| Literature DB >> 31739429 |
Shao-Jen Weng1,2, Ming-Che Tsai3,4, Yao-Te Tsai5, Donald F Gotcher6, Chih-Hao Chen1, Shih-Chia Liu1, Yeong-Yuh Xu7, Seung-Hwan Kim8.
Abstract
Emergency department crowding has been one of the main issues in the health system in Taiwan. Previous studies have usually targeted the process improvement of patient treatment flow due to the difficulty of collecting Emergency Department (ED) staff data. In this study, we have proposed a hybrid model with Discrete Event Simulation, radio frequency identification applications, and activity-relationship diagrams to simulate the nurse movement flows and identify the relationship between different treatment sections. We used the results to formulate four facility layouts. Through comparing four scenarios, the simulation results indicated that 2.2 km of traveling distance or 140 min of traveling time reduction per nurse could be achieved from the best scenario.Entities:
Keywords: activity-relationship diagram; facility layout design; hospital operations; radio frequency identification; simulation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31739429 PMCID: PMC6888262 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16224478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Research Framework.
Figure 2Emergency Department patient treatment flow.
Simulation model inputs with real data.
| Model Inputs | Value in Minutes [Lower 95% CL, Mean, Upper 95% CL] |
|---|---|
| Triage processing time | (5.23, 5.27, 5.31) |
| Triage (first aid patient) processing time | (30.55, 30.86, 31.16) |
| First aid processing time | (10.23, 10.59, 10.96) |
| Treatment processing time | (7.02, 7.26, 7.50) |
| Observation time | (389.34, 398.03, 406.71) |
| Observation time(Pediatric) | (255.72, 269.55, 283.39) |
Simulation model inputs with assumptions.
| Model Inputs | Distributional Assumptions in Minutes * |
|---|---|
| Blood test processing time | Triangular (13, 14, 15) |
| X-ray processing time | Triangular (5, 6, 7) |
| MRI processing time | Triangular (30, 32, 35) |
| Other tests processing time | Triangular (10, 15, 20) |
* The setting of distributional assumptions are suggested by the nurses.
Figure 3Radio frequency identification applications installed locations.
Figure 4Activity-Relationship diagram.
Validation Results.
| Critical Indicators | μ of Actuality 1 | μ of Simulation Model 2 | σ of Simulation Model 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ED patient’s length of stay greater than 24 h | 1.58% | 1.70% | 1.64% | 1.4524 | 0.1464 |
| ED patient’s length of stay greater than 48 h | 0.47% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.3253 | 0.7450 |
| ED patient’s length of stay greater than 72 h | 0.18% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.1718 | 0.8636 |
1 μ of Actuality indicates the average rate of the indicator gathered from the historical data. 2 μ of Simulation model indicates the average rate of the indicator obtained from the simulation model. 3 σ of Simulation model represents the standard deviation of the indicator in the simulation model.
Figure 5Layout Design A.
Figure 6Layout Design B.
Figure 7Layout Design C.
Figure 8Layout Design D.
Simulation results of the patients.
| Item | Average Travel Distance of Patient (meter) | Average Travel Time of Patient (min) | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base | 69.72 | 0.93 | |
| Design A | 90.02 | 1.20 | −29% |
| Design B | 89.63 | 1.20 | −29% |
| Design C | 83.17 | 1.11 | −19% |
| Design D | 73.62 | 0.98 | −6% |
Simulation results of the nurses.
| Item | Average Travel Distance of Nurse (meter) | Average Travel Time of Nurse (min) | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base | 2295.40 | 30.61 | |
| Design A | 2674.31 | 35.66 | −17% |
| Design B | 2391.26 | 31.88 | −4% |
| Design C | 2692.08 | 35.89 | −17% |
| Design D | 2206.43 | 29.42 | 4% |