| Literature DB >> 31737272 |
Cassandra A Parker1, Fritz Geiser1, Clare Stawski1,2.
Abstract
In a changing climate, southern hemisphere mammals are predicted to face rising temperatures and aridity, resulting in food and water shortages, which may further challenge already constrained energetic demands. Especially semelparous mammals may be threatened because survival of the entire population depends on the success of a single breeding event. One of these species, the yellow-footed antechinus, Antechinus flavipes, a small, heterothermic marsupial mammal, commences reproduction during winter, when insect prey is limited and energetic constraints are high. We examined the inter-relations between thermal and foraging biology of free-ranging A. flavipes and examined whether they use torpor for energy conservation, despite the fact that reproduction and torpor are considered to be incompatible for many mammals. Females used torpor during the reproductive season, but patterns changed with reproductive status. Prior to breeding, females used frequent (86% of days), deep and long torpor that was more pronounced than any other reproductive group, including pre-mating males (64% of days). Pregnant females continued to use torpor, albeit torpor was less frequent (28% of days) and significantly shorter and shallower than before breeding. Parturient and lactating females did not express torpor. During the mating period, males reduced torpor use (24% of days). Pre-reproductive females and pre-mating males were the least active and may use torpor to minimize predator exposure and enhance fat deposition in anticipation of the energetic demands associated with impending mating, gestation and lactation. Reproductive females were most active and likely foraged and fed to promote growth and development of young. Our data show that A. flavipes are balancing energetic demands during the reproductive season by modifying torpor and activity patterns. As the timing of reproduction is fixed for this genus, it is probable that climate change will render these behavioural and physiological adaptations as inadequate and threaten this and other semelparous species.Entities:
Keywords: body temperature; lactation; mammal; pregnancy; torpor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31737272 PMCID: PMC6846706 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coz073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conserv Physiol ISSN: 2051-1434 Impact factor: 3.079
Figure 1(A) Body temperature (Tb; dots) fluctuations of a female Antechinus flavipes and ambient temperature (Ta; line) throughout the study period. Also shown are the approximate breeding period, the date of conception and parturition/early lactation. (B) Tb fluctuations of a male A. flavipes throughout the study period including Ta. The approximate breeding period is also shown.
Figure 2(A) Mean proportion of days that torpor was used (percent) by individuals and (B) mean TDT (min) is compared in individuals of varying reproductive condition. Parturient and lactating females were excluded from TDT analysis because they did not use any torpor. Significantly different groups are marked with different letters (post hoc Tukey test)
Figure 3The relationship between daily minimum body temperature (Tb min) and daily minimum ambient temperature (Ta min) among reproductive groups. The relationship was significant in pre-mating males (t4,171 = 5.21, P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.26, y = 0.32x + 28.97), mating males (t1,40 = 3.19, P = 0.003, R2 = 0.26, y = 0.59x + 29.89), pre-reproductive females (t7,390 = 10.27, P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.22, y = 0.71x + 22.46) and pregnant females (t3,112 = 3.78, P = 0.003, R2 = 0.11, y = 0.53x + 28.84). Ta min had no obvious effect on Tb min in parturient females (t2,12 = 0.62, P = 0.546) or lactating females (t1,49 = 0.70, P = 0.486).
Summary of body temperature (Tb) data from Antechinus flavipes. If means differed significantly between the groups, they are identified by different letters
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Absolute | 22.4 | 23.8 | 16.6 | 18.7 | 35.3 | 32.2 |
| Absolute | 41.0 | 40.5 | 41.5 | 40.0 | 39.8 | 39.4 |
| Mean | 34.6 ± 0.5a | 35.7 ± 0.7b | 31.9 ± 0.4c | 35.3 ± 0.5a | 37.1 ± 0.5b | 36.5 ± 0.8b |
| Mean | 29.7 ± 1.2a | 31.3 ± 0.7b | 24.6 ± 0.6c | 31.3 ± 0.5b | 36.2 ± 0.3d | 35.3 ± 0.8d |
| Mean | 39.1 ± 0.4a | 39.3 ± 0.2a,b | 38.6 ± 0.6a,b,c | 38.5 ± 0.7a,c,d | 37.9 ± 0.5d | 38.3 ± 0.4a,c,d |
| Mean | 9.4 ± 1.3a | 7.7 ± 0.8b | 14.0 ± 1.1c | 7.8 ± 1.0b | 1.8 ± 0.5d | 3.0 ± 0.3d |
Figure 4Daily mean activity duration (TAD; minutes per day) is compared among reproductive groups. Significantly different groups are marked with different letters (post hoc Tukey test).