Hamed Joodaki1, Bronislaw Gepner2, Timothy McMurry3, Jason Kerrigan2. 1. Center for Applied Biomechanics, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, 4040 Lewis and Clark Dr, Charlottesvillle, VA, 22911, USA. hj2vq@virginia.edu. 2. Center for Applied Biomechanics, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, 4040 Lewis and Clark Dr, Charlottesvillle, VA, 22911, USA. 3. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, PO Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that occupants with obesity are at a greater risk of fatality and serious injury than other occupants in motor vehicle crashes. OBJECTIVE: To provide a more complete description of the most frequent injuries and the most frequently injured body regions for occupants with obesity. METHODS: Sampled cases (n = 13,470) representing ~4.7 million adult occupants involved in frontal crashes (between 2000 and 2015) were selected from the U.S. National Automotive Sampling System-Crashworthiness Data System database. A retrospective cohort study was performed to study the effect of BMI on the risk of injury to different body regions and to identify the most frequent injuries to occupants with different BMIs. Lastly, in-depth crash analysis cases from the U.S. Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) database were studied to elucidate the source of the most common injuries to occupants with obesity. RESULTS: Occupants with obesity experienced a higher risk of upper extremity (4.79 vs 2.92%), lower extremity (8.37 vs 3.23%), and spine (1.53 vs 1.09%) injuries than other occupants. After adjusting for other variables, the risks of spinal, thoracic, and extremities injuries were found to be affected by the BMI class. Seven out of the ten most common injuries sustained by occupants with obesity were lower extremity injuries, and talus fractures were the most common overall. Direct loading through the plantar surface of the foot by the vehicle toe pan was found to be a likely cause of many of those injuries based on CIREN cases. CONCLUSIONS: The injuries of occupants with obesity are different than other occupants which can be attributed to their different interaction with the seat belt and vehicle interior. The findings of this study should be considered for designing restraint systems to protect occupants with obesity in car crashes.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that occupants with obesity are at a greater risk of fatality and serious injury than other occupants in motor vehicle crashes. OBJECTIVE: To provide a more complete description of the most frequent injuries and the most frequently injured body regions for occupants with obesity. METHODS: Sampled cases (n = 13,470) representing ~4.7 million adult occupants involved in frontal crashes (between 2000 and 2015) were selected from the U.S. National Automotive Sampling System-Crashworthiness Data System database. A retrospective cohort study was performed to study the effect of BMI on the risk of injury to different body regions and to identify the most frequent injuries to occupants with different BMIs. Lastly, in-depth crash analysis cases from the U.S. Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) database were studied to elucidate the source of the most common injuries to occupants with obesity. RESULTS: Occupants with obesity experienced a higher risk of upper extremity (4.79 vs 2.92%), lower extremity (8.37 vs 3.23%), and spine (1.53 vs 1.09%) injuries than other occupants. After adjusting for other variables, the risks of spinal, thoracic, and extremities injuries were found to be affected by the BMI class. Seven out of the ten most common injuries sustained by occupants with obesity were lower extremity injuries, and talus fractures were the most common overall. Direct loading through the plantar surface of the foot by the vehicle toe pan was found to be a likely cause of many of those injuries based on CIREN cases. CONCLUSIONS: The injuries of occupants with obesity are different than other occupants which can be attributed to their different interaction with the seat belt and vehicle interior. The findings of this study should be considered for designing restraint systems to protect occupants with obesity in car crashes.
Authors: Dennis R Durbin; Jessica S Jermakian; Michael J Kallan; Anne T McCartt; Kristy B Arbogast; Mark R Zonfrillo; Rachel K Myers Journal: Accid Anal Prev Date: 2015-04-22
Authors: Jason L Forman; Francisco J Lopez-Valdes; Sonia Duprey; Dipan Bose; Eduardo Del Pozo de Dios; Damien Subit; Tim Gillispie; Jeff R Crandall; Maria Segui-Gomez Journal: Accid Anal Prev Date: 2015-04-02
Authors: Shankuan Zhu; Peter M Layde; Clare E Guse; Purushottam W Laud; Frank Pintar; Raminder Nirula; Stephen Hargarten Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-03-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jonathan D Rupp; Carol A C Flannagan; Andrew J Leslie; Carrie N Hoff; Matthew P Reed; Rebecca M Cunningham Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 5.002