Literature DB >> 31741830

Perioperative Factors Influencing Postoperative Satisfaction After Lateral Access Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Sheng Xu1, Ming Han Lincoln Liow1, Keng Meng Jeremy Goh1, William Yeo1, Zhixing Marcus Ling1, Chee Cheong Reuben Soh1, Seang Beng Tan1, Li Tat John Chen1, Chang Ming Guo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lateral access surgery (LAS) for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis is a minimally invasive lumbar fusion technique which has been gaining increasing popularity in the recent years. This study aims to identify perioperative factors that influence postoperative satisfaction after LAS for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
METHODS: From August 2010 to November 2014, 52 patients with lumbar degenerative conditions (16 male: 36 female, mean age 64.0 ± 8.7 years) were prospectively recruited and underwent LAS by a single surgeon. All patients were assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively with Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Oswestry Disability Index, Short-Form 36 (SF-36) scores, North American Spine Society score for neurogenic symptoms, patient satisfaction, and expectation fulfillment. Cobb angles, global lumbar lordosis, disc heights, adjacent disc heights, fusion, and subsidence were rates assessed. Multiple linear regression performed with satisfaction as dependent variable to identify predictive independent variables.
RESULTS: Lower preoperative SF-36 general health scores (P = .03), higher NPRS leg pain scores (P = .04), and longer surgical duration (P = .02) were significant predictors of lower satisfaction (P < .05). NPRS back and leg pain decreased by 80.3 and 83.0%, respectively. Oswestry Disability Index and North American Spine Society score for neurogenic symptoms improved by 76.2 and 75.9%, respectively. Ninety percent of patients reported excellent/good satisfaction. Significant correction and maintenance of Cobb and global lumbar lordosis angles were achieved. There was significant increase in disc heights postoperatively (P = .05) and no significant difference in adjacent disc heights at 2 years (P > .05). Ninety-eight percent of patients achieved Bridwell Fusion Grade 1, and 5.8% had Marchi Grade 3 subsidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower preoperative SF-36 general health, higher NPRS leg pain, and longer surgical duration are predictors of lower satisfaction in patients undergoing LAS for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Identifying preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome can assist clinicians in patient education prior to operation. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lateral access surgery; minimally invasive surgery; outcome; perioperative factors; spine surgery; spondylolisthesis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31741830      PMCID: PMC6833959          DOI: 10.14444/6056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  36 in total

1.  A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  T A Zdeblick; S M David
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  O Airaksinen; A Herno; V Turunen; T Saari; O Suomlainen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review.

Authors:  Timo J Aalto; Antti Malmivaara; Francisco Kovacs; Arto Herno; Markku Alen; Liisa Salmi; Heikki Kröger; Juan Andrade; Rosa Jiménez; Antti Tapaninaho; Veli Turunen; Sakari Savolainen; Olavi Airaksinen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity.

Authors:  Vivek A Mehta; Matthew J McGirt; Giannina L Garcés Ambrossi; Scott L Parker; Daniel M Sciubba; Ali Bydon; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.448

5.  Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review.

Authors:  Jim A Youssef; Paul C McAfee; Catherine A Patty; Erin Raley; Spencer DeBauche; Erin Shucosky; Liana Chotikul
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Early complications of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the obese.

Authors:  William B Rodgers; Curtis S Cox; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-08

7.  Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rihn; Ravi Patel; Junaid Makda; Joseph Hong; David G Anderson; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alan S Hilibrand; Todd J Albert
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.

Authors:  Luis Marchi; Nitamar Abdala; Leonardo Oliveira; Rodrigo Amaral; Etevaldo Coutinho; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-05-10

9.  Comparison of the mini-open versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Michael G Kaiser; Regis W Haid; Brian R Subach; Jay S Miller; C Dan Smith; Gerald E Rodts
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Value and cost in less invasive spinal fusion surgery: lessons from a community hospital.

Authors:  Kevin J Deluzio; John C Lucio; W B Rodgers
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2010-06-01
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ibrahim Akkawi; Hassan Zmerly
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-01-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.