Deniz Alis1, Omer Bagcilar2, Yeseren Deniz Senli2, Mert Yergin3, Cihan Isler4, Naci Kocer2, Civan Islak2, Osman Kizilkilic2. 1. Department of Radiology, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Halkali/Istanbul, Turkey. drdenizalis@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, KMPasa, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. Department of Software Engineering and Applied Sciences, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Turkey. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, KMPasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the performance of texture analysis of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in predicting IDH1 status in high-grade gliomas (HGG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 142 patients with HGG were included in the study. IDH1 mutation was present in 48 of 142 HGG (33.8%). Patients were randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 96) and the validation cohort (n = 46). Texture features were extracted via regions of interest on axial T2WI FLAIR, post-contrast T1WI, and ADC maps covering the whole volume of the tumors. The training cohort was used to train the random forest classifier, and the diagnostic performance of the pre-trained model was tested on the validation cohort. RESULTS: The random forest model of conventional MRI sequences and ADC images achieved diagnostic accuracy of 82.2% and 80.4% in predicting IDH1 status in the validation cohorts, respectively. The combined model of T2WI FLAIR, post-contrast T1WI, and ADC images exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy equating 86.94% in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: Texture analysis of conventional MRI sequences enhanced by ML analysis can accurately predict the IDH1 status of HGG. Adding textural analysis of ADC maps to conventional MRI results in incremental diagnostic performance.
PURPOSE: To assess the performance of texture analysis of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in predicting IDH1 status in high-grade gliomas (HGG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 142 patients with HGG were included in the study. IDH1 mutation was present in 48 of 142 HGG (33.8%). Patients were randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 96) and the validation cohort (n = 46). Texture features were extracted via regions of interest on axial T2WI FLAIR, post-contrast T1WI, and ADC maps covering the whole volume of the tumors. The training cohort was used to train the random forest classifier, and the diagnostic performance of the pre-trained model was tested on the validation cohort. RESULTS: The random forest model of conventional MRI sequences and ADC images achieved diagnostic accuracy of 82.2% and 80.4% in predicting IDH1 status in the validation cohorts, respectively. The combined model of T2WI FLAIR, post-contrast T1WI, and ADC images exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy equating 86.94% in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: Texture analysis of conventional MRI sequences enhanced by ML analysis can accurately predict the IDH1 status of HGG. Adding textural analysis of ADC maps to conventional MRI results in incremental diagnostic performance.
Authors: Martin A Lewis; Balaji Ganeshan; Anna Barnes; Sotirios Bisdas; Zane Jaunmuktane; Sebastian Brandner; Raymond Endozo; Ashley Groves; Stefanie C Thust Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Michael Weller; Stefan M Pfister; Wolfgang Wick; Monika E Hegi; Guido Reifenberger; Roger Stupp Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: A Biller; S Badde; A Nagel; J-O Neumann; W Wick; A Hertenstein; M Bendszus; F Sahm; N Benkhedah; J Kleesiek Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Joost J M van Griethuysen; Andriy Fedorov; Chintan Parmar; Ahmed Hosny; Nicole Aucoin; Vivek Narayan; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Steve Pieper; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Akifumi Hagiwara; Hiroyuki Tatekawa; Jingwen Yao; Catalina Raymond; Richard Everson; Kunal Patel; Sergey Mareninov; William H Yong; Noriko Salamon; Whitney B Pope; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Linda M Liau; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 4.379