M Andrew Johnston1. 1. Biodiversity Knowledge Integration Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Abstract
The genus Trogloderus LeConte, 1879, which is restricted to dunes and sandy habitats in the western United States, is revised using morphological and molecular information. Six new species are described from desert regions: Trogloderus arcanus New Species (Lahontan Trough); Trogloderus kandai New Species (Owens Valley); Trogloderus major New Species (Mohave Desert); Trogloderus skillmani New Species (eastern Great Basin and Mohave Desert); Trogloderus verpus New Species (eastern Colorado Plateau); and Trogloderus warneri New Species (western Colorado Plateau). A molecular phylogeny is presented for the genus and used to infer its historical biogeography. The most recent common ancestor of Trogloderus is dated to 5.2 mya and is inferred to have inhabited the Colorado Plateau. Current species most likely arose during the mid-Pleistocene where the geographic features of the Lahontan Trough, Bouse Embayment and Kaibab Plateau were significant factors driving speciation.
The genus Trogloderus LeConte, 1879, which is restricted to dunes and sandy habitats in the western United States, is revised using morphological and molecular information. Six new species are described from desert regions: Trogloderus arcanus New Species (Lahontan Trough); Trogloderus kandai New Species (Owens Valley); Trogloderus major New Species (Mohave Desert); Trogloderus skillmani New Species (eastern Great Basin and Mohave Desert); Trogloderus verpus New Species (eastern Colorado Plateau); and Trogloderus warneri New Species (western Colorado Plateau). A molecular phylogeny is presented for the genus and used to infer its historical biogeography. The most recent common ancestor of Trogloderus is dated to 5.2 mya and is inferred to have inhabited the Colorado Plateau. Current species most likely arose during the mid-Pleistocene where the geographic features of the Lahontan Trough, Bouse Embayment and Kaibab Plateau were significant factors driving speciation.
The psammophilic genus Trogloderus LeConte, 1879, was originally erected for a unique species and specimen of the family Tenebrionidae (sensu Bouchard et al., 2011; Bousquet et al., 2018). Described as Trogloderus costatus LeConte, 1879, from Rock Creek, Idaho, this heavily sculptured species was thought to be similar to the old-world Scaurini Billberg, 1820, but has long since been associated with the desert stink beetles in the genus Eleodes Eschscholtz, 1829 in what is now considered the tribe Amphidorini LeConte, 1862 (LeConte, 1879; Blaisdell, 1909; Doyen & Lawrence, 1979; Bousquet et al., 2018). Blaisdell (1909) described a second congeneric species, Trogloderus tuberculatus Blaisdell, 1909, from Los Angeles County, California during his revision of the tribe. A third species, T. nevadus La Rivers, 1943, was described from the dunes around Pyramid Lake, Nevada (La Rivers, 1943). The genus was then revised by La Rivers (1946), where the three previously recognized species were sunk to subspecies of an again monotypic genus and a fourth subspecies, T. costatus vandykei La Rivers, 1946, was described from outside 29 Palms, California.The recognition of subspecies (La Rivers, 1946) was supported by invoking the theory of orthogenesis, a teleological view of evolution where species have an internal mutational force that drives them not only to a point of adaptation but then continues to push the species onward toward extinction (Eimer, 1898; Mayr, 1982; see also Grehan & Ainsworth, 1985). Following this reasoning, it was hypothesized that Trogloderus has “embarked on that phase of evolutionary growth which seems to characterize any ancient group in the last stages of its existence—they are developing fluidly and rapidly into grotesque caricatures of their plain and drab ancestors” (La Rivers, 1946: 35).Following the 1946 revision, very little systematic research has been dedicated to this genus; except for two additional subspecies described as T. costatus pappi Kulzer, 1960, and T. costatus mayhewi Papp, 1961. All species and subspecies were described from a small number of specimens, with T. nevadus having the largest type series of 14 individuals. Subsequent to the above works, specimens in natural history collections have variously been determined as simply T. costatus or somewhat haphazardly assigned to subspecies. The last taxonomic changes to the genus were made by this author (MAJ) in the recent catalog of North American Tenebrionidae to stabilize the nomenclature in anticipation of this revision; namely, the subspecific names were all eliminated while restoring T. costatus, T. tuberculatus, T. nevadus and T. vandykei to specific standing, while T. costatus mayhewi (= T. vandykei) and T. costatus pappi (= T. tuberculatus) were invalidated as junior synonyms (Bousquet et al., 2018).During the half century since the last taxonomic works were completed, a comparatively large number of Trogloderus specimens have accumulated in North American natural history collections. These, along with targeted fieldwork for molecular vouchers, have made a thorough taxonomic and biogeographic study of Trogloderus possible for the first time.Trogloderus is distributed throughout the Intermountain Region, which encompasses the generally arid lands of western North America between the Rocky and Sierra Nevada mountains. This region spans the Great Basin and Mojave deserts to the west along with the Colorado Plateau to the east. The most comprehensive biogeographic work on the region was completed by Reveal (1979), based largely on his extensive botanical fieldwork. The vast landscape with limited access, particularly in the state of Nevada, has resulted in a general paucity of distributional knowledge and available specimens of beetles in natural history collections (Will, Madan & Hsu, 2017).The molecular phylogenies inferred for the herein revised species-level entities are used in phylogenetic dating analyses to infer the age of the genus and constituent species. They are further used in historical biogeographic reconstructions to understand the geographic influence of the Intermountain Region during speciation. The biogeographic hypotheses generated from these investigations are discussed in relation to other regional treatments. It is hoped that these insights will spur additional studies within the region and provide a framework to understand the relationships between organisms occurring in sand dunes.
Materials and Methods
Morphological methods
A total of 3,734 specimens were studied. Remarkably, over half (1,957) came from non-institutionalized collections, which is a testament to the importance of individual collections and collectors for documenting North American darkling beetle diversity. The following collections were used for this study:ADSC Aaron D. Smith Collection, Flagstaff, AZAMNH American Museum of Natural History, New York, NYASUHIC Hasbrouck Insect Collection, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZCASC California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CACSCA California State Collection of Arthropods, Sacramento, CACIDA Orma J. Smith Museum of Natural History, College of Idaho, Caldwell, IDEMEC Essig Museum of Entomology, University of California, Berkeley, CAFSCA Florida State Collection of Arthropods, Gainesville, FLFWSC Frederick W. Skillman Collection, Pearce, AZKKIC Kojun Kanda Insect Collection, Flagstaff, AZLACM Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CAMAJC M. Andrew Johnston Collection, Tempe, AZOSUC Triplehorn Insect Collection, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OHRLAC Rolf L. Aalbu Collection, Sacramento, CASWC Samuel Wells Collection, Cedar City, UTUCDC Bohart Museum of Entomology,University of California, Davis, Davis, CAUSNM National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DCWBWC William B. Warner Collection, Chandler, AZ.Specimens were examined using a Leica MZ16 stereomicroscope fitted with an ocular graticule for measurements. Internal anatomy was studied via 16 whole-body disarticulations where specimens were cleared in warm 10% KOH, neutralized in 5% acetic acid, and then separated into constituent sclerotized sections in glycerin. Beetle terminalia were further studied from many more specimens by dry dissection. This technique involved prying abdominal ventrites 4–5 and associated internal structures from the pinned specimens, soaking them in distilled water, and separating out the sclerotized reproductive structures. These structures (ovipositor or aedeagus) were then pointed along with the dismembered ventrites and surviving tergites underneath the original pinned specimen.Morphological terminology generally follows Doyen (1966). Female terminalia morphology follows Iwan & Kamiński (2016), whereas male terminalia morphology follows Iwan (2001) except for the usage of the term clavae (following Blaisdell, 1909) over laciniae for the ventral articulated structures of the fused parameres that flank the penis. A detailed internal and external description is provided for the genus and each species is then accompanied by a smaller differential description for the limited variable characters between species.The evolutionary species concept of Wiley & Mayden (2000) is employed in this study. Unique combinations of morphological characters, diagnosable monophyletic clades, and coherent geographic distributions were evaluated together to diagnose putative lineages with a shared evolutionary past and unique evolutionary trajectory.
Molecular and biogeographic methods
A total of 36 specimens of Trogloderus and an additional eight outgroup species from Amphidorini are included in the final matrix. For Trogloderus, all type localities were visited, and specimens representing each described species and subspecies were collected. Specimens were collected from as many known localities as possible, with sampling covering all broadly recognized geographic subregions. The collecting locality of each voucher is shown in Fig. 1, and the voucher numbers are included in all presented phylogenetic trees. An additional eight outgroups were included which span the known generic and subgeneric diversity of Amphidorini (Bousquet et al., 2018).
Figure 1
Collection localities of Trogloderus molecular vouchers and biogeographic regions.
All loci were separated into three possible partitions by codon position, except for the ribosomal 12s and 28s which were each left as a single partition, and were analyzed by PartitionFinder 2 (Lanfear et al., 2016) using unlinked branch lengths and the greedy search algorithm (Lanfear et al., 2012). The resultant two-partition scheme, which consisted of one partition including the third codon position of COI and COII and a second partition containing the rest of the data, was used in downstream phylogenetic and dating analyses. Phylogenetic reconstruction was performed both by RAxML version 8 (Stamatakis, 2014) with support values calculated by rapid bootstrap analysis with 500 replicates, and by MrBayes v3.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck, 2003) which was run using four chains for 10 million generations sampled every 1,000 with the first 25% being discarded as burnin. Trees were rooted by using the clade containing the three Eleodes subgenera Eleodes, Metablapylis Blaisdell, 1909, and Steneleodes Blaisdell 1909 based on previous phylogenetic analyses for the whole tribe (Johnston, 2018).Phylogenetic dating analyses were performed using two methods. First, RelTime (Tamura et al., 2012) as implemented in MEGA7 (Kumar, Stecher & Tamura, 2016) was used to infer a timetree given the maximum-likelihood tree from RAxML and the aligned nucleotide data. Second, the BEAST2 package (Bouckaert et al., 2014) was used to infer a dated phylogeny under both a Yule and Birth-Death model. The latter two analyses had unlinked exponential relaxed clocks for each partition and were run for 500 million generations and sampled every 20,000 with parameter convergence and estimated sample size being assessed via Tracer 1.7 (Rambaut et al., 2018) and a maximum clade credibility tree being computed by TreeAnnotator from the BEAST2 package with the first 25% of trees being discarded as burnin.Two geological calibration points were used for all phylogenetic dating analyses, due to the lack of any fossils for the tribe (Bousquet et al., 2018). The first calibration is the uplift of the Inyo and White Mountains, which form the eastern bounds of the Owens Valley and separate it from the Great Basin and Mojave Desert. The uplift of these mountains started between 2.8 and 2.3 mya (Bachman, 1979; Lee et al., 2009), and the calibration prior for the common ancestor of the three Trogloderus species distributed across these mountains was set as a normal distribution with a mean of 2.5 mya and standard deviation of one my. The second calibration is the deeply incised eastern margin of the Grand Canyon in northern Arizona. Two populations of a new species were sampled, one from sand dunes north of the Colorado river just below the Vermillion Cliffs, and one south of the Colorado River near Moenkopi. These two populations are separated by the gorge just downstream from Marble Canyon, which was been dated as 0.83 my old (Polyak, Hill & Asmerom, 2008). The calibration prior for the common ancestor of these two populations was set as a normal distribution with a mean of 0.83 mya and a standard deviation of 0.35 my.Historical biogeographic reconstructions were performed in the BioGeoBEARS package (Matzke, 2013) in R (R Core Team, 2018) using the calibrated tree from the RelTime analysis with each species collapsed to a single tip. Six biogeographic regions were defined (Fig. 1) based primarily on previous biogeographic work of the intermountain (Reveal, 1979) and southwestern desert (Van Dam & Matzke, 2016; Wilson & Pitts, 2010) regions. The six areas are as follows: (1) Great Basin—centered around northern Nevada, northwestern Utah and southern Idaho in the regions shaped by the prehistoric lakes Lahontan and Bonneville and including the Snake River plain (Reveal, 1979; Britten & Rust, 1996; Wilson & Pitts, 2010); (2) Mojave Desert—the southwestern-most region of Trogloderus distribution which includes much of southeastern California, southern Nevada as well as far western Arizona and southwestern Utah (Shreve, 1942; Reveal, 1979; Wilson & Pitts, 2010; Van Dam & Matzke, 2016); (3) Lahontan Trough—a transverse transition zone between the Mojave and Great Basin deserts which shares floristic components with both regions and was never part of the prehistoric Lake Lahontan (Reveal, 1979; Pavlik, 1989; Britten & Rust, 1996; Hafner, Reddington & Craig, 2006); (4) Colorado Plateau—the desert areas surrounding the four-corners region west of the Rocky Mountains and generally east of the Wasatch mountains of Utah (Reveal, 1979; Wilson & Pitts, 2010); (5) Owens Valley—a narrow region bounded by the eastern Sierra Nevada mountains to the west and the Inyo and White mountains to the east, this transition region also has strong floral and faunal similarities with both the Mojave and Great Basin deserts (Reveal, 1979; Andrews, Hardy & Giuliani, 1979; Macey, 1986; Pavlik, 1989; Van Dam & Matzke, 2016); and (6) Widespread—this was used for outgroup taxa whose ranges do not coincide with the regions listed above and instead extend into other areas of western North America.
Data management and availability
Label data from all specimens examined were digitized and are available online through the Symbiota Collections of Arthropods Network (SCAN; Gries, Gilbert & Franz, 2014, http://scan-bugs.org). Collecting events lacking GPS data on the label were georeferenced using Google Earth Pro version 7.3 and GEOLocate (www.geo-locate.org) as implemented in SCAN. Specimens from external institutions, which constituted the majority of those examined, were digitized using the SCAN Collection of Externally Processed Specimens (ARTSYS, see Johnston, Aalbu & Franz, 2018). All molecular and disarticulation vouchers are deposited in the MAJC and have images available with the pertinent specimen records on SCAN. Due to the fully digitized and available specimen data, verbatim label data are not included in the main text except for holotypes. Georeferenced specimen records were mapped using QGIS v3.2 which incorporated Google Earth satellite imagery.Full locality, institutional ownership, determination and georeferencing data for all specimens studied are available as a csv file in Data S1. A Darwin-Core Archive of all digitized specimen data is available in Data S2. Full sequence alignments and configuration files for divergence analyses are available in Data S3. Individual sequences are also deposited on GenBank with accession numbers: MN597189–MN597394.The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format will represent a published work according to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN, 1999, 2012), and hence the new names contained in the electronic version are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank Life Science Identifiers (LSIDs) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix http://zoobank.org/. The LSID for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:678EBFE3-6308-4FB8-8E93-184CEC9A15E7. The online version of this work is archived and available from the following digital repositories: PeerJ, PubMed Central and CLOCKSS.Amphidorini LeConte, 1862
Systematics
The complex nomenclatural and taxonomic history of Amphidorini has been summarized by Doyen & Lawrence (1979) and Johnston et al. (2015), and is only briefly described here. The tribe has frequently and historically been treated within the subfamily Tenebrioninae Latreille, 1802 (Bouchard et al., 2005, 2011; Bousquet et al., 2018), but recent phylogenetic studies place the Amphidorini in a clade with several other tribes in what has been referred to as the subfamily Opatrinae Brullé, 1832 (Aalbu et al., 2002; Kanda, 2017; Kamiński et al., 2018).The North American genera of this tribe can be separated from other members of Tenebrionidae by the following combination of characters: abdominal ventrites III–IV with visible membrane along hind margin; antennae lacking compound stellate sensoria; tarsal claws simple, not pectinate; penultimate tarsomeres not lobed beneath; elytra fused medially, hind wings reduced to small folds; paired defensive glands present between abdominal sternites VII and VIII, glands separate lacking a common volume, glands smooth, not annulated; mentum trilobed with mesal face more or less produced anterad, often concealing insertion of ligula; female paraproct and coxite short, coxite 1-segmented, with short subapical gonostyle; female with single, bursa-derived spermatheca.The tribe is currently comprised of seven genera, six of which are known only from North America. Published keys to genera (Aalbu et al., 2002; Johnston et al., 2015) are sufficient to separate Trogloderus from other Amphidorini, though a generic revision of the tribe is in progress (MA Johnston & AD Smith, 2020, in preparation).Type species T. costatus LeConte, 1879, by monotypyDiagnosis. Trogloderus (Fig. 2) can be distinguished from other members of Amphidorini by the following characters: body roughly sculptured, pronotum either tuberculate or roughly punctured. Elytron with four sharply carinate longitudinal costae, elytral suture costate or not. Tarsi lined beneath with yellow to castaneus spicules, never with tomentose pads, probasitarsus thickened ventrally near distal margin.
(A) Dorsal habitus, Trogloderus vandykei La Rivers. (B) Ventral habitus, Trogloderus vandykei La Rivers. ad, abdominal depression; dc, elytral discal costa; fs, femoral spine; pf, pronotal foveae; pg, prosternal groove; pp, prosternal process; sc, elytral sutural costa.Male: Body elongate, roughly sculptured, ferruginous to black. Length 9–16 mm. Width four to six mm.Head. As broad as long. Antenna 11-segmented, extending to posterior 2/3 of pronotum; antennomere III 1.5× as long as IV, IV–VII obconical, roughly as long as wide, VIII–XI wider than long, VIII with sensory patch of yellow setae along outer margin of apical face, IX–XI with sensory patch forming continuous ring around apical face. Labrum free, partially exposed, broader than long; anterior margin rounded laterally, deeply sinuate mesally; each lobe bearing tuft of short yellowish setae; dorsal surface punctate, each puncture bearing a long yellow seta, punctures becoming denser anteriorly; hypopharynx originating just posteriorly of anterior ventral margin, anterior hypopharyngeal sclerite ovoid, transverse, 1.5× wide as long. Mandibles (Figs. 3A and 3B) roughly symmetrical, bidentate, the left slightly larger than and overlapping the right at rest; dorsal face striate, more strongly so anterolaterally; lateral face with longitudinally elongate punctures, each bearing a single seta; ventral surface concave, smooth; mola present, strongly sclerotized, finely granulate; prostheca large, membranous, extends laterally around mola to form a large submola. Maxillae (Figs. 3C and 3D) ferruginous, symmetrical; cardo subtriangular, narrowing proximaly, lightly punctate; basistipes bearing thickened setae, subtriangular, narrowing distally, articulated with cardo basally and basigalea anterolaterally, mediostipes anteromesolly, and palpifer anterolaterally; mediostipes subtransverse, glabrous, articulated with lacinia distally; lacinia well developed, mesal surface bearing a terminal digitus followed proximally by robust lacinial teeth which become setae in basal 1/3; basigalea thin, articulated with distigalea apically, bearing fine, long setae; distigalea 1.5× longer than wide, anterior and mesal surface densely clothed with thick yellowish setae, dorsal surface bearing moderately separated, long yellowish setae; palpifer digitate ventrally, bearing stout setae; palpi with four palpomeres, palpomere I small, subtriangular, II elongate, obconical, III slightly shorter than II, clavate, IV securiform, apical surface bearing yellowish membranous sensorium. Mentum (Fig. 3E) trilobed, with mesal region of dorsal face produced anteriorly into arcuate lobe, covering insertion of ligula; ligula transverse, bearing two apical tufts of stout setae along dorsal face; labial palp with three palpomeres, palpomere I obconical, as long as wide, II clavate, 1.5× long as wide, III fusiform and evenly setose; hypopharyx moderately sclerotized along anterior margin, hypopharyngeal brush forming thickened longitudinal band from anterior margin of hypopharynx to posterior margin of mentum. Clypeus fused to frons, roughly sculptured, broadly sinute at middle, frontoclypeal suture indistinct to faintly traceable in teneral individuals. Frons usually slightly sunken, less roughly sculptured than clypeus, with slightly elevated bilobed tubercle centrally; epistomal lobes produced, distinctly offset from clypeus. Eyes entire, reniform, dorsal lobe 5–6 facets wide, ventral lobe 3 facets wide. Vertex at same level and contiguous with central tubercle of frons; becoming strongly granulate toward occiput. Submentum short, arcuate posteriorly, faintly evident; gular sutures diverging posteriorly, well rounded, gula less coarsely sculptured than surrounding head capsule.
Figure 3
Trogloderus mouthparts.
Dissected from MAJC0004230, T. major Johnston n.sp. (A) Left mandible, ventral view. (B) Right mandible, dorsal view. (C) Right maxilla, ventral view. (D) Left maxilla, dorsal view. (E) Labium, ventral view.
Trogloderus mouthparts.
Dissected from MAJC0004230, T. major Johnston n.sp. (A) Left mandible, ventral view. (B) Right mandible, dorsal view. (C) Right maxilla, ventral view. (D) Left maxilla, dorsal view. (E) Labium, ventral view.Thorax. Pronotum roughly sculptured; lateral margins strongly curved, crenulate along entire length, sinuate at posterior angle, anterior angles acute, projected, with longitudinal depression along midline, often separated into anterior and posterior foveae (Fig. 2A, pf); prosternal length from anterior margin to procoxae subequal to procoxal diameter; procoxae separated by approximately ½ procoxal diameter; prosternal process (Fig. 2B, pp) projected posteriorly; procoxal cavities closed posteriorly by postcoxal bridge of pronotum which meets the prosternal process mesally; pleural apophysis (Fig. 4A) directed anterodorsally, becoming laminar and longitudinally expanded near ventral surface of pronotum, with short dorsal coxal articulation extended mesally around basal 1/3; prosternal apophysis straight, extending dorsolaterally, terminating near dorsal margin of coxa. Mesonotum strongly transverse, triangular, densely papillose; scutellar shield wide and short, lacks papillae, strongly microsculptured; mesanepisternum subtriangular, narrowing posteroventrally, anterior 1/3 with integument thickened, papillose, offset from posterior 2/3 by posteriorly concave ridge demarking a section of thinner integument, punctate in posterior 1/3; mesepimeron short, fairly evenly punctate; mesoventrite with anterior 1/2 covered by prothorax at rest, posterior 1/2 projected ventrally between coxae, with longitudinal groove to receive prosternal process; mesocoxal cavities closed externally by mesoventrite, mesepimeron, and metaventrite; mesosternal apophyses extend anteriorly from apex of mesocoxal cavity, recurved dorsally and then posteriorly around anterior 1/4 of mesoventrite. Metanotum greatly reduced, prescutum forming narrow arch, strongly connected to the mesonotum, remainder of metanotum forming short, somewhat heavily sclerotized membrane, without discernable subregions; metepimeron forming narrow rod-like longitudinal sclerite along length of metathorax, concealed beneath elytron, posteriorly with short ventrally projected metepimeral process which is fused with metepisternum above metacoxal cavity; metepisternum elongate, subrectangular; metaventrite short, length less than mesocoxal diameter, antecoxal ridge deeply impressed above anterior coxal margin, discrimen not apparent; metacoxal cavities closed externally by metaventrite, metepisternum, metepimeral process, and first abdominal ventrite; metendosternite (Fig. 4A) stout, stalk broad, ventral longitudinal flange very well sclerotized, furcae as wide as stalk, relatively immovable, furcal apicies reflexed posterolaterally, forming horizontal pad for furca-trochanteralis muscle attachment, anterior tendons inserted at apical 1/4 of furcae. Elytra fused, suture elevated or not; elytron disc (Fig. 2A, dc) with four longitudinal carinate costae; epipleuron narrow throughout length, not or slightly widened anteriorly, attaining elytral apex posteriorly. Hind wings greatly reduced, forming veinless tubular sac, approximately the size of first abdominal spiracle.
Figure 4
Trogloderus internal morphology.
(A) Pterothorax venter, dorsal internal view; Metendosternite and right mesosternal apophysis highlighted; Dissected from MAJC0004244, T. warneri Johnston n.sp. (B) Defensive glands and abdominal ventrite V, dorsal internal view; Dissected from MAJC0004231, T. arcanus Johnston n.sp.
Trogloderus internal morphology.
(A) Pterothorax venter, dorsal internal view; Metendosternite and right mesosternal apophysis highlighted; Dissected from MAJC0004244, T. warneri Johnston n.sp. (B) Defensive glands and abdominal ventrite V, dorsal internal view; Dissected from MAJC0004231, T. arcanus Johnstonn.sp.Legs. Fore leg slightly enlarged, weakly fossorial; femur clavate, heavily punctate, dorsal anterior margin carinate from base to apical 1/5, ending in short recurved spine (Fig. 2A, fs); tibia with inner face excavated in basal 1/5, outer face carinate from base to near tarsal insertion, apex bearing row of ferruginous spicules dorsally, tibial spurs subequal, extending to apex of tarsomere II; tarsus bearing furriginous spicules, tarsomere I ventrally thickened at apex, maximum height equal to length, II–IV subequal, relatively short, about as tall as long, V slightly clavate, as long as II–IV combined; empodium minute, hidden within tarsal apex, bearing two yellowish setae; tarsal claws simple, evenly arcuate, 2/3 length of tarsomere V. Middle and hind legs similar to fore leg, tibia subcylindrical, not expanded; all tarsomeres simple, not thickened beneath.Abdomen. Five visible ventrites, ventrite I intercoxal process truncate, rectangular, twice as broad as long, I–III connate, fused to elytra laterally, III–IV with visible membrane posteriorly, I–II bearing variously developed longitudinal ridges demarking flattened abdominal depression (Fig. 2B, ad) in line with thoracic intercoxal region; tergites membranous, weakly sclerotized; paired defensive glands (Fig. 4B) present posterior to ventrite V (between sternites VII–VIII), glands lacking a common volume, each gland elongate, subfusiforme, extending anterior of ventrite II, membrane finely strigose, lacking annular pleats, gland openings centered around lateral 1/5.Terminalia. Tergite VIII weakly sclerotized, posterior margin evenly arcuate, bearing row of fine golden setae; sternite VIII weakly sclerotized, bilobed, deeply emarginate posteriorly, each lobe subtriangular, clothed ventrally and posteriorly with long yellowish setae, anterior deeply margin bisinuate, thickened into apodemes. Spicules V-shaped, fused anteriorly, 1.5× length of tergite VIII, spicule plates moderately small, 4× width of spicules, twice as long as wide. Adeagus (Fig. 5C) elongate, cylindrical; basal piece 4× as long as wide, lateral margins (alae) reflexed inwardly, leaving ventral face open, apicodorsal margin concave; parameres fused, 1/2 length of basal piece, widest basally, 1.5× long as wide, apical half curved ventrally; clavae (Fig. 5C) narrow, about as long as parameres, 1/6 maximum width of parameres; penis narrow, lightly sclerotized, fully hidden dorsally by parameres at rest.
Figure 5
Trogloderus terminalia.
(A) Female terminalia, dorsal view, showing bursa-derived spermatheca; T. vandykei La Rivers. (B) Female terminalia, ventral view, showing bursa copulatrix and oviduct; Dissected from MAJC0004243, T. major Johnston n.sp. (C) Male adeagus, ventral view; clavae and penis highlighted; T. vandykei La Rivers.
Trogloderus terminalia.
(A) Female terminalia, dorsal view, showing bursa-derived spermatheca; T. vandykei La Rivers. (B) Female terminalia, ventral view, showing bursa copulatrix and oviduct; Dissected from MAJC0004243, T. major Johnston n.sp. (C) Male adeagus, ventral view; clavae and penis highlighted; T. vandykei La Rivers.Female. As male but generally stouter, fore femoral spines variable, typically less developed than those of males, base of tibia generally not constricted, central abdominal groove less developed.Terminalia. Tergite VIII moderately sclerotized, posterior margin evenly arcuate, bearing golden setae; sternite VIII moderately sclerotized, evenly arcuate podsteriorly, bearing golden setae, fused medially to spiculum ventrale along anterior margin, spiculum ventrale 1.5× medial length of tergite VIII. Proctiger (Fig. 5A) slightly longer than wide, posterior margin weakly emarginate, bearing single row of short yellow setae. Paraproct subrectangular dorsally (Fig. 5A), subtriangular ventrally (Fig. 5B), bacculus obliquely pointed psoteromesally, thickened mesally. Coxite 1-segmented, subrectangular in dorsal view, narrowing posteriorly, subtriangular in ventral view, bacculus obliquely pointed anteromesally. Gonostyle short, inserted ventrally, at most weakly visible from above. Bursa copulatrix (Fig. 5B) about 2× length of coxite, bearing single spermatheca (Fig. 5A) off of duct from anterior margin with single long spermathecal gland.
Variation and natural history
Sexual dimorphism is primarily observed in the fore tibiae and abdominal ventrites. The fore tibiae of males are generally more explanate along the outer edge and are more strongly constricted proximally. The femoral spines are often slightly stronger in the males as well, where they pair with the constricted tibiae to form a grasping mechanism—presumably used to hold the females legs or antennae during copulation. The abdominal depression also tends to be stronger in males, with the marginal ridge more produced and the central region more depressed. This is also assumed to help the male in positioning during copulation.Relatively little is known of Trogloderus biology. Adults have not been successfully cultured in the lab and larvae and pupae remain unknown and undescribed from the wild. Adult beetles are able to burrow into loose sand, where the immature stages presumably live. More commonly, adults are observed emerging from mammal burrows after dark where they seem to take shelter underground during the day. Like other Amphidorini, adults can also be found, though not particularly abundantly, under rocks or loose boards. Trogloderus are very active at night, and seem to travel good distances across open ground likely in search of food, mates, or new sites to shelter during the day.Collection records and field observations indicate that this genus is restricted to habitats with loose sand. While the largest populations seem to be from deep aeolian sand formations, they can also be found in areas of fine loose sand along rivers and across desert flats, for example, in small sand hummocks around the base of desert shrubs.
Key to the species of Trogloderus
Diagnostic utility of characters
The extreme sculpturing of Trogloderus makes the genus readily recognizable among Amphidorini, but also seems to magnify—in the context of species identification—the relatively broad individual and geographic intraspecific variation found throughout the tribe (Triplehorn & Thomas, 2012; Johnston, 2015, 2016). The female ovipositor has been heavily relied upon to classify species into genera and subgenera (Blaisdell, 1909; Triplehorn & Thomas, 2012; Johnston, 2015, 2016), yet it is fairly constant throughout Trogloderus and was found unreliable for species identification. Male terminalia can be diagnostic for some species, but not for all (Somerby, 1972; Aalbu, Smith & Triplehorn, 2012). Within Trogloderus, the basic shape of the parameres can sometimes aid in distinguishing some species from each other by examining the curvature of the lateral margins, but do not alone reliably distinguish one species from all others.General facies, elytral sculpturing, and body size were found to be largely unreliable for species recognition as they can vary within populations and especially between populations. It is not uncommon to find locally homogenous populations to have strong differences between them. Whether this is due to some environmental variable such as food or water availability or simply stochastic due to limited gene flow is unclear. The sculpturing of the pronotum and head seems to be more stable within species and are heavily relied upon in the following identification key.Though coloration was previously used as a secondary diagnostic character (La Rivers, 1946; Papp, 1961), it is here found to be unusable for species determinations. Rather, it seems that the cuticle of adult Trogloderus takes a fairly long time to fully harden and that more teneral specimens exhibit a red coloration, which then matures to a darker black in the longest-lived individuals. This is based on the observation that in almost every large series known there is a spectrum of red to castaneus to black individuals. Specimens with a brighter red coloration seem to have thinner cuticle (personal observation while pinning specimens) and even less strongly sclerotized terminalia. This is perhaps a strategy for these desert-dwelling beetles to limit the duration of the potentially more susceptible immature stages in preference of a longer hardening period as an adult. It is not clear whether the teneral adults are reproductively viable as no eggs have been observed in such individuals when dissected, and this could be an example of Reifungsfraß, the need for a maturation feeding period (see McNee, Wood & Storer, 2000).Dichotomous key to the species of adult Trogloderus1 Pronotal surface distinctly tuberculate21′ Pronotal surface not tuberculate, heavily punctate to cribrate52 (1) Each elytron with large subapical tubercle at outer carinal terminus; pronotal foveae delimited laterally by raised longitudinal ridges (Mojave Desert)2′ Elytra without posterior tubercles; pronotum lacking elevated ridges, foveae lined by tubercles originating from same surface as those of the disc (widespread)33 (2′) Posterior pronotal angles more or less inflated; lateral margins of pronotal disc slightly depressed, lacking tubercles (western Colorado Plateau)3′ Posterior pronotal angles not at all inflated; lateral regions of pronotal disc not depressed, tubercles relatively evenly dispersed from foveae to lateral margins44 (3′) Male parameres triangular, evenly tapering from base to apex; elytral carinae often granulately tuberculate on sides (west of Kaibab Plateau)4′ Male parameres distinctly constricted near base, then evenly tapering to apex; elytral carinae usually lacking tubercles on sides (east of Kaibab Plateau)5 (1′) Pronotal dorsum bilobed in anterior view; pronotum strongly explanate laterally; pronotal foveae joined into single longitudinal groove (Mojave Desert)5′ Pronotum evenly convex in anterior view; pronotum weakly to moderately explanate laterally; pronotal foveae variable, often distinctly separated (widespread)66 (5′) Pronotum cribrately punctured, margins of punctures strongly elevated; intervals between elytral carinae bearing short, transverse secondary ridges6′ Pronotum heavily punctate, margins of punctures not strongly elevated; intervals between elytral carinae usually smooth, lacking well-defined secondary ridges77 (6′) Propleurae lacking tubercles on dorsal half, never with tubercles anteriorly just underneath pronotal margin; pronotal foveae joined into single well-demarked longitudinal groove7′ Propleurae wth tubercles in dorsal half, at least anteriorly underneath pronotal margin; pronotal foveae variable, usually not forming single longitudinal groove88 (7′) Epistoma roughly punctured, individual punctures evident above antennal insertion; pronotal punctures fairly evenly circular, discrete; elytral costae moderately to strongly produced; male parameres broadly triangular in dorsal view, sides straight and evenly tapered (southern Owens Valley)8′ Epistoma finely to roughly tuberculate, individual punctures not evident above antennal insertions; pronotal punctures often longitudinally oval, sometimes coalescent anteriorly; elytral costae weakly to moderately produced; male parameres narrowly triangular in dorsal view, sides gently to moderately arcuately concave (widespread)99 (8′) Frontoclypeal suture forming a complete transverse ridge, frons apex below the plane of clypeus base; male parameres broadly triangular, evenly converging; prosternal process horizontal, on the same plane as the prosternum between the procoxae; punctures larger (northern Great Basin)9′ Frontoclypeal suture usually not forming complete transverse ridge, mesal region of frons apex on the same plane as clypeus; male parameres usually noticeably constricted near base, with sides slightly convexly arcuate; prosternal process often narrowed at posterior procoxal margin, sometimes dorsally offset from plane of prosternum; pronotal punctures usually smaller (Lahontan Trough including Mono Lake region of Owens Valley)urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:0BCDA9E8-F615-41B9-9376-62778B0958EEFigures 6E, 7A and 8
Figure 6
Trogloderus species, dorsal habitus.
(A) T. tuberculatus Blaisdell (non-type). (B) T. verpus Johnston n.sp. (holotype). (C) T. warneri Johnston n.sp. (holotype). (D) T. skillmani Johnston n.sp. (holotype). (E) T. arcanus Johnston n.sp. (holotype). (F) T. costatus LeConte (non-type). (G) T. nevadus La Rivers (non-type). (H) T. major Johnston n.sp. (holotype). (I) T. kandai Johnston n.sp. (holotype).
Figure 7
Trogloderus species, adeagus dorsal view.
(A) T. arcanus Johnston n.sp. (B) T. costatus LeConte. (C) T. kandai Johnston n.sp. (D) T. major Johnston n.sp. (E) T. nevadus La Rivers. (F) T. skillmani Johnston n.sp. (G) T. tuberculatus Blaisdell. (H) T. vandykei La Rivers. (I) T. verpus Johnston n.sp. (J) T. warneri Johnston n.sp.
Figure 8
Distribution map, Trogloderus arcanus Johnston n.sp., T. costatus LeConte, T. kandai Johnston n.sp.
(A) T. tuberculatus Blaisdell (non-type). (B) T. verpus Johnstonn.sp. (holotype). (C) T. warneri Johnston n.sp. (holotype). (D) T. skillmani Johnstonn.sp. (holotype). (E) T. arcanus Johnstonn.sp. (holotype). (F) T. costatus LeConte (non-type). (G) T. nevadus La Rivers (non-type). (H) T. major Johnston n.sp. (holotype). (I) T. kandai Johnston n.sp. (holotype).
Trogloderus species, adeagus dorsal view.
(A) T. arcanus Johnstonn.sp. (B) T. costatus LeConte. (C) T. kandai Johnston n.sp. (D) T. major Johnston n.sp. (E) T. nevadus La Rivers. (F) T. skillmani Johnstonn.sp. (G) T. tuberculatus Blaisdell. (H) T. vandykei La Rivers. (I) T. verpus Johnstonn.sp. (J) T. warneri Johnston n.sp.
Distribution map, Trogloderus arcanus Johnston n.sp., T. costatus LeConte, T. kandai Johnston n.sp.
Both maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses converged on a single topology with moderately strong support throughout (Fig. 11). Within the outgroups, the genus Eleodes Eschscholtz was notably recovered as paraphyletic with respect to the genera Neobaphion Blaisdell, Embaphion Say, Lariversius Blaisdell, and Trogloderus. This raises broader questions regarding the naturalness of the current classification of the tribal concept as a whole (Bousquet et al., 2018); however, the sampling for this study is not sufficient to justify more substantive classificatory changes. Trogloderus was recovered as monophyletic, and is further subdivided into two strongly supported clades—that is, (1) the “tuberculate-pronotum clade” containing all species that bear distinct tubercles on the pronotal disc, and (2) the “reticulate-pronotum clade” containing all species whose pronotal discs have deep punctures that make the intervals appear to be elevated into reticulate sculpturing. All Trogloderus species as circumscribed above were similarly found to be monophyletic with posterior probabilities of 1 and bootstrap support of 95 or higher.
Figure 11
Phylogenetic reconstruction of Trogloderus.
Tree shown is from the MrBayes analysis, numbers above branches are posterior probabilities, numbers below the branches arethe corresponding RAxML bootstrap support values. Outgroup specimens belonging to the genus Eleodes are highlighted. The monophyletic Trogloderus is indicated by a box, and the reciprocally monophyletic Reticulate-pronotum and Tuberculate-pronotum clades are indicated by vertical bars.
Phylogenetic reconstruction of Trogloderus.
Tree shown is from the MrBayes analysis, numbers above branches are posterior probabilities, numbers below the branches arethe corresponding RAxML bootstrap support values. Outgroup specimens belonging to the genus Eleodes are highlighted. The monophyletic Trogloderus is indicated by a box, and the reciprocally monophyletic Reticulate-pronotum and Tuberculate-pronotum clades are indicated by vertical bars.The Trogloderus tuberculate-pronotum clade contains four species and is well resolved (Fig. 11), with internal nodes between species all having posterior probabilities greater than 0.95 and bootstrap values above 85. The relationships between these species imply an east-to-west diversification pattern. The easternmost species, T. verpus (Fig. 10) known from the Colorado Plateau, is recovered as sister to a clade containing the remaining three species. The latter clade shows the same trend with its easternmost species, T. warneri (Fig. 10) distributed east of the Kaibab Plateau, sister to the species T. skillmani (Fig. 9) and T. tuberculatus (Fig. 10), which are distributed west of the Kaibab Plateau.The Trogloderus reticulate-pronotum clade contains six species (Fig. 11) with notably western distributions, ranging from the Mojave Desert to the Great Basin. The relationships between these species are less well resolved than for those of the tuberculate-pronotum clade, though each species is supported as monophyletic with posterior probabilities of 1 and bootstrap support values of 95 or higher. While analyses converged on a single topology, the underlying data do not give unequivocal support to the relationships of the early-diverging species. Trogloderus arcanus, T. vandykei, and T. nevadus are inferred to have diverged before a clade containing the other three reticulate-pronotum species. However, these branches all have posterior probabilities lower than 0.95 and bootstrap support values below 75. The clade consisting of T. kandai, T. costatus, and T. major is strongly supported with a posterior probability of 1 and a bootstrap support value of 83. The reticulate-pronotum clade seems to indicate a latitudinal pattern to diversification. Neither of the two sympatric pairs of species in this clade, the southern T. vandykei with T. major and the northern T. costatus with T. nevadus, form monophyletic groups. This supports the notion that multiple vicariant or dispersal events between these regions were involved in the diversification of this lineage.Trogloderus arcanus and T. nevadus exhibit longer branch lengths between sampled populations within the species than any others sampled for this study (Fig. 11). This may simply be due to limited sampling, but further molecular and morphological investigations from the under-sampled regions of Nevada may provide evidence for the two herein circumscribed species to represent more complex taxonomic groups.
Phylogenetic dating analyses
Trogloderus is here inferred to be relatively young, with the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) for the genus occurring during the late Miocene or earliest Pliocene (Fig. 12). Furthermore, most speciation events are inferred to have taken place during the Pleistocene. Based on these inferences, it seems evident that La Rivers (1946) hypothesis of an ancient lineage approaching extinction can be refuted for Trogloderus. Instead, Trogloderus seems to postdate the Neogene Uplift, having originated and diversified in conjunction with the recent desert formations of western North America (Wilson & Pitts, 2010).
Figure 12
Diversification estimates for Trogloderus.
(A) Timetree generated from BEAST showing inferred median node ages. (B) Same showing 95% highest posterior density for node ages. (C) Timetree generated from RelTime showing inferred median node ages. (D) Same showing 95% confidence intervals for node ages.
Diversification estimates for Trogloderus.
(A) Timetree generated from BEAST showing inferred median node ages. (B) Same showing 95% highest posterior density for node ages. (C) Timetree generated from RelTime showing inferred median node ages. (D) Same showing 95% confidence intervals for node ages.Dating analyses for Trogloderus using BEAST (Figs. 12A and 12B) inferred comparatively older dates than RelTime (Figs. 12C and 12D) but are not particularly reliable, having failed to converge after 500 million generations. The MRCA of Trogloderus was dated to 10.27 mya, and ages for both calibrated nodes were older than expected, namely 4.03 mya for the Inyo-White mountains calibration, with the prior mean set at 2.5 mya, and 1 mya for the Grand Canyon calibration, with a prior mean set at 0.83 mya. The estimated sample sizes for mutation rates did not exceed 10 and those for calibration times and tree height were well under 100. Additional analyses under different locus partition and model schemes and modified taxon inclusion similarly failed to converge. This may be due either to limitations with the underlying molecular dataset, or because the coalescent-based priors may be inappropriate for this class of data. The results using the Yule model are shown in Figs. 12A and 12B, displaying the median node age and 95% highest posterior density respectively. Due to this lack of convergence, the timetree from RelTime was used for subsequent historical biogeographic inference.RelTime analyses infer Trogloderus to have originated in the earliest Pliocene with most current species arising during the mid-Pleistocene. Divergence estimates from RelTime were consistently later than those inferred from BEAST, with the MRCA of Trogloderus dated to 5.2 mya, and the dates of 2.5 and 0.56 mya for the calibration clades split by the Inyo-White mountains and the Grand Canyon respectively. Median node ages and 95% confidence intervals inferred from RelTime are shown in Figs. 12C and 12D respectively.The Sierra Nevada mountains offer one line of geological evidence for the age of Trogloderus to be closer to 5 my as the RelTime analysis infers. The timing of the uplift of the Sierra Nevada Mountains remains contested in the geological literature (Wilson & Pitts, 2010), but significant evidence suggests that the majority of the uplift occurred between 5 and 8 mya and was a primary force in creating the Great Basin and Mojave deserts (Jones, Farmer & Unruh, 2004; Wilson & Pitts, 2010). Were Trogloderus older than this uplift event, we might expect them to be present outside of the intermountain region. Indeed, members of the genus are able to endure cold winters from central Wyoming as well as the extreme heat from Death Valley and surrounding environs. Beyond living in sandy substrates, there are no other clear environmental limits to their distribution.The MRCA of all included Amphidorini taxa was dated to 7.97 mya with a 95% confidence interval of 1.5–14.5 mya using RelTime. This date range, though the first inferred for this fossil-lacking tribe, is younger than expected based on phylogenetic work at the family level. The new-world Amphidorini appear to be sister the old-world tribe Blaptini Leach, 1815 (Kanda, 2017). The latter was estimated by Kergoat et al. (2014) to have an origin closer to 55 mya, but no members of Amphidorini were included in that study. The young age inferred here for the tribe may again be a symptom of low species-level taxon sampling. Hypotheses about the origin and diversification of Amphidorini will have to wait for future studies with a broader scope.
Historical biogeographic estimation
The MRCA of Trogloderus was inferred to inhabit the Colorado Plateau (Fig. 13), where the majority of the tuberculate-pronotum clade still resides. The ancestors of the reticulate-pronotum clade are inferred to have dispersed into the Lahonton Trough, and from there radiated into the Mojave Desert, Great Basin, and Owens Valley. Three separate radiations into the Mojave Desert are inferred for the three species sympatric there. The insights given by this biogeographic estimation for specific subregions are discussed in detail below.
Figure 13
Historical biogeographic estimation of Trogloderus.
Generated from BioGeoBEARS using the DEC+J model. Nodes colored by inferred most likely biogeographic region.
Historical biogeographic estimation of Trogloderus.
Generated from BioGeoBEARS using the DEC+J model. Nodes colored by inferred most likely biogeographic region.Historical biogeographic estimation in BioGeoBEARS supports the use of a model incorporating founder-event jump dispersal (Matzke, 2014). This process is not only important for taxa distributed across islands (Matzke, 2014; Zhang et al., 2017), but also for taxa living on sand dunes or other isolated habitats which can functionally act the same as islands (Van Dam & Matzke, 2016). The DEC model resulted in a most likely estimation with a log likelihood score of −43.6. The DEC+J model, which employs a single extra parameter for jump dispersal, produced an estimation with a log likelihood of −26.8. By performing a likelihood ratio test (Huelsenbeck & Crandall, 1997), the DEC+J model provides a significantly better fit to the data than the DEC model at a P-value of 1e−5.
Discussion of the biogeography of the Intermountain Region
The historical biogeography of Trogloderus supports the distinction of the Lahontan Trough as a unique element of the Intermountain Region, and is the first to provide molecular and historical biogeographic support for the area to play a part in the migration of clades throughout the intermountain region. The appraisal of the biogeography of the Intermountain Region by Reveal (1979) was a landmark study based largely on floristic distributions and extensive field observations. A comprehensive biogeographic review of the region has not been published since. One major hypothesis put forth in this work is that the Lahontan Trough acts as a migration route into and out of the region. Following the establishment of the Lahontan Trough as a biogeographic entity by Reveal (1979), multiple studies have found populations from this area to be distinct from populations of the same species from the Mojave and Great Basin deserts (Britten & Rust, 1996; Hafner, Reddington & Craig, 2006), and at least one psammophilic plant is unique to the area (Pavlik, 1989). Together, these studies suggest that the Lahontan Trough is likely to play an important role in the evolutionary history of any sand-dune restricted or dispersal-limited taxa in the region.The newly described T. kandai is the first sand-dune species known to be restricted to the southern Owens Valley. The region has been relatively well studied for changes in plant communities (Koehler & Anderson, 1995; Elmore, Mustard & Manning, 2003) and fish conservation (Galicia et al., 2015). However, the sand dunes, which are comprised of particles originating from the surrounding Sierra Nevada and Coso mountains (Lancaster et al., 2015), have not had any beetle species reported only from them (Andrews, Hardy & Giuliani, 1979). Whether T. kandai is truly the only species restricted to this habitat or if there are others waiting to be described, additional faunal surveys of the sand dunes around the dry Owens Lake should be completed to understand what further importance this area may have for Intermountain biodiversity.The three sympatric species of Trogloderus with independent dispersal events into the Mojave Desert are consistent with the inference of an eastern origin for the genus with a continual movement westward. The relatively recent timing for incursions into the Mojave Desert is also consistent with the fact that Trogloderus does not range south into the dunes of the Colorado and Sonoran deserts (Aalbu & Smith, 2014; Johnston, Aalbu & Franz, 2018). The relationships of the dune systems within the Mojave Desert were subdivided and well-tested by Van Dam & Matzke (2016), but are here treated as a single unit. The barriers between these sand systems within this area seem to not be a major limiting factor for Trogloderus as T. tuberculatus and T. major are fairly evenly spread throughout.The predicted footprint of the prehistoric lakes making up the Bouse Embayement is almost identical to the distribution of T. vandykei. This region, spanning along the lower Colorado River between Arizona and California (Wilson & Pitts, 2010), was covered by three large prehistoric lakes that ran from just north of present-day Bullhead City, Arizona south past Blythe, Arizona. The drainage was bounded along the south by the Chocolate Mountains and extended west into the Bristol basin (Spencer et al., 2013). These lakes likely appeared around 4.9 mya and drained relatively shortly thereafter when the Colorado River eventually connected to the Gulf of California (Spencer et al., 2013). It is very likely that the sand derived from these lakes and the geological boundaries that formed their drainage basins have shaped the diversification and distribution of T. vandykei. The lakes are also implicated in genetically structuring the populations of a desert scorpion (Graham et al., 2017). The Bouse Embayment is further supported as a separate biogeographic entity based on the distribution of other psammophilic Tenebrionidae. Though the Algodones dunes are in extremely close proximity to the southern edge of the Bouse Formation, not only does Trogloderus not cross over the Chocolate Mountains and occur there, but multiple species restricted to the Algodones and Gran Desierto de Altar similarly do not extend north into the Bouse Embayment (Johnston, Aalbu & Franz, 2018).Within the Colorado Plateau, three subregions are suggested by Trogloderus distributions. The distribution of the eastern T. verpus is somewhat surprising in that no previous biogeographic hypotheses were found to explain why it does not range as far west as the Vermillion Cliffs. One explanation is competitive exclusion within the genus, and this is somewhat supported by the populations near Moenkopi, Arizona. Both T. verpus and T. warneri occur on these dunes, and all studied specimens of T. verpus were significantly smaller than those of T. warneri. However, throughout the rest of its range, T. verpus has roughly the same body size as T. warneri. Another possible explanation is that the Kaiparowitz Formation around Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument acts as a barrier between sand systems from the Kaibito and Moenkopi plateaus of north-central Arizona and those from the northern reaches of the greater Colorado Plateau. The Kaiparowitz Formation, along with the Wasatch Mountains, formed the western boundary of the western interior seaway during the Cretaceous (Hettinger et al., 1996; Roberts, 2007) and is implicated in the speciation of large dinosaurs at the time (Sampson et al., 2010). No studies of modern taxa that study this boundary were found. Even though the Colorado River and its tributaries have carved large canyons through this formation, it may still be a significant barrier between sand-dune restricted taxa. The third subregion is separated from the others by the Kaibab Plateau. This tall formation separates T. warneri from its eastern T. skillmani and T. tuberculatus. The effect of the Kaibab Plateau on dune-dwelling taxa is apparently similarly unstudied.
Conclusions
The revision and historical biogeography of Trogloderus help to bring the biogeographic trends of the Intermountain Region into focus. The cohesive distributional patterns of Trogloderus species build upon the foundational work of Reveal (1979) and highlight regions that should be critically evaluated during future phylogenetic, taxonomic, and biogeographic studies. It is hoped that continued research on the under-studied biodiversity of the Intermountain Region will continue to bring clarity to the relationships between sand-dune systems of western North America.
Full digitized specimen data.
Each record corresponds to a unique specimen examined for this study. Full collection event, determination, owning institution, and georeferencing data are provided.Click here for additional data file.Each record corresponds to a unique specimen examined for this study. Full collection event, determination, owning institution, and georeferencing data are provided.Click here for additional data file.
DNA sequence data and analysis files for Trogloderus phylogenetic and historical biogeographic inferences.
Alignments and input files are provided for molecular phylogenetic and historical biogeographic analyses presented in this study.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Patrice Bouchard; Yves Bousquet; Anthony E Davies; Miguel A Alonso-Zarazaga; John F Lawrence; Chris H C Lyal; Alfred F Newton; Chris A M Reid; Michael Schmitt; S Adam Slipiński; Andrew B T Smith Journal: Zookeys Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 1.546
Authors: Koichiro Tamura; Fabia Ursula Battistuzzi; Paul Billing-Ross; Oscar Murillo; Alan Filipski; Sudhir Kumar Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-11-05 Impact factor: 11.205