Literature DB >> 31740014

Validation of a custom spine biomechanics simulator: A case for standardization.

John T Sherrill1, Safeer F Siddicky1, Wyatt D Davis1, Caroline Chen1, David B Bumpass1, Erin M Mannen2.   

Abstract

Mechanical testing machines used in cadaveric spine biomechanics research vary between labs. It is a necessary first step to understand the capabilities and limitations in any testing machine prior to publishing experimental data. In this study, a reproducible protocol that uses a synthetic spine was developed and used to quantify the inherent rotation error and the ability to apply loads in a single physiologic plane (pure-moment) of a custom spine biomechanics simulator. Rotation error was evaluated by comparing data collected by the test machine and the data collected by an optical motion capture system. Pure-moment loading was assessed by comparing the out-of-plane loads to the primary plane load. Using synthetic functional spine units previously shown to have mechanics similar to the cadaveric human spine, the simulator was evaluated using a dynamic test protocol reflective of its future use in the study of cadaveric spine specimens. Rotation errors inherent in the test machine were <0.25° compared to motion capture. Out of plane loads were <4.0% of the primary plane load, which confirmed pure-moment loading. The authors suggest that a standard validation protocol for biomechanical spine testing machines is needed for transparency and accurate field-wide data interpretation and comparison. We offer recommendations based on the reproducible use of a synthetic spinal specimen for consideration.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pure moment; Spine biomechanics; Synthetic; Test machine; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31740014      PMCID: PMC6952059          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  1 in total

1.  Mechanical Analysis of 3 Posterior Fusion Assemblies Intended to Cross the Cervicothoracic Junction.

Authors:  John T Sherrill; David B Bumpass; Erin M Mannen
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 1.723

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.