Literature DB >> 31740225

Birthweight of IVF children is still a current issue and still related to maternal factors.

Any Beltran Anzola1, Vanessa Pauly2, Olivier Riviere3, Roland Sambuc4, Pierre Boyer5, Françoise Vendittelli6, Marie-José Gervoise-Boyer7.   

Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does fresh embryo transfer after IVF with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) increase the small for gestational age (SGA) rate, and frozen embryo transfer (FET) after IVF with or without ICSI increase the large for gestational age (LGA) rate versus natural conception?
DESIGN: Retrospective comparison of an exposed historical group/cohort involving singletons conceived after fresh embryo transfer and after FET with an unexposed group/cohort involving singletons conceived after a natural conception.
RESULTS: A total of 1961 fresh embryo transfer babies and 366 FET babies were compared with 6981 natural conception babies. The SGA rate in fresh embryo transfer babies was not significantly different to natural conception babies (6.9% versus 6.8%, P = 0.856). This outcome was not influenced by the fresh embryo transfer (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8-1.3), but rather by a low rate of multiparity (aOR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.7), advanced maternal age (aOR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.2), maternal underweight (aOR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.1), maternal smoking or cessation during pregnancy (aOR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4-2.3), pre-existing hypertension (aOR 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.1) and pregnancy-induced hypertension (aOR 2.5; 95% CI 1.7-3.7). The LGA rate in FET babies was significantly different from natural conception babies (6.6% versus 3.2%, P = 0.012). This outcome was influenced by the transfer of frozen embryos (aOR 2.2; 95% CI 1.3-3.8) and by a high maternal weight (aOR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Maternal background and obstetric parameters are more likely to influence the SGA rate than fresh embryo transfer conception. FET conception could be associated with an increase in LGA rate.
Copyright © 2019 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technologies; Birthweight; Large for gestational age; Singleton child; Small for gestational age

Year:  2019        PMID: 31740225     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  3 in total

1.  Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nakeisha A Lodge-Tulloch; Flavia T S Elias; Jessica Pudwell; Laura Gaudet; Mark Walker; Graeme N Smith; Maria P Velez
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Association of parental prepregnancy BMI with neonatal outcomes and birth defect in fresh embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ruixue Chen; Lifen Chen; Yifeng Liu; Feixia Wang; Siwen Wang; Yun Huang; Kai-Lun Hu; Yuzhi Fan; Ruoyan Liu; Runjv Zhang; Dan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Which is better for mothers and babies: fresh or frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer?

Authors:  Meiling Yang; Li Lin; Chunli Sha; Taoqiong Li; Wujiang Gao; Lu Chen; Ying Wu; Yanping Ma; Xiaolan Zhu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.