Suzan C M Cochius-den Otter1, Florian Kipfmueller2, Brenda C M de Winter3, Karel Allegaert4,5, Dick Tibboel4, Andreas Mueller2, Birgit C P Koch3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Intensive Care and Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015, CN, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. s.denotter@erasmusmc.nl. 2. Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, University Children's Hospital, Bonn, Germany. 3. Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Intensive Care and Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015, CN, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Development and Regeneration, KU, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We developed a pharmacokinetic model of intravenous sildenafil in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) to achieve a target plasma concentration of over 50 μg/l. METHODS: Twenty-three CDH newborns with pulmonary hypertension (64 blood samples) received intravenous sildenafil. Patients received a loading dose of 0.35 mg/kg (IQR 0.16 mg/kg) for 3 h, followed by a continuous infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/day (IQR 0.1 mg/kg/day). For model development, non-linear mixed modeling was used. Inter-individual variability (IIV) and inter-occasion variability were tested. Demographic and laboratory parameters were evaluated as covariates. Normalized prediction distribution errors (NPDE) and visual predictive check (VPC) were used for model validation. RESULTS: A two-compartment disposition model of sildenafil and a one-compartment disposition model of desmethyl sildenafil (DMS) was observed with IIV in sildenafil and DMS clearance and volume of distribution of sildenafil. NPDE and VPC revealed adequate predictability. Only postnatal age increased sildenafil clearance. This was partly compensated by a higher DMS concentration, which also has a therapeutic effect. In this small group of patients, sildenafil was tolerated well. CONCLUSIONS: This model for sildenafil in CDH patients shows that concentration-targeted sildenafil dosing of 0.4 mg/kg in 3 h, followed by 1.6 mg/kg/day continuous infusion achieves appropriate sildenafil plasma levels.
PURPOSE: We developed a pharmacokinetic model of intravenous sildenafil in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) to achieve a target plasma concentration of over 50 μg/l. METHODS: Twenty-three CDH newborns with pulmonary hypertension (64 blood samples) received intravenous sildenafil. Patients received a loading dose of 0.35 mg/kg (IQR 0.16 mg/kg) for 3 h, followed by a continuous infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/day (IQR 0.1 mg/kg/day). For model development, non-linear mixed modeling was used. Inter-individual variability (IIV) and inter-occasion variability were tested. Demographic and laboratory parameters were evaluated as covariates. Normalized prediction distribution errors (NPDE) and visual predictive check (VPC) were used for model validation. RESULTS: A two-compartment disposition model of sildenafil and a one-compartment disposition model of desmethyl sildenafil (DMS) was observed with IIV in sildenafil and DMS clearance and volume of distribution of sildenafil. NPDE and VPC revealed adequate predictability. Only postnatal age increased sildenafil clearance. This was partly compensated by a higher DMS concentration, which also has a therapeutic effect. In this small group of patients, sildenafil was tolerated well. CONCLUSIONS: This model for sildenafil in CDHpatients shows that concentration-targeted sildenafil dosing of 0.4 mg/kg in 3 h, followed by 1.6 mg/kg/day continuous infusion achieves appropriate sildenafil plasma levels.
Authors: Florian Kipfmueller; Lukas Schroeder; Christoph Berg; Katrin Heindel; Peter Bartmann; Andreas Mueller Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2018-01-05
Authors: Gregory L Kearns; Susan M Abdel-Rahman; Sarah W Alander; Douglas L Blowey; J Steven Leeder; Ralph E Kauffman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-09-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kitty G Snoek; Irwin K M Reiss; Anne Greenough; Irma Capolupo; Berndt Urlesberger; Lucas Wessel; Laurent Storme; Jan Deprest; Thomas Schaible; Arno van Heijst; Dick Tibboel Journal: Neonatology Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Janneke M Brussee; Nienke J Vet; Elke H J Krekels; Abraham J Valkenburg; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain; Joop M A van Gerven; Eleonora L Swart; Johannes N van den Anker; Dick Tibboel; Matthijs de Hoog; Saskia N de Wildt; Catherijne A J Knibbe Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Suzan Cochius-den Otter; Jan A Deprest; Laurent Storme; Anne Greenough; Dick Tibboel Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 3.569