| Literature DB >> 31741652 |
Vivian M Sueiras1, Floriane Devaux1, Benjamin Smith1, James Lai1, Wyndham Batchelor1, Nikita Y Likht2, Vincent T Moy3, Noël M Ziebarth1,3.
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify the partition coefficient and the diffusion coefficient of metal-carrier proteins in the human lens capsule as a function of age.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31741652 PMCID: PMC6828993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Vis ISSN: 1090-0535 Impact factor: 2.367
Summary of donor age, postmortem time, half maximum recovery time, diffusion coefficient, and partition coefficient of all samples included in this study.
| Age (years) | Postmortem Time (days) | Half Maximum Recovery Time (s) | Diffusion Coefficient ( | Partition Coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALBUMIN | |||||
| | 20 | 4 | 26.89 | 0.102 | 0.09 |
| | 30 | 7 | 16.39 | 0.167 | 0.33 |
| | 31 | 8 | 27.75 | 0.099 | 0.16 |
| | 43 | 7 | 16.38 | 0.168 | 0.2 |
| | 46 | 4 | 9.03 | 0.304 | 0.28 |
| | 52 | 3 | 17.35 | 0.158 | 0.21 |
| | 53 | 9 | 15.95 | 0.172 | 0.37 |
| | 57 | 5 | 10.49 | 0.262 | 0.33 |
| | 60 | 6 | 24.84 | 0.11 | 0.54 |
| | 65 | 4 | 17.22 | 0.159 | 0.27 |
| | 65 | 6 | 20.65 | 0.133 | 0.71 |
| CERULOPLASMIN | |||||
| | 24 | 7 | 39.45 | 0.07 | 0.42 |
| | 40 | 5 | 31.72 | 0.087 | 0.46 |
| | 48 | 7 | 39.15 | 0.07 | 0.51 |
| | 53 | 4 | 29.1 | 0.094 | 0.55 |
| | 55 | 3 | 37.46 | 0.073 | 0.51 |
| | 56 | 6 | 33.25 | 0.083 | 0.53 |
| | 62 | 7 | 47.36 | 0.058 | 0.95 |
| | 63 | 3 | 35.11 | 0.079 | 0.9 |
| TRANSFERRIN | |||||
| | 20 | 4 | 13.65 | 0.201 | 0.19 |
| | 31 | 9 | 11.09 | 0.247 | 0.61 |
| | 43 | 4 | 19.4 | 0.141 | 0.62 |
| | 46 | 9 | 11.77 | 0.233 | 0.35 |
| | 48 | 7 | 21.5 | 0.128 | 0.38 |
| | 52 | 6 | 15.05 | 0.182 | 0.25 |
| | 55 | 3 | 26.83 | 0.102 | 0.96 |
| | 57 | 7 | 16.95 | 0.162 | 1.17 |
| | 60 | 7 | 15.39 | 0.178 | 0.82 |
| | 62 | 7 | 19.42 | 0.141 | 0.84 |
| | 65 | 4 | 22.91 | 0.12 | 0.68 |
| 65 | 9 | 13.11 | 0.209 | 0.75 | |
Figure 1FRAP protocol. A: Confocal image of a three-dimensional (3D) z-stack of the anterior capsule used to locate an area within the sample. Crosshairs indicate the starting location of the fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) protocol. B: Designated regions of interest (ROIs). Bleached ROI, red circle of 20 µm diameter, is the area to be bleached. Reference ROI, blue circle of 15 µm diameter, is identified for photobleaching correction. Observed ROI, green circle of 7 µm diameter, is the area monitored for fluorescence recovery. C: Time-lapse images of the full field of view during the FRAP protocol. D: Quantitative monitoring of the fluorescence intensity within the ROIs. The time to half maximum recovery is indicated.
Figure 2Confocal microscopy cross-sectional images showing a bright band of fluorescently labeled transferrin outside the lens capsule from a young donor (left); in contrast, fluorescently labeled transferrin is seen inside the lens capsule from an older donor (right). O: outside the lens capsule, LC: inside the lens capsule, E: epithelial cells, L: lens. The scale bar represents 10 μm.
Figure 3Half maximum recovery time and diffusion coefficient measured within the anterior lens capsule for all samples. Ceruloplasmin movement was statistically significantly slower than albumin and transferrin.
Figure 4For all three proteins investigated, the partition coefficient statistically significantly increases with age. This suggests that the anterior lens capsule of the young lens is impermeable to heavy metal carriers, but that the anterior lens capsule of the old lens is fully permeable to heavy metal carriers.