Literature DB >> 31738366

Neurohormonal Blockade and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure Supported by Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Megan McCullough1, Cesar Caraballo2, Neal G Ravindra3,4,5, P Elliott Miller5,6, Catherine Mezzacappa1, Andrew Levin1, Jadry Gruen1, Benjamin Rodwin1,7, Samuel Reinhardt5, David van Dijk3,4,5, Ayyaz Ali8, Tariq Ahmad2,5, Nihar R Desai2,5.   

Abstract

Importance: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure, but little is known about the role of neurohormonal blockade (NHB) in treating these patients. Objective: To analyze the association between NHB blockade and outcomes in patients with LVADs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort analysis of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) included patients from more than 170 centers across the United States and Canada with continuous flow LVADs from 2008 to 2016 who were alive with the device in place at 6 months after implant. The data were analyzed between February and November 2019. Exposures: Patients were stratified based on exposure to NHB and represented all permutations of the following drug classes: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, β-blockers, and mineralocorticoid antagonists. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcomes of interest were survival at 4 years and quality of life at 2 years based on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores and a 6-minute walk test.
Results: A total of 12 144 patients in INTERMACS met inclusion criteria, of whom 2526 (20.8% ) were women, 8088 (66.6%) were white, 3024 (24.9%) were African American, and 753 (6.2%) were Hispanic; the mean (SD) age was 56.8 (12.9) years. Of these, 10 419 (85.8%) were receiving NHB. Those receiving any NHB medication at 6 months had a better survival rate at 4 years compared with patients not receiving NHB (56.0%; 95% CI, 54.5%-57.5% vs 43.9%; 95% CI, 40.5%-47.7%). After sensitivity analyses with an adjusted model, this trend persisted with patients receiving triple therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, β-blocker, and mineralocorticoid antagonist having the lowest hazard of death compared with patients in the other groups (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.28-0.41). Compared with patients not receiving NHB, use of NHB was associated with a higher Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score (66.6; bootstrapped 95% CI, 65.8-67.3 vs 63.0; bootstrapped 95% CI, 60.1-65.8; P = .02) and a 6-minute walk test (1103 ft; bootstrapped 95% CI, 1084-1123 ft vs 987 ft; bootstrapped 95% CI, 913-1060 ft; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with LVADs who tolerated NHB therapy, continued treatment was associated with improved survival and quality of life. The optimal heart failure regimen for patients after LVAD implant may be the initiation and continuation of guideline-directed medical therapy.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31738366      PMCID: PMC6865330          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  13 in total

1.  Impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition on morbidity and mortality during long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support: An IMACS report.

Authors:  D Marshall Brinkley; Li Wang; Chang Yu; E Wilson Grandin; Michael S Kiernan
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  Foreword.

Authors: 
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-06-29

Review 3.  LVAD as a Bridge to Remission from Advanced Heart Failure: Current Data and Opportunities for Improvement.

Authors:  Christos P Kyriakopoulos; Chris J Kapelios; Elizabeth L Stauder; Iosif Taleb; Rana Hamouche; Konstantinos Sideris; Antigone G Koliopoulou; Michael J Bonios; Stavros G Drakos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Neurohormonal blockade in patients with LVADs.

Authors:  Karina Huynh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Framework to Classify Reverse Cardiac Remodeling With Mechanical Circulatory Support: The Utah-Inova Stages.

Authors:  Palak Shah; Mitchell Psotka; Iosif Taleb; Rami Alharethi; Mortada A Shams; Omar Wever-Pinzon; Michael Yin; Federica Latta; Josef Stehlik; James C Fang; Guoqing Diao; Ramesh Singh; Naila Ijaz; Christos P Kyriakopoulos; Wei Zhu; Christopher W May; Lauren B Cooper; Shashank S Desai; Craig H Selzman; Abdallah G Kfoury; Stavros G Drakos
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 8.790

6.  Outcomes With Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor Use After Left Ventricular Assist Device: An STS-INTERMACS Analysis.

Authors:  E Wilson Grandin; Gaurav Gulati; Jose I Nunez; Kevin Kennedy; J Eduardo Rame; Pavan Atluri; Francis D Pagani; James K Kirklin; Robert L Kormos; Jeffrey Teuteberg; Michael S Kiernan
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 10.447

Review 7.  Implication of Hemodynamic Assessment during Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Nikhil Narang
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  Characteristics and outcome of ambulatory heart failure patients receiving a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Guillaume Baudry; Nicolas Nesseler; Erwan Flecher; André Vincentelli; Céline Goeminne; Clément Delmas; Jean Porterie; Karine Nubret; Mathieu Pernot; Michel Kindo; Tam Hoang Minh; Philippe Rouvière; Philippe Gaudard; Magali Michel; Thomas Senage; Aude Boignard; Olivier Chavanon; Marylou Para; Constance Verdonk; Edeline Pelcé; Vlad Gariboldi; Frederic Anselme; Pierre-Yves Litzler; Katrien Blanchart; Gerard Babatasi; Marie Bielefeld; Olivier Bouchot; David Hamon; Nicolas Lellouche; Xavier Bailleul; Thibaud Genet; Romain Eschalier; Nicolas d'Ostrevy; Marie-Cécile Bories; Ramzi Abi Akar; Hugues Blangy; Fabrice Vanhuyse; Jean François Obadia; Vincent Galand; Matteo Pozzi
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-09-07

9.  The role of Asprosin in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ming-Shien Wen; Chao-Yung Wang; Jih-Kai Yeh; Chun-Chi Chen; Ming-Lung Tsai; Ming-Yun Ho; Kuo-Chun Hung; I-Chang Hsieh
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Outcomes in patients with anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy undergoing left ventricular assist devices implantation.

Authors:  Avirup Guha; Cesar Caraballo; Prantesh Jain; P Elliott Miller; Jocelyn Owusu-Guha; Katherine A A Clark; Eric J Velazquez; Tariq Ahmad; Lauren A Baldassarre; Daniel Addison; Neal L Weintraub; Nihar R Desai
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.