| Literature DB >> 31736862 |
Laura Navarro Cantó1, Sara Carratalá Boscá2, Carmen Alcalá Vicente3, Sara Gil-Perontín2, Francisco Pérez-Miralles3, Jessica Castillo Villalba2, Laura Cubas Nuñez2, Bonaventura Casanova Estruch3.
Abstract
Background and objective: Chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuritis (CRION) is one of the more common phenotypes related to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Abs). The absence of specific biomarkers makes distinguishing between CRION and relapsing inflammatory ON (RION) difficult. A recent work has suggested a widespread affectation of the central nervous system in CRION patients. In order to search for a potential CRION marker we have measured brain atrophy in a cohort of patients, stratified by phenotypes: CRION, RION, multiple sclerosis with a history of optic neuritis (MS-ON), and MOG-Abs status.Entities:
Keywords: CRION; anti-MOG antibodies; biomarker; brain atrophy; optic neuritis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31736862 PMCID: PMC6838209 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1MOG-IgG antibodies detected by cell-based assay (CBA). HEK-293A cells expressing human full-length MOG-GFP (green) (a) following addition of MOG-IgG-positive RON serum sample (b) and negative MS serum sample (c) (titer of 1:160). MOG-IgG antibodies were visualized using a Cy3-conjugated goat anti-human IgG antibody (red). Images are shown in 20× (upper panel) and 100× (lower panel) magnification.
Comparison among CRION, RION, and MS-ON patients.
| 7 | 11 | 13 | |||
| 5:2 | 6:5 | 11:2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
| Mean ±SD (min–max) | 29.8 ± 13.7 (20.3–55.6) | 30.2 ± 13.9 (7.6–56) | 30.9 ± 5.4 (24–39) | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| Mean ± SD | 8.5 ± 6.1 | 10.4 ± 7.2 | 12 ± 4 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| Median (range) | 6.70 (1.6–17.3) | 9.3 (4.3–30.4) | 10.3 (7.5–20.2) | ||
| Median (range) | 9 (2–81.3) | 14 (1.25–98.8) | 11 (1.7–231) | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| Mean ± SD | 4.4 ± 3.4 | 3.1 ± 2.2 | 1.8 ± 0.7 | 0.5 | |
| Median (range) | 4 (1–11) | 2 (1–9) | 2 (1–3) | ||
| 6 (85.7) | 5 (45.5) | 2 (15.3) | 0.1 | ||
| 6 (85.7) | 11 (100) | 9 (69) | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
| 7 (100) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Mean ± SD | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.069 | |
| Median (range) | 0.5 (0.1–0.6) | 0.6 (0.3–0.8) | 0.7 (0.3–1) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | ||
| Median (range) | 0.5 (0.1–0.7) | 0.8 (0.6–1) | 1 (0.6–1) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 2 ± 0.8 | 1 ± 0.7 | 2.6 ± 1.5 | 0.4 | |
| Median (range) | 2 (1–3) | 1 (0–2) | 2.5 (0–5.5) | ||
| 1 (14.3) | 1 (9.1) | 12 (92.3) | 0.6 | ||
| 4 (57.1) | 1 (9.1) | 0 | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | |
| 4 (57.1) | 0 | 0 | |||
| 0 | 2 (18.2) | 13 (100) | 0.4 | ||
| 0 | 2 (18.2) | 6 (46.2) | 0.4 | ||
| Mean ± SD | 2.2 ± 1.1 | 0.5 ± 0.9 | 2 ± 1.4 | 0.6 | |
| Median (range) | 2 (1–4) | 0 (0–3) | 2 (1–4) | ||
| 4 (57.1) | 2 (18.2) | 9 (69.2) | 0.1 | 0.4 | |
| None | 3 (42.9) | 9 (81.8) | 1 (7.7) | ||
| AZA | 1 (9.1) | ||||
| MFM | 1 (14.2) | ||||
| RTX | 3 (42.8) | 1 (9.1) | |||
| Any DMT | 12 (92.3) | ||||
Fisher exact test.
n, number; SD, standard deviation; F, female; M, male; y, years; m, months; ON, optic neuritis; BON, bilateral optic neuritis; VA, visual acuity; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; OCB, oligoclonal bands; AQP4-Ab, aquaporin-4 antibody; MOG-Ab, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody; AZA, azathioprine; MFM, mycophenolate mofetil; RTX, rituximab; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulins; DMT, disease-modifying treatment; NA, not applicable. Values in bold when p < 0.05.
Volumetric parameters.
| Median (range) | 38 (20–57) | 34 (14–64) | 45 (33–71) | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| Mean ± SD | 70.6 ± 3.4 | 75.3 ± 3.4 | 71.4 ± 2.7 | 0.8 | |
| Mean ± SD | 1,098.1 ± 39.3 | 1,232.7 ± 184.8 | 1,080.1 ± 127.2 | 0.2 | 0.056 |
| Mean ± SD | 434.9 ± 48.2 | 471.8 ± 75 | 439.3 ± 64.4 | 0.3 | 1 |
| Mean ± SD | 14.4 ± 1.4 | 15.4 ± 2.6 | 13.5 ± 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
M, months; BPF, brain parenchymal fraction; TCV, total cerebral volume; TCGMV, total cortical gray matter volume; TV, thalamic volume. Values in bold when p < 0.05.
Figure 2Differences in BPF among CRION, RION, and MS-ON patients (Mann-Whitney U test).
Clinical and radiological characteristics of MOG-ON patients.
| 1 | F | 25 | 11 (1) | Yes | CRION | At onset: Optic nerve with gadolinium enhancement n | 3 | 2 | IVMP |
| 2 | M | 55 | 2 (2) | Yes | CRION | At onset: Optic nerve edema with gadolinium enhancement | 5 | 3 | IVMP + PLEX |
| 3 | F | 29 | 3 (1) | No | RION | At onset: Normal | 3 | 1 | IVMP |
| 4 | F | 20 | 5 (1) | Yes | CRION | At onset: Normal | 4 | 2 | IVMP |
| 5 | F | 20 | 1 (0) | Yes | CRION | At onset: Optic nerve with gadolinium enhancement | 5 | 2 | IVMP |
M, male; F, Female; BON, bilateral optic neuritis; VFSS, visual functional system score; FU, follow up; IVMP, intravenous methylprednisolone; AZA, azathioprine; MFM, mycophenolate mofetil; RTX, rituximab.
| Laura Navarro | Hospital General Universitario de Elche | Author | Designed and conceptualized study; analyzed the data; drafted the manuscript |
| Sara Carratalá | Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe de València | Author | Acquisitioned volumetric data |
| Carmen Alcalá | Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe de València | Author | Assisted data acquisition and reviewed the manuscript. |
| Sara Gil-Perontín | Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe de València | Author | Assisted data acquisition and reviewed the manuscript. |
| Francisco Perez-Miralles | Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe de València | Author | Assisted data acquisition and reviewed the manuscript. |
| Jéssica Castillo | Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe de València | Author | Acquisitioned laboratory data |
| Laura Cubas | Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe de València | Author | Acquisitioned laboratory data |
| Bonaventura Casanova | Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe de València | Author | Study supervision, interpretation, drafting, and reviewing the manuscript |
LN conceptualized and designed the work. PN, LM, FM, MK, CS, NM, MP, MS, and PB-N acquisitioned, analyzed, or interpreted data for the work. PN, MP, MS, and PB-N drafted the work. All authors were involved in the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.