| Literature DB >> 31737014 |
Tao Xu1,2, Yao Chen1, Hunseung Kang3.
Abstract
Melatonin is a ubiquitous molecule distributed in nature and not only plays an important role in animals and humans but also has extensive functions in plants, such as delaying senescence, exerting antioxidant effects, regulating growth and development, and facilitating plant adaption to stress conditions. Endogenous melatonin is widespread in fruits and vegetables and plays prominent roles in the ripening and post-harvest process of fruits and vegetables. Exogenous application of melatonin removes excess reactive oxygen species from post-harvest fruits and vegetables by increasing antioxidant enzymes, non-enzymatic antioxidants, and enzymes related to oxidized protein repair. Moreover, exogenous application of melatonin can increase endogenous melatonin to augment its effects on various physiological processes. Many previous reports have demonstrated that application of exogenous melatonin improves the post-harvest preservation of fruits and vegetables. Although overproduction of melatonin in plants via transgenic approaches could be a potential means for improving the post-harvest preservation of fruits and vegetables, efforts to increase endogenous melatonin in plants are limited. In this review, we summarize the recent progress revealing the role and action mechanisms of melatonin in post-harvest fruits and vegetables and provide future directions for the utilization of melatonin to improve the post-harvest preservation of fruits and vegetables.Entities:
Keywords: fruits; melatonin; post-harvest preservation; ripening; vegetables
Year: 2019 PMID: 31737014 PMCID: PMC6831725 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01388
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Contents of endogenous melatonin in different post-harvest fruits.
| Common name | Scientific name | Analytical method | Harvesting place/time/plant developmental stage | Melatonin content (ng/g) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple | HPLC-FD | – | 0.04 FW | ||
| GC-MS | Egypt | 0.16 FW | |||
| Not specified | GC/MS | – | 0.05 WW | ||
| Banana | GC-MS | Germany; Spring and Summer 1993 | 0.47 FW | ||
| GC-MS | Egypt | 0.66 FW | |||
| Black olive | Not specified | LC-MS/MS | Turkey | 0.01 DW | |
| Cherry | HPLC-ECD | United States; 17 July; United States; 26 July; United States; 7 August | 1.07 ± 0.35 FW; 2.18 ± 0.26 FW; 2.03 ± 0.29 FW | ||
| HPLC-ECD | United States; 17 July; United States; 26 July; United States; 7 August | 13.51 ± 1.11 FW; 15.43 ± 1.75 FW; 13.96 ± 1.31 FW | |||
| HPLC-EMS | The Cherry Marketing Institute | 12.3 ± 2 DW | |||
| HPLC-EMS | The Cherry Marketing Institute | 2.9 ± 0.6 DW | |||
| HPLC-MS | Spain; around mid-May | 0.22 FW | |||
| HPLC-MS | Spain; 6 days after Burlat | 0.03 FW | |||
| HPLC-MS | Spain; 18 days after Burlat | 0.01 FW | |||
| HPLC-MS | Spain; 31 days after Burlat | 0.01 FW | |||
| HPLC-MS | Spain; 33 days after Burlat | 0.06 FW | |||
| HPLC-MS | Spain; 37 days after Burlat | 0.12 FW | |||
| HPLC-MS | Spain; 44 days after Burlat | 0.05 FW | |||
| SPE HPLC | IFP/BAAFS; 10-year-old Hongdeng, 12-year-old Rainier trees | 10 – 20 FW | |||
| Cranberry | UPLC-MS | Haida Gwaii; September 2010 | 40,000 DW | ||
| UPLC-MS | Haida Gwaii; September 2010 | 25,000 DW | |||
| UPLC-MS | Haida Gwaii; September 2010 | 96,000 DW | |||
| Grape | HPLC-ELISA | Italy | 0.97 | ||
| HPLC-ELISA | Italy | 0.87 | |||
| HPLC-ELISA | Italy | 0.63 | |||
| HPLC-ELISA | Italy | 0.42 | |||
| HPLC-ELISA | Italy | 0.01 | |||
| HPLC-ELISA | Italy | 0.03 | |||
| HPLC-ELISA | Italy | 0.33 | |||
| HPLC-ELISA | Italy | 0.26 | |||
| CEC | Argentina; April 2009 | 0.6 – 1.2 | |||
| UPLC-(ToF)MS | British, 21–30 August 2008 | 100,000 – 150,000 FW | |||
| HPLC-ESI-MS/MS | Gualtallary; 11-year-old plants | 8.9 – 158.9 | |||
| UPLC-MS/MS | Conegliano; 2009 | 3.9 – 9.3 | |||
| MEPS-HPLC-F | Italy | 1.5 FW | |||
| MEPS-HPLC-F | Italy | 1.2 FW | |||
| Kiwi | HPLC-FD | – | 0.02 FW | ||
| Mulberry | HPLC-ESI-MS/MS | China; 15, 21 and 28 April; 5, 12, 20, and 25 May | 0.58 – 1.41 FW | ||
| Pineapple | HPLC-FD | – | 0.04 FW | ||
| GC-MS | Egypt | 0.28 FW | |||
| Not specified | GC/MS | – | 0.04 WW | ||
| Pomegranate | GC-MS | Egypt | 0.17 FW | ||
| Strawberry | HPLC-FD | – | 0.01 FW | ||
| GC-MS | Egypt | 0.14 FW | |||
| LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; March 2009 and April 2010 | 5.58 ± 0.01 FW | |||
| LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; March 2009 and April 2010 | 5.5 ± 0.6 FW | |||
| LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; March 2009 and April 2010 | 11.26 ± 0.13 FW | |||
| LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; March 2009 and April 2010 | 8.5 ± 0.6FW | |||
| Not specified | GC/MS | – | 0.01 WW |
FW, fresh weight; DW, dry weight; WW, wet weight.
Contents of endogenous melatonin in different post-harvest vegetables.
| Common name | Scientific name | Tissue | Analytical method | Harvesting place/time/plant developmental stage | Melatonin content (ng/g) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anise | Seeds | HPLC/MS | – | 7 DW | ||
| Asparagus | Stems | HPLC-FD | – | 0.01 FW | ||
| Stems | RIA | – | 9.5 FW | |||
| Basidiomycota | Pileus | HPLC | Poland; Autumn 2008 | <10 DW | ||
| Pileus | HPLC | Poland; Autumn 2008 | <10 DW | |||
| Pileus | HPLC | Poland; Autumn 2008 | 6,800 ± 60 DW | |||
| Pileus | HPLC | Poland; Autumn 2008 | 1,400 ± 110 DW | |||
| Pileus | HPLC | Poland; Autumn 2008 | 12,900 ± 770 DW | |||
| Pileus | HPLC | Poland; Autumn 2008 | <10 DW | |||
| Pileus | RP-HPLC | – | 4,300 – 6,400 DW | |||
| Beetroot | Roots | GC/MS | Germany | 0.002 | ||
| Black mustard | Seeds | HPLC/MS | – | 129 DW | ||
| Cabbage | Leaves | HPLC-FD | – | 0.11 FW | ||
| Leaves | GC-MS | Egypt | 0.31 FW | |||
| Chinese cabbage | Leaves | HPLC-FD | – | 0.11 FW | ||
| Cardamom | Seeds | HPLC/MS | – | 15 DW | ||
| Carrot | Roots | GC-MS | Egypt | 0.50 FW | ||
| Roots | HPLC-FD | – | 0.06 FW | |||
| Not specified | Roots | GC/MS | – | 0.06 WW | ||
| Cauliflower | Flowers | GC-MS | Egypt | 0.82 FW | ||
| Celery | Seeds | HPLC/MS | – | 7 DW | ||
| Coriander | Seeds | HPLC/MS | – | 7DW | ||
| Cucumber | Fruits | GC-MS | Egypt | 0.59 FW | ||
| Fruits | HPLC-FD | – | 0.03 FW | |||
| Fruits | GC-MS | Germany | 0.10 FW | |||
| Not specified | Fruits | GC/MS | – | 0.03 WW | ||
| Date palm | Fruits | HPLC | Spain | 0.01 – 0.17FW | ||
| Fennel | Seeds | HPLC/MS | – | 28 DW | ||
| Fenugreek | Seeds | HPLC/MS | – | 43 DW | ||
| Garlic | Bulbs | GC-MS | Egypt | 0.59 FW | ||
| Ginger | Roots | HPLC-FD | – | 0.58 FW | ||
| Roots | GC-MS | Egypt | 1.42 FW | |||
| Kidney bean | Cotyledon | ELISA | Spain | 529.1 ± 27.5 DW | ||
| Cotyledon | HPLC-MS/MS | Spain | 529 DW | |||
| Lentil | Seeds | HPLC-MS/MS | Spain | 1,089.8 DW | ||
| Not specified | Seeds | RIA | – | 0.92 ± 0.06 DW | ||
| Milk thistle | Seeds | HPLC/MS | – | 2 DW | ||
| Onion | Bulbs | HPLC-FD | – | 0.09 FW | ||
| Bulbs | HPLC-FD | – | 0.03 FW | |||
| Bulbs | GC-MS | Egypt | 0.30 FW | |||
| Not specified | Bulbs | GC/MS | – | 0.03 WW | ||
| Pepper | Fruits | HPLC–FD | Turkey; 6 DAF Turkey; 30 DAF Turkey; red mature stage | 31.7 – 42.1 FW 9.1 FW 20.1 FW | ||
| Fruits | HPLC–FD | Turkey; 6 DAF Turkey; 26 DAF Turkey; red mature stage | 31.2 FW 7.3 FW 19.8 FW | |||
| Fruits | UHPLC-MS/MS | Spain | 4.48 FW, 31.01 DW | |||
| Fruits | UHPLC-MS/MS | Spain | 7.72 FW | |||
| Fruits | UHPLC-MS/MS | Spain | 11.9 FW, 93.4 DW | |||
| Fruits | UHPLC-MS/MS | Spain | 6.23 FW | |||
| Purslane | Leaves | GC/MS | – | 19 WW | ||
| Radish | Fruits | HPLC-FD | – | 0.66 FW | ||
| Roots | HPLC/MS | – | 0.6 – 485 | |||
| Fruits | GC-MS | Egypt | 0.76 FW | |||
| Spinach | Leaves | HPLC-FD | – | 0.04 FW | ||
| Not specified | Leaves | GC/MS | – | 0.04 WW | ||
| Soya bean | Seeds | RIA | – | 1.89 ± 0.11 DW | ||
| Taro | Corm | HPLC-FD | – | 0.06 FW | ||
| Tomato | Fruits | GC-MS | Germany | 0.11 | ||
| Fruits | GC/MS | Germany | 0.51 | |||
| Fruits | GC/MS | Germany | 0.17 | |||
| Fruits | EIA | – | 1.5 – 66.6 FW | |||
| Fruits | HPLC | About 34 DAF | 6.58 FW | |||
| Fruits | HPLC | About 34 DAF | 7.39 – 10.34 FW | |||
| Fruits | RIA | – | 0.03 | |||
| Fruits | HPLC-FD | – | 0.03 FW | |||
| Fruits | LC-MS | Egypt | 0.302 FW | |||
| Fruits | LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; January 2009 | 8.2 ± 0.6 FW | |||
| Fruits | LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; January 2009 | 23.87 ± 2.02 FW | |||
| Fruits | LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; January 2009 | 4.1 ± 0.9 FW | |||
| Fruits | LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; January 2009 | 17.10 ± 1.21 FW | |||
| Fruits | LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; January 2009 | 4.45 ± 0.05 FW | |||
| Fruits | LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; January 2009 Spain; February 2010 | 18.13 ± 2.24 FW 114.5 ± 3.7 FW | |||
| Fruits | LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; January and February 2009 | 8.0 ± 1.3 FW | |||
| Fruits | LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; January 2009 Spain; February 2010 | 14.2 ± 0.7 FW 14.0 ± 2.5 FW | |||
| Fruits | LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; January and February 2009 | 7.73 ± 1.22 FW | |||
| Fruits | LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; February 2010 | 13.6 ± 2.5 FW | |||
| Fruits | LC-MS; LC-FD | Spain; February 2010 | 50.1 ± 6.7 FW | |||
| Fruits | UHPLC-MS/MS | Spain | 0.64 FW 7.47 DW | |||
| Fruits | UHPLC-MS/MS | Spain | 14.77 FW 249.98 DW | |||
| Not specified | Fruits | LC-MS/MS | Germany | 0.03 ± 0.01 DW | ||
| Turnip | Roots | GC-MS | Egypt | 0.50 FW | ||
| Vetch | Seeds | RIA | – | 1.91 ± 0.11 DW | ||
| White mustard | Seeds | HPLC/MS | – | 189 DW |
FW, fresh weight; DW, dry weight; WW, wet weight; DAF, day after flowering.
Effects of exogenous melatonin on the preservation and quality of post-harvest fruits.
| Common name | Scientific name | Melatonin treatment concentration (µM) | Optimum concentration (µM) | Treatment time | Treatment method | Effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple | 100; 200; 300; 400 | 200 | 6; 12; 24; 48; 72; 96; 120 h | Immersed | Gray mold ↓ | ||
| Banana | 0; 50; 200; 500 | 200; 500 | 2 h | Soaked | Post-harvest banana ripening ↓ | ||
| Peach | 0; 100 | 100 | 10 min | Immersed | Senescence ↓; quality of peach fruit ↑ | ||
| 0; 100 | 100 | 10 min | Immersed | Chilling induced flesh browning ↓ | |||
| 0; 50; 100; 200 | 100 | 120 min | Immersed | Chilling injury ↓; extractable juice rate and total soluble solids ↑; polyamine, GABA and proline ↑ | |||
| 0; 100 | 100 | 2 h | Immersed | Chilling injury ↓; early stage H2O2 ↑; expression of antioxidant response genes ↑ | |||
| Strawberry | 0; 1;10; 100; 1,000 | 100 | 2 h | Immersed | H2O2 accumulation ↑; SOD activity ↑; CAT and APX activities ↓; decay ↓ | ||
| 0; 1; 10; 100; 1,000 | 100; 1,000 | 2 h | Immersed | Senescence ↓ | |||
| Lychee | 50; 100; 200; 400; 800 | 400 | 5 min | Immersed | Pericarp browning ↓; discoloration during storage ↓; membrane relative leakage rate ↓; O2-, H2O2 and MDA ↓ | ||
| Pear | 1; 100 | 100 | 12 h | Immersed | Mature senescence ↓; shelf-lives ↑; water soaking ↓; core browning ↓ |
↓ indicated decrease; ↑ indicated increase.
GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; APX, ascorbate peroxidase; O2, superoxide radical; MDA, malondialdehyde.
Effects of exogenous melatonin on the preservation and quality of post-harvest vegetables.
| Common name | Scientific name | Melatonin treatment concentration (µM) | Optimum concentration (µM) | Treatment time | Treatment method | Effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cucumber | 0; 50; 100; 500 | 500 | 2 h | Immersed | Decrease of chlorophyll, vitamin C, the content of titration-acid and soluble protein ↓ | ||
| Cassava | 100 | 100 | 2 h | Soaked | PPD ↓; H2O2 content ↓; activities of CAT and POD during the PPD process ↑ | ||
| 500 | 500 | 2 h | Incubated | SOD and CAT activities during PPD progression ↑ | |||
| Broccoli | 0; 100 | 100 | 5 min | Immersed | Storage life ↑ | ||
| Tomato | 50 | 50 | 2 h | Immersed | Fruit ripening ↑; anthocyanin accumulation↑ | ||
| 0; 1; 50; 100; 500 | 50 | 2 h | Immersed | Lycopene levels ↑; the expression level of PSY1 and CRTISO ↑; fruit softening ↑; ethylene production ↑; water-soluble pectin ↑; protopectin ↓ | |||
| Potato | 0; 1,000; 3,000; 6,000; 8,000; 10,000 | 10,000 | 12 h | Sprayed | Potato late blight ↓ |
↓ indicated decrease; ↑ indicated increase.
PPD, post-harvest physiological deterioration; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; CAT, catalase; POD: peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; PSY1, phytoene synthase1; CRTISO, carotenoid isomerase.
Figure 1Model of exogenous melatonin-mediated post-harvest preservation mechanism in fruits and vegetables. (1) Blue lines and arrows indicate ROS elimination pathway. Melatonin acts psrimarily as a powerful free radical scavenger by increasing the content of antioxidant enzymes, non-enzymatic antioxidants, and the enzymes related to oxidative protein repair, removing excess active oxygen from post-harvest fruits and vegetables, and promoting GABA shunt pathway. Subsequently, the content of hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen peroxide decreases, the degree of membrane lipid peroxidation is reduced, thus protecting cells from oxidative damage and prolonging the shelf-life. (2) Green lines and arrows indicate pathogen response dependent pathway. Exogenous melatonin increases the levels of JA and SA, triggers plant pathogen responses, increases pathogen resistance, and extends the shelf life. (3) Orange lines and arrows indicate post-harvest decay of fruits and vegetables. Diseases or senescence of post-harvest fruits and vegetables produce lots of ROS, lead to lipid peroxidation, and cause post-harvest decay. Red arrows indicate increased levels of each component.