Literature DB >> 31741220

A Laboratory Bioassay Method to Assess the Use of Toxic Bait on Anastrepha fraterculus (Weidemann 1830).

M Z Nunes1, D Bernardi2,3, C A Baronio1, J Pasinato4, M Baldin4, M Botton4.   

Abstract

The lack of standardization of bioassays for the evaluation of toxic bait toxicity on the South American fruit fly, Anastrepha fraterculus (Weidemann 1830), has led to erroneous interpretations of assay results. The objective of this study was to develop a methodology for the standardization and validation of toxicological tests on A. fraterculus toxic bait using the Success™ 0.02CB formulation (80 mg L-1 of spinosad). Anastrepha fraterculus adults, obtained from larvae reared on an artificial diet, showed higher susceptibility (LT50 = 48.96 h) than adults from larvae reared on cattley guava (LT50 = 53.83 h) and mango fruit (LT50 = 53.55 h). Anastrepha fraterculus adults at the age of five (LT50 = 65.30 h), 15 (LT50 = 59.01 h), and 30 (LT50 = 55.53 h) days presented similar toxicity. The consumption of toxic bait (4.74 mg) increased at 15 days, a fact also observed with insects without food deprivation. In addition, the absence of a food source (artificial diet) with the toxic bait significantly reduced adult mortality time by 7 h (LT50 = 57.42 h). In relation to exposure time, adults exposed to toxic bait for 1 h reduced consumption by 25%; however, they showed the same susceptibility as insects exposed to 2 (LT50 = 55.72 h), 4 (LT50 = 57.64 h), and 8 h (LT50 = 57.76 h). However, with 24 h of food deprivation, they had a higher susceptibility (LT50 = 46.48 h). Five-day-old A. fraterculus adults fed an artificial diet before being deprived of food for 12 or 24 h, then exposed to toxic bait for 4 h in the absence of a food source, are considered optimum conditions to evaluate the toxicity of toxic bait.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Methodology; South American fruit fly; spinosad

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31741220     DOI: 10.1007/s13744-019-00728-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neotrop Entomol        ISSN: 1519-566X            Impact factor:   1.434


  7 in total

1.  Bioassay Method for Toxicity Studies of Toxic Bait Formulations to Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae).

Authors:  C A Baronio; D Bernardi; M Z Nunes; J Pasinato; F R M Garcia; M Botton
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 1.434

2.  Field response of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) to ceralure B1: evaluations of enantiomeric B1 ratios on fly captures.

Authors:  Eric B Jang; Ashot Khrimian; Timothy C Holler; Victor Casana-Giner; Slawomir Lux; Lori A Carvalho
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. 1925.

Authors:  W S Abbott
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 0.917

4.  Attraction of apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: tephritidae) of different physiological states to odour-baited traps in the presence and absence of food.

Authors:  J Rull; R J Prokopy
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.750

5.  Efficacy of attract-and-kill devices for the control of Ceratitis capitata.

Authors:  Vicente Navarro-Llopis; Jaime Primo; Sandra Vacas
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.845

6.  Age Related Assessment of Sugar and Protein Intake of Ceratitis capitata in ad libitum Conditions and Modeling Its Relation to Reproduction.

Authors:  Nikos A Kouloussis; Petros T Damos; Charalambos S Ioannou; Constantinos Tsitsoulas; Nikos T Papadopoulos; David Nestel; Dimitris S Koveos
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 7.  Detoxifying symbionts in agriculturally important pest insects.

Authors:  Tijs J M van den Bosch; Cornelia U Welte
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 5.813

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.