Literature DB >> 31742216

How Well do Orthopedic Surgeons Recognize Different Models of Total Elbow Arthroplasties on Plain Radiographs with the Use of a Diagnostic Flowchart?

Ante Prkić1,2,3,4,1,2,5, Femke Claessen1,2,3,4,1,2,5, Matthijs P Somford1,2,3,4,1,2,5, Bertram The1,2,3,4,1,2,5, Michel P J van den Bekerom1,2,3,4,1,2,5, Denise Eygendaal1,2,3,4,1,2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recognition of total elbow arthroplasties (TEAs) on plain radiographs is difficult due to a multitude of different types and models. Especially if surgery reports and documentation are not available, lost or when the primary surgery was performed in another hospital the prosthesis type may be undeterminable. Therefore we investigated in this platform study if a flowchart aids in recognition of thirteen different total elbow arthroplasty models on plain radiographs.
METHODS: An online questionnaire on the Shoulder and Elbow Platform was developed. Plain radiographs of thirteen TEA models were shown with and without the help of an especially developed flowchart describing distinguishing features.
RESULTS: Ten orthopedic surgeons specialized in upper extremity surgery completed the study. Recognition rates of the thirteen total elbow arthroplasty models ranged between 20 and 100 percent without the flowchart. Using the flowchart recognition varied between 40 and 90 percent. The recognition rates with the flowchart were not significantly higher. Inter-observer reliability did not increase on a significant level.
CONCLUSION: Correct recognition of total elbow arthroplasty models with plain radiographs remains imperfect with our developed flowchart. The flowchart increased correct recognition rates and inter-observer reliability. © BY THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Decision Trees; Elbow; Observer variation; Radiography; Recognition (Psychology); Replacement

Year:  2019        PMID: 31742216      PMCID: PMC6802548     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  9 in total

Review 1.  Total elbow arthroplasty is moving forward: Review on past, present and future.

Authors:  Ante Prkić; Christiaan Ja van Bergen; Bertram The; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-01-18

2.  Gallery of medical devices: part 1: orthopedic devices for the extremities and pelvis.

Authors:  Mihra S Taljanovic; Tim B Hunter; Michael D Miller; Joseph E Sheppard
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 3.  Gallery of medical devices.

Authors:  T B Hunter; P Lund
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  1997 May-Jun

4.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The Use of Eponyms for Surgical Approaches and Fractures in Elbow Surgery: Accuracy and Reliability Pre- and Post-Training.

Authors:  Jetske Viveen; Matthijs P Somford; Koen L M Koenraadt; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Denise Eygendaal; Inger B Schipper; Job N Doornberg
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-03

Review 6.  Joint arthroplasties and prostheses.

Authors:  Mihra S Taljanovic; Marci D Jones; Tim B Hunter; James B Benjamin; John T Ruth; Andrew W Brown; Joseph E Sheppard
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Gallery of uncommon orthopedic implants: a guide for emergency radiologist.

Authors:  Eric White; Darren Lu; Ben Eyer; Chris Gottsegen; Elke Ahlmann; Chris Allison
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-10-27

Review 8.  The rise of the metal elbow.

Authors:  Marc Fajardo; Young W Kwon
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)       Date:  2013

9.  Recognizing the elbow prosthesis on conventional radiographs.

Authors:  Kamilcan Oflazoglu; Nienke Koenrades; Matthijs P Somford; Michel P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2016-09-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.