Literature DB >> 31735298

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Assessing Tumor Response to Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors: Melanoma and Beyond.

Rodney J Hicks1, Amir Iravani2, Shahneen Sandhu3.   

Abstract

The complexity of the immune response and diversity of targets challenges conventional conceptual frameworks used in selecting and monitoring treatment with immune check-point inhibitors. The limitations of anatomic imaging in assessing response have been recognized. Varying patterns of response have been recognized. These patterns have different implications for the continuation and duration of therapy. Evidence supporting the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as a prognostic biomarker and in characterizing response is presented. An added benefit of this approach is the ability to detect immune-related inflammatory reactions, often in advance of severe or life-threatening clinical manifestations.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; FDG; Immunotherapy; Melanoma; Non-small cell lung cancer; PET/CT; Therapeutic monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31735298     DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2019.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PET Clin        ISSN: 1556-8598


  7 in total

Review 1.  The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting or monitoring immunotherapy response in patients with metastatic melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Narjess Ayati; Ramin Sadeghi; Zahra Kiamanesh; Sze Ting Lee; S Rasoul Zakavi; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Evaluating response to immunotherapy with 18F-FDG PET/CT: where do we stand?

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Michel De Pontdeville; Egesta Lopci
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Test-retest repeatability and interobserver variation of healthy tissue metabolism using 18F-FDG PET/CT of the thorax among lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Afnan A Malaih; Joel T Dunn; Lotte Nygård; David G Kovacs; Flemming L Andersen; Sally F Barrington; Barbara M Fischer
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 1.698

Review 4.  PET/CT variants and pitfalls in malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Amir Iravani; Kevin Prigent; Diane Kottler; Ramin Alipour; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  Joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM practice guidelines/procedure standards on recommended use of [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging during immunomodulatory treatments in patients with solid tumors version 1.0.

Authors:  E Lopci; R J Hicks; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; L Dercle; A Iravani; R D Seban; C Sachpekidis; O Humbert; O Gheysens; A W J M Glaudemans; W Weber; R L Wahl; A M Scott; N Pandit-Taskar; N Aide
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Malignancy Rate of Indeterminate Findings on FDG-PET/CT in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Ken Kudura; Florentia Dimitriou; Daniela Mihic-Probst; Urs J Muehlematter; Tim Kutzker; Lucas Basler; Robert Förster; Reinhard Dummer; Joanna Mangana; Lars Husmann; Irene A Burger; Michael Christoph Kreissl
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-15

Review 7.  The utility of pharmacological and radiological interventions to optimize diagnostic information from PET/CT.

Authors:  David Dudoignon; David A Pattison; Damien Legallois; Rodney J Hicks; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.909

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.