Literature DB >> 31740504

Shared Genetic Control of Root System Architecture between Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor.

Zihao Zheng1,2, Stefan Hey1,3, Talukder Jubery4, Huyu Liu1,2,5, Yu Yang1,5, Lisa Coffey1, Chenyong Miao6, Brandi Sigmon7, James C Schnable8, Frank Hochholdinger3, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian4, Patrick S Schnable9,2,5.   

Abstract

Determining the genetic control of root system architecture (RSA) in plants via large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) requires high-throughput pipelines for root phenotyping. We developed Core Root Excavation using Compressed-air (CREAMD), a high-throughput pipeline for the cleaning of field-grown roots, and Core Root Feature Extraction (COFE), a semiautomated pipeline for the extraction of RSA traits from images. CREAMD-COFE was applied to diversity panels of maize (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), which consisted of 369 and 294 genotypes, respectively. Six RSA-traits were extracted from images collected from >3,300 maize roots and >1,470 sorghum roots. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based GWAS identified 87 TAS (trait-associated SNPs) in maize, representing 77 genes and 115 TAS in sorghum. An additional 62 RSA-associated maize genes were identified via expression read depth GWAS. Among the 139 maize RSA-associated genes (or their homologs), 22 (16%) are known to affect RSA in maize or other species. In addition, 26 RSA-associated genes are coregulated with genes previously shown to affect RSA and 51 (37% of RSA-associated genes) are themselves transe-quantitative trait locus for another RSA-associated gene. Finally, the finding that RSA-associated genes from maize and sorghum included seven pairs of syntenic genes demonstrates the conservation of regulation of morphology across taxa.
© 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31740504      PMCID: PMC6997706          DOI: 10.1104/pp.19.00752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  84 in total

1.  Distribution of allele frequencies and effect sizes and their interrelationships for common genetic susceptibility variants.

Authors:  Ju-Hyun Park; Mitchell H Gail; Clarice R Weinberg; Raymond J Carroll; Charles C Chung; Zhaoming Wang; Stephen J Chanock; Joseph F Fraumeni; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  QTL analysis of root traits as related to phosphorus efficiency in soybean.

Authors:  Quan Liang; Xiaohui Cheng; Mantong Mei; Xiaolong Yan; Hong Liao
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Analysis of the root-hair morphogenesis transcriptome reveals the molecular identity of six genes with roles in root-hair development in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Mark A Jones; Marjorie J Raymond; Nicholas Smirnoff
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 4.  Pampered inside, pestered outside? Differences and similarities between plants growing in controlled conditions and in the field.

Authors:  Hendrik Poorter; Fabio Fiorani; Roland Pieruschka; Tobias Wojciechowski; Wim H van der Putten; Michael Kleyer; Uli Schurr; Johannes Postma
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Isolation, characterization, and pericycle-specific transcriptome analyses of the novel maize lateral and seminal root initiation mutant rum1.

Authors:  Katrin Woll; Lisa A Borsuk; Harald Stransky; Dan Nettleton; Patrick S Schnable; Frank Hochholdinger
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Roothairless5, which functions in maize (Zea mays L.) root hair initiation and elongation encodes a monocot-specific NADPH oxidase.

Authors:  Josefine Nestler; Sanzhen Liu; Tsui-Jung Wen; Anja Paschold; Caroline Marcon; Ho Man Tang; Delin Li; Li Li; Robert B Meeley; Hajime Sakai; Wesley Bruce; Patrick S Schnable; Frank Hochholdinger
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  Mapping QTLs for root system architecture of maize (Zea mays L.) in the field at different developmental stages.

Authors:  Hongguang Cai; Fanjun Chen; Guohua Mi; Fusuo Zhang; Hans Peter Maurer; Wenxin Liu; Jochen C Reif; Lixing Yuan
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Stability of Single-Parent Gene Expression Complementation in Maize Hybrids upon Water Deficit Stress.

Authors:  Caroline Marcon; Anja Paschold; Waqas Ahmed Malik; Andrew Lithio; Jutta A Baldauf; Lena Altrogge; Nina Opitz; Christa Lanz; Heiko Schoof; Dan Nettleton; Hans-Peter Piepho; Frank Hochholdinger
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 9.  Revealing the architecture of gene regulation: the promise of eQTL studies.

Authors:  Yoav Gilad; Scott A Rifkin; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Substantial contribution of genetic variation in the expression of transcription factors to phenotypic variation revealed by eRD-GWAS.

Authors:  Hung-Ying Lin; Qiang Liu; Xiao Li; Jinliang Yang; Sanzhen Liu; Yinlian Huang; Michael J Scanlon; Dan Nettleton; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Advanced high-throughput plant phenotyping techniques for genome-wide association studies: A review.

Authors:  Qinlin Xiao; Xiulin Bai; Chu Zhang; Yong He
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 10.479

2.  Root Pulling Force Across Drought in Maize Reveals Genotype by Environment Interactions and Candidate Genes.

Authors:  Patrick Woods; Kevin R Lehner; Kirsten Hein; Jack L Mullen; John K McKay
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  DIRT/3D: 3D root phenotyping for field-grown maize (Zea mays).

Authors:  Suxing Liu; Carlos Sherard Barrow; Meredith Hanlon; Jonathan P Lynch; Alexander Bucksch
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Dissecting the Root Phenotypic and Genotypic Variability of the Iowa Mung Bean Diversity Panel.

Authors:  Kevin O Chiteri; Talukder Zaki Jubery; Somak Dutta; Baskar Ganapathysubramanian; Steven Cannon; Arti Singh
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Association mapping across a multitude of traits collected in diverse environments in maize.

Authors:  Ravi V Mural; Guangchao Sun; Marcin Grzybowski; Michael C Tross; Hongyu Jin; Christine Smith; Linsey Newton; Carson M Andorf; Margaret R Woodhouse; Addie M Thompson; Brandi Sigmon; James C Schnable
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 7.658

Review 6.  Hyperspectral reflectance-based phenotyping for quantitative genetics in crops: Progress and challenges.

Authors:  Marcin Grzybowski; Nuwan K Wijewardane; Abbas Atefi; Yufeng Ge; James C Schnable
Journal:  Plant Commun       Date:  2021-05-27

7.  TWAS results are complementary to and less affected by linkage disequilibrium than GWAS.

Authors:  Delin Li; Qiang Liu; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Meta-analysis identifies pleiotropic loci controlling phenotypic trade-offs in sorghum.

Authors:  Ravi V Mural; Marcin Grzybowski; Chenyong Miao; Alyssa Damke; Sirjan Sapkota; Richard E Boyles; Maria G Salas Fernandez; Patrick S Schnable; Brandi Sigmon; Stephen Kresovich; James C Schnable
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Root angle in maize influences nitrogen capture and is regulated by calcineurin B-like protein (CBL)-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 15 (ZmCIPK15).

Authors:  Hannah M Schneider; Vai Sa Nee Lor; Meredith T Hanlon; Alden Perkins; Shawn M Kaeppler; Aditi N Borkar; Rahul Bhosale; Xia Zhang; Jonas Rodriguez; Alexander Bucksch; Malcolm J Bennett; Kathleen M Brown; Jonathan P Lynch
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 7.947

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.