Literature DB >> 31741888

Lipofilling after breast conserving surgery: a comprehensive literature review investigating its oncologic safety.

Stephanie Cohen1, Yurie Sekigami1, Theresa Schwartz2, Albert Losken3, Julie Margenthaler4, Abhishek Chatterjee1.   

Abstract

Lipofilling has regenerative properties used to improve deformities after breast conserving surgery. Our hypothesis is that there is inadequate data to ensure that lipofilling does not increase locoregional cancer recurrence after breast conserving surgery. A PRISMA comprehensive literature review was conducted of articles published prior to October 2019 investigating recurrence in patients who underwent lipofilling after breast conserving surgery. All forms of breast conserving surgery, fat grafting, and injection intervals were included. Patients undergoing mastectomy were excluded. Requirements to define lipofilling as "safe" included (I) a defined interval between resection and lipofilling; (II) a minimum follow-up period of 6 years from tumor resection; (III) a minimum follow-up period of 3 years from lipofilling; (IV) presence of a control group; (V) controls matched for ER/PR/Her-2; (VI) a sub-group analysis focusing on ER/PR/Her-2; (VII) adequate powering. Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria. The range in time from breast conserving surgery to fat injection was 0-76 months. The average time to follow-up after lipofilling was 23 days-60 months. Two studies had a sufficient follow-up time from both primary resection and from lipofilling. Seventeen of the nineteen studies specified the interval between resection and lipofilling, but there is currently no consensus regarding how soon lipofilling can be performed following BCS. Eight studies performed a subgroup analysis in cases of recurrence and found recurrence after lipofilling was associated with number of positive axillary nodes, intraepithelial neoplasia, high grade histology, Luminal A subtype, age <50, Ki-67 expression, and lipofilling within 3 months of primary resection. Of the eleven studies that included a comparison group, one matched patient for Her-2 and there was a statistically significant difference in Her-2 positive cancers in the study arms of two articles. Several studies deemed lipofilling "safe," two showed association of lipofilling and local recurrence, and most studies concluded that further research was needed. Insufficient and contradictory data exists to demonstrate the safety of lipofilling after breast conserving surgery. A multicentered, well designed study is needed to verify the safety of this practice. 2019 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast conserving surgery; lipofilling; recurrence

Year:  2019        PMID: 31741888      PMCID: PMC6842766          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2019.09.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  40 in total

1.  Surgical and oncological outcomes of free dermal fat graft for breast reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Fabrizio De Biasio; Serena Bertozzi; Ambrogio P Londero; Daria Almesberger; Chiara Zanin; Andrea Marchesi; Carla Cedolini; Andrea Risaliti; Pier C Parodi
Journal:  Adv Clin Exp Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.727

2.  A Consensus Definition and Classification System of Oncoplastic Surgery Developed by the American Society of Breast Surgeons.

Authors:  Abhishek Chatterjee; Jennifer Gass; Krishnabhai Patel; Dennis Holmes; Katherine Kopkash; Lashan Peiris; Anne Peled; Jessica Ryan; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Julie Reiland
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Autologous fat transfer after breast cancer surgery: An exact-matching study on the long-term oncological safety.

Authors:  Luca Sorrentino; Lea Regolo; Elisabetta Scoccia; Gianfranco Petrolo; Daniela Bossi; Sara Albasini; Annalisa Caruso; Renzo Vanna; Carlo Morasso; Serena Mazzucchelli; Marta Truffi; Fabio Corsi
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Locoregional recurrence risk after lipofilling in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  J Y Petit; E Botteri; V Lohsiriwat; M Rietjens; F De Lorenzi; C Garusi; F Rossetto; S Martella; A Manconi; F Bertolini; G Curigliano; P Veronesi; B Santillo; N Rotmensz
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Cosmetic breast augmentation utilizing autologous fat and liposuction techniques.

Authors:  M Bircoll
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  Oncological outcomes of lipofilling breast reconstruction: 195 consecutive cases and literature review.

Authors:  Claudio Silva-Vergara; Joan Fontdevila; Jordi Descarrega; Fernando Burdio; Tai-Sik Yoon; Luis Grande
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Breast Cancer Recurrence Is not Increased With Lipofilling Reconstruction: A Case-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Claudio Silva-Vergara; Joan Fontdevila; Omar Weshahy; Marta Yuste; Jordi Descarrega; Luis Grande
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Armando E Giuliano; Kelly K Hunt; Karla V Ballman; Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Linda M McCall; Monica Morrow
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Results from the American Society of Breast Surgeons Oncoplastic Surgery Committee 2017 Survey: Current Practice and Future Directions.

Authors:  Abhishek Chatterjee; Jennifer Gass; M Barbara Burke; Katherine Kopkash; Mahmoud B El-Tamer; Dennis R Holmes; Patricia Clark; Juliann Reiland
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Surgical trends in breast cancer: a rise in novel operative treatment options over a 12 year analysis.

Authors:  Michael M Jonczyk; Jolie Jean; Roger Graham; Abhishek Chatterjee
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Fat Grafting in Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Acara Turner; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Matthew J Davis; Sebastian J Winocour; Summer E Hanson; Carrie K Chu
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  The neoadjuvant chemotherapy responses and survival rates of patients with different molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Xiaoyu Zhang; Lijun Jin; Zunyi Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  Oncological outcomes of lipofilling in breast reconstruction: a matched cohort study with 250 patients.

Authors:  Jose M Casarrubios; Mónica Francés; Victor Fuertes; Margit Singer; Carlos Navarro; Orlando García-Duque; Javier Fernández-Palacios
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

4.  Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in oncological patients: long-term oncological outcome analysis of the treatment of subcutaneous venous access device scars in 89 breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Christian Eichler; Jens Üner; Fabinshy Thangarajah; Julia Radosa; Max Zinser; Lotta Ada Fischer; Julian Puppe; Matthias Warm; Wolfram Malter; Caroline Lenz
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  An In Vitro Approach for Investigating the Safety of Lipotransfer after Breast-Conserving Therapy.

Authors:  Theresa Promny; Chiara-Sophia Kutz; Tina Jost; Luitpold V Distel; Sheetal Kadam; Rafael Schmid; Andreas Arkudas; Raymund E Horch; Annika Kengelbach-Weigand
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-05

6.  An experimental study on the prosthesis produced by inactivated autologous subcutaneous adipose tissue and skin dermal tissue in a mini-pig model.

Authors:  Chuner Jiang; Yongming Pan; Junjie Huang; Xiangming He; Jianfen Ni; Xiaowen Ding; Dehong Zou; Fangzheng Wang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.