among persons with PCR-confirmed Zika virus disease, Miami-Dade County, Florida, USA. Detectable Zika virus IgM was defined as a positive or equivocal result on IgM capture ELISA. Interval-censored nonparametric survival analysis probability estimates and 95% CIs (gray boxes) are shown.

Estimated proportion of persons with detectable Zika virus IgM up to 25 months after symptom onset among persons with PCR-confirmed Zika virus disease, Miami-Dade County, Florida, USA. Detectable Zika virus IgM was defined as a positive or equivocal result on IgM capture ELISA. Interval-censored nonparametric survival analysis probability estimates and 95% CIs (gray boxes) are shown.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that approximately three quarters of persons with PCR-confirmed symptomatic Zika disease still have detectable IgM at 25 months after initial illness onset. The prolonged detection of IgM after Zika virus infection is consistent with previous findings for related flaviviruses (–). Our findings are specific to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention IgM capture ELISA for Zika virus, which targets the premembrane and envelope glycoproteins; other available IgM serologic assays targeting other Zika virus proteins might not produce comparable findings (). In addition, these results are only representative of symptomatic Zika cases; whether persons with asymptomatic Zika virus infections exhibit similar Zika virus IgM persistence is unknown. IgM persistence needs to be assessed with other serologic assays for both symptomatic and asymptomatic Zika virus cases to determine the full duration of Zika virus IgM after infection.
  10 in total

1.  Persistence of neutralizing antibody 30-35 years after immunization with 17D yellow fever vaccine.

Authors:  J D Poland; C H Calisher; T P Monath; W G Downs; K Murphy
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Standardization of immunoglobulin M capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for routine diagnosis of arboviral infections.

Authors:  D A Martin; D A Muth; T Brown; A J Johnson; N Karabatsos; J T Roehrig
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of anti-yellow fever virus immunoglobulin m antibodies at 3-4 years following yellow fever vaccination.

Authors:  Katherine B Gibney; Srilatha Edupuganti; Amanda J Panella; Olga I Kosoy; Mark J Delorey; Robert S Lanciotti; Mark J Mulligan; Marc Fischer; J Erin Staples
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Persistence of West Nile virus-specific antibodies in viremic blood donors.

Authors:  Harry E Prince; Leslie H Tobler; Cindy Yeh; Nelly Gefter; Brian Custer; Michael P Busch
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-07-25

Review 5.  Diagnostic Testing for Zika Virus: a Postoutbreak Update.

Authors:  Elitza S Theel; D Jane Hata
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Interim Guidance for Interpretation of Zika Virus Antibody Test Results.

Authors:  Ingrid B Rabe; J Erin Staples; Julie Villanueva; Kimberly B Hummel; Jeffrey A Johnson; Laura Rose; Susan Hills; Annemarie Wasley; Marc Fischer; Ann M Powers
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Virus and antibody dynamics in acute west nile virus infection.

Authors:  Michael P Busch; Steven H Kleinman; Leslie H Tobler; Hany T Kamel; Philip J Norris; Irina Walsh; Jose L Matud; Harry E Prince; Robert S Lanciotti; David J Wright; Jeffrey M Linnen; Sally Caglioti
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Persistence of virus-reactive serum immunoglobulin m antibody in confirmed west nile virus encephalitis cases.

Authors:  John T Roehrig; Denis Nash; Beth Maldin; Anne Labowitz; Denise A Martin; Robert S Lanciotti; Grant L Campbell
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Genetic and serologic properties of Zika virus associated with an epidemic, Yap State, Micronesia, 2007.

Authors:  Robert S Lanciotti; Olga L Kosoy; Janeen J Laven; Jason O Velez; Amy J Lambert; Alison J Johnson; Stephanie M Stanfield; Mark R Duffy
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Zika Virus IgM Detection and Neutralizing Antibody Profiles 12-19 Months after Illness Onset.

Authors:  Isabel Griffin; Stacey W Martin; Marc Fischer; Trudy V Chambers; Olga Kosoy; Alyssa Falise; Olga Ponomareva; Leah D Gillis; Carina Blackmore; Reynald Jean
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 6.883

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Rapid Decline of Zika Virus IgM Antibodies against the NS1 Protein in Imported Israeli Cases.

Authors:  Yaniv Lustig; Neta Zuckerman; Ravit Koren; Shiri Katz-Likvornik; Mayan Yizchaki; Ella Mendelson; Laurence Freedman; Eli Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Reprogramming of red blood cell metabolism in Zika virus-infected donors.

Authors:  Alexis Catala; Mars Stone; Michael P Busch; Angelo D'Alessandro
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.337

3.  Lack of Association between Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Zika Antibodies among Pregnant Women in Thailand between 1997 and 2015.

Authors:  Nicole Ngo-Giang-Huong; Charline Leroi; Dahlene Fusco; Tim R Cressey; Nantawan Wangsaeng; Nicolas Salvadori; Natedao Kongyai; Wasna Sirirungsi; Marc Lallemant; Prasert Auewarakul; Woottichai Khamduang; Gonzague Jourdain
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 5.048

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.