Literature DB >> 31738104

Trophic Position of Consumers and Size Structure of Food Webs across Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems.

Anton M Potapov, Ulrich Brose, Stefan Scheu, Alexei V Tiunov.   

Abstract

Do large organisms occupy higher trophic levels? Predators are often larger than their prey in food chains, but empirical evidence for positive body mass-trophic level scaling for entire food webs mostly comes from marine communities on the basis of unicellular producers. Using published data on stable isotope compositions of 1,093 consumer species, we explored how trophic level scales with body size, food web type (green vs. brown), and phylogenetic group across biomes. In contrast to widespread assumptions, the relationship between body size and trophic level of consumers-from protists to large vertebrates-was not significant per se but varied among ecosystem types and animal groups. The correlation between body size and trophic level was strong in marine consumers, weak in freshwater consumers, and absent in terrestrial consumers, which was also observed at the scale of local food webs. Vertebrates occupied higher trophic positions than invertebrates, and green trophic chains were longer than brown ones in aquatic (primarily marine) but not in terrestrial food webs. Variations in body size of top predators suggest that terrestrial and many freshwater food webs are size compartmentalized, implying different trophic dynamics and responses to perturbations than in size-structured marine food webs.

Keywords:  allometric scaling; body mass; size compartmentalization; stable isotopes; trophic chain; trophic level

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31738104     DOI: 10.1086/705811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  3 in total

1.  On the evolution of trophic position.

Authors:  Marvin Moosmann; Maria Cuenca-Cambronero; Stephen De Lisle; Ryan Greenway; Cameron M Hudson; Moritz D Lürig; Blake Matthews
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 11.274

2.  Quantitative mismatch between empirical temperature-size rule slopes and predictions based on oxygen limitation.

Authors:  Sigurd Einum; Claus Bech; Øystein Nordeide Kielland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Inferences to estimate consumer's diet using stable isotopes: Insights from a dynamic mixing model.

Authors:  Marine Ballutaud; Morgane Travers-Trolet; Paul Marchal; Stanislas F Dubois; Carolina Giraldo; Andrew C Parnell; M Teresa Nuche-Pascual; Sébastien Lefebvre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.