| Literature DB >> 31734834 |
Danuta Kosik-Bogacka1, Natalia Osten-Sacken2,3, Natalia Łanocha-Arendarczyk4, Karolina Kot4, Bogumiła Pilarczyk5, Agnieszka Tomza-Marciniak5, Joanna Podlasińska6, Mateusz Chmielarz4, Mike Heddergott7, Alain C Frantz7, Peter Steinbach8.
Abstract
This study examined the concentration of total mercury (THg) and selenium (Se), as well as the molar ratio of Se:THg in hair samples of terrestrial animals. THg and Se concentrations were measured from the hair of raccoons (Procyon lotor) and European wildcats (Felis s. silvestris) from Germany and Luxembourg. Median THg concentrations in hair from raccoons and wildcats were 0.369 and 0.273 mg kg-1 dry weight (dw), respectively. Se concentrations were higher in the hair of raccoons than of wildcats (0.851 and 0.641 mg kg-1 dw, respectively). Total mercury concentration in hair of raccoons from Luxembourg was almost 5× higher that found in hair of raccoons from Germany; however, Se concentration was similar. Thus, molar ratio of Se:THg was ~4× higher in the hair of raccoons from Germany than those from Luxembourg. Significant negative correlation was found between THg concentration and Se:THg molar ratio in both wildcats and raccoons.Entities:
Keywords: European wildcat; Hair; Raccoon; Selenium; Total mercury
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31734834 PMCID: PMC6987061 DOI: 10.1007/s10646-019-02120-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecotoxicology ISSN: 0963-9292 Impact factor: 2.823
Fig. 1Geographic distribution of the samples from European wildcats (Felis s. silvestris) in Luxembourg and raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Luxembourg and Germany. a Luxembourg. Wildcat (black circle): 1 = Mamer; 2 = Garnich; 3 = Rombach; 4 = Bous; 5 = Hoscheid; 6 = Angelsberg; 7 = Koedange; 8 Medernach; 9 Bour; 10 = Rippweiler; 11 Kopstal; 12 = Buderscheid; 13 = Esch/Alzette; 14 = Dippach; 15 = Rossmillen. Raccoon (white circle): 16 = Tarchamps; 17 = Bech; 18 = Winsler; 19 = Junglister; 20 = Marnach; 21 = Roedt; 22 = Bastendorf. b Germany. 1 = Mücka; 2 = City of Kassel; 3 = Geislingen an der Stiege
The total mercury (THg) and selenium (Se) concentrations and Se:THg molar ratio in the hair of raccoons and wildcats from Germany and Luxembourg (AM arithmetic mean, Med median, SD standard deviation, U-Mann–Whitney U test, p-level of significance, NS non-significant difference, THg and Se concentration are expressed in mg kg−1 dw, molar concentration in brackets)
| THg | Se | Se:THg | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raccoons | Total ( | AM ± SD | 1.512 ± 1.731 (0.006 ± 0.009) | 0.840 ± 0.276 (0.012 ± 0.003) | 6.600 ± 5.908 |
| Med | 0.369 (0.002) | 0.851 (0.011) | 5.324 | ||
| Range | 0.098–7.461 (0.000–0.037) | 0.386–1.498 (0.005–0.019) | 0.351–24.160 | ||
| Germany ( | AM ± SD | 0.483 ± 0.704 (0.002 ± 0.004) | 0.802 ± 0.321 (0.013 ± 0.004) | 8.936 ± 6.080 | |
| Med | 0.221 (0.001) | 0.747 (0.009) | 7.630 | ||
| Range | 0.098–2.805 (0.000–0.014) | 0.386–1.498 (0.005–0.019) | 0.416–24.160 | ||
| Luxembourg ( | AM ± SD | 2.358 ± 2.353 (0.012 ± 0.012) | 0.930 ± 0.147 (0.012 ± 0.002) | 2.395 ± 2.076 | |
| Med | 1.508 (0.008) | 0.922 (0.012) | 1.967 | ||
| Range | 0.394–7.461 (0.002–0.037) | 0.674–1.120 (0.009–0.014) | 0.351–6.233 | ||
| Wildcats | Luxembourg ( | AM ± SD | 0.685 ± 1.007 (0.003 ± 0.005) | 0.678 ± 0.189 (0.009 ± 0.002) | 10.979 ± 14.743 |
| Med | 0.273 (0.001) | 0.641 (0.008) | 4.037 | ||
| Range | 0.035–3.669 (0.000–0.018) | 0.338–1.026 (0.004–0.013) | 0.427–49.735 | ||
| Raccoon vs. wildcats | NS | NS | |||
| Raccoon: Germany vs. Luxembourg | NS | ||||
The total mercury (THg) and selenium (Se) concentrations and Se:THg molar ratio in hair of wildcat and raccoons according to the gender of animals (AM arithmetic mean, Med median, SD standard deviation, U-Mann–Whitney U test, p-level of significance, NS non-significant difference; THg and Se concentration are expressed in mg kg−1 dw; molar concentration in brackets)
| THg | Se | Se:THg | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raccoon | Male ( | AM ± SD | 1.667 ± 2.331 (0.008 ± 0.012) | 0.803 ± 0.323 (0.010 ± 0.004) | 5.289 ± 5.244 |
| Med | 0.412 (0.002) | 0.771 (0.010) | 4.831 | ||
| Range | 0.127–7.461 (0.001–0.037) | 0.386–1.498 (0.005–0.019) | 0.351–18.974 | ||
| Female ( | AM ± SD | 0.706 ± 0.812 (0.004 ± 0.004) | 0.887 ± 0.232 (0.011 ± 0.003) | 7.736 ± 6.385 | |
| Med | 0.344 (0.002) | 0.877 (0.011) | 6.233 | ||
| Range | 0.098–2.805 (0.000–0.014) | 0.459–1.272 (0.006–0.016) | 0.416–24.160 | ||
| M vs. F | NS | NS | NS | ||
| Wildcat | Male ( | AM ± SD | 0.600 ± 0.708 (0.003 ± 0.004) | 0.689 ± 0.235 (0.009 ± 0.003) | 6.036 ± 4.719 |
| Med | 0.273 (0.001) | 0.642 (0.008) | 4.037 | ||
| Range | 0.124–2.196 (0.001–0.011) | 0.338–1.026 (0.004–0.013) | 1.026–15.480 | ||
| Female ( | AM ± SD | 0.812 ± 1.416 (0.004 ± 0.007) | 0.661 ± 0.105 (0.008 ± 0.001) | 18.394 ± 21.518 | |
| Med | 0.296 (0.001) | 0.647 (0.008) | 8.166 | ||
| Range | 0.035–3.669 (0.000–0.018) | 0.509–0.788 (0.006–0.010) | 0.427–49.735 | ||
| M vs. F | NS | NS | NS |
Comparison of mercury (Hg) and selenium (Se) concentration in hair of raccoons (Procyon lotor), Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra), river otter (Lontra canadensis), giant otther (Pteronura brasilensis), mink (Neovison vison), muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus), jaguar (Panthera onca), cats (Felis s. catus), golden jackal (Canis aureus), red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) collected in different regions of the world (n number of samples, dw dry weight, ww wet weight, ad adults, imm immature, M male, F female)
| Species | Diet | Localization | Hg concentration | Se concentration | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terrestrial and omnivorous | ||||||
| Raccoons ( | 10 | ~44% mammals, 26% fish and frogs, 12% invertebrates, 2% plant material (Drygala et al. | Emory River embayment of Watts Bar Reservoir in east Tennessee, USA unexposed to coal fly ash | 0.3 mg kg−1 ww | 2.85 mg kg−1 ww | Souza et al. |
| 10 | Exposed to coal fly ash in 2009 | 0.36 mg kg−1 ww | 3.25 mg kg−1 ww | |||
| 10 | Exposed to coal fly ash in 2010 | 0.47 mg kg−1 ww | 4.55 mg kg−1 ww | |||
| 8 | Kesterson Reservoir, California, USA (Se contaminated irrigation drainwater) | 28.3 mg kg−1 dw | Clark et al. | |||
| 4 | Volta Wildlife Area, California, USA | 0.93 mg kg−1 dw | ||||
| 14 | U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site Steel Creek delta | 1.65 mg kg−1 dw | Lord et al. | |||
| 18 | Upper three runs | 1.49 mg kg−1 dw | ||||
| 20 | Pond B | 0.89 mg kg−1 dw | ||||
| 16 | Ash basins | 1.00 mg kg−1 dw | ||||
| 24 | Offsite | 0.65 mg kg−1 dw | ||||
| 11 | South Florida, USA | 10.6 mg kg−1 ww | Porcella et al. | |||
| Semiaquatic and piscivorous | ||||||
| Eurasian otter ( | 36 | Seasonally up to 98% fish, 1.2% amphibians (Krawczyk et al. | UK | 18.75 mg kg−1 dw | Mason et al. | |
| River otter ( | 27 | Fish, crayfish, frogs, crabs, birds, eggs (Day et al. | Wisconsin Northern zone | 7.05 l µg g−1 ww | Strom | |
| 35 | Central zone | 6.04 l µg g−1 ww | ||||
| 20 | Southern zone | 3.40 l µg g−1 ww | ||||
| 41 | South-Central Ontario, Canada | 78.6 mg kg−1 ww | Evans et al. | |||
| 18 | Herschel | 10674 ng g−1 dw | Evans et al. | |||
| 9 | Harcourt | 9202 ng g−1 dw | ||||
| 12 | Cardiff | 8866 ng g−1 dw | ||||
| 13 | Wallbridge | 9718 ng g−1 dw | ||||
| 55 | Ware Co. | 25.55 mg kg−1 ww | Halbrook et al. | |||
| 36 | Echols Co. | 22.95 mg kg−1 ww | ||||
| 34 | Piedmont | 15.24 mg kg−1 ww | ||||
| 3 | Piedmont | 15.9 mg kg−1 dw | Cumbie | |||
| 6 | Lower Coastal Plain of Georgia | 37.6 mg kg−1 dw | ||||
| 33 | Central Saskatchewan, Canada | 9.68 mg kg−1 ww | Wilkie et al. | |||
| 71 | Ontario, Canada | 7.9 mg kg−1 dw | Klenavic et al. | |||
| 80 | Québec, Canada | 16.0 mg kg−1 dw | ||||
| 48 | Nova Scotia, Canada | 38.0 mg kg−1 dw | ||||
| Giant otter ( | 2 | Manly fish, rarely mammals, amphibians, reptiles, birds, crustaceans (Carter and Rosas | Rio Negro River, Brasil | 2.94–3.68 mg kg−1 dw | Dias Fonseca et al. | |
| Mink ( | 1 | Seasonally up to 62% fish, 56% mammals, 4-16% birds (Barrat et al. | South Saskatchewan River, Canada | 34.9 mg kg−1 dw | Wobeser and Swift | |
| 19 | South-Central Ontario, Canada | 75.0 mg kg−1 ww | Evans et al. | |||
| 25 | Ontario, Canada | 7.4 mg kg−1 dw | Klenavic et al. | |||
| 54 | Québec, Canada | 24.0 mg kg−1 dw | ||||
| 65 | Nova Scotia, Canada | 24.0 mg kg−1 dw | ||||
| 1 | U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation, USA | 104.0 mg kg−1 dw | Stevens et al. | |||
| 3 | Bear Creek | 11.0 mg kg−1 dw | ||||
| 1 | White Oak Creek | 8.8 mg kg−1 dw | ||||
| 7 | Reference sites | 5.15 mg kg−1 dw | ||||
| 5 | Piedmont | 10.7 mg kg−1 dw | Cumbie | |||
| 2 | Lower Coastal Plain of Georgia | |||||
| Terrestrial and carnivorous | ||||||
| Jaguar ( | 9 | 87% mammals, 9.8% reptiles, 2.8 birds (Garla et al. | Pantanal, Centralwestern Brazil; gold mining | 673 mg kg−1 dw | May Júnior et al. | |
| References area | 29.7 mg kg−1 dw | |||||
| Cats ( | Fish | Minamata District, Japan | 45.9 mg kg−1 dw | Kitamura | ||
| Golden jackal ( | 21 | 42.7% mammals, 12.0% birds, 27.3% plants, 18.0% insects (Giannatos et al. | Mazandaran Province, Iran | 178.3 ng g−1 dw | Malvandi et al. | |
| Red fox ( | 200 | Seasonally up to 60% small mammals, 21% carrion, ~ 20% birds, up to 26% plant material (Goldyn et al. | Kuskokwim River, Alaska | 2.58 mg kg−1 dw | Dainowski et al. | |
| Arctic fox ( | Small rodents 54.7%, reindeer 13.3%, hare 12%, birds 9.8%, vegetation 9.5%, other 0.6% (Strand et al. | Mednyi Island, Russia | 10.42 mg kg−1 dw | Bocharova et al. | ||
| 7 (M, imm.) | Iceland | 3.22 mg kg−1 ww | Treu et al. | |||
| 5 (F, imm.) | 5.09 mg kg−1 ww | |||||
| 15 (M, ad.) | 10.15 mg kg−1 ww | |||||
| 8 (F, ad.) | 9.70 mg kg−1 ww | |||||
When we start to analyze the results of individual species in the table and their several degrees of contamination with heavy metals we can recognize distinct differences as well relationships. One of them is variance in Hg level between raccoon, which is an omnivorous species and semiaquatic species, like otter or grand otter. The results show clearly, that the bigger share of fish and water animals in the food is connected to higher percentage of Hg deposition in tissues of several predators. Also the results measured by cats in Japan preying on fish confirm the assumption. Raccoon, as omnivorous species in lower risk to be highly contaminated, but also this depends from the specific place. And so we can observe, that in areas with ash basins and coal fly ash even terrestrial individuals or animals hunting in high percentage on mammals can be laden with heavy metals. Similar results were observed in jaguar in Pantanal, what stays in connection to gold mining. When we also consider the results from Mednyi Island we can see several examples of contamination with Hg. The island belongs to Kamchatka, which main industries is although fishing and forestry, but also coal and other raw materials are extracted. It could be an explanation for the evidence of partial contamination in foxes, which avoid fish but despite this show in their foraging similarities to raccoons, and proofs that in Hg contaminated areas also terrestrial organism can be higher laden with this element. Some percentage of Hg contamination we can see also in Iceland. Although Iceland is not very industry country, but carnivores living there prey on birds eating fish and on this way can Hg contained in water get to into their bodies. Island lays in the straight line about 1200 km from Greenland, where iron, uranium, aluminium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, titanium and copper are mined (Nordic Labour Journal 2011; Guidelines for the Evaluation of Petroleum Reserves and Resources 2013).
Due to lack of Se results by other species we can observe similar relationships on example of raccoon. Also in this case higher tissues contamination can be connected to higher environmental and water pollution, like in Kesterson Reservoir, California,. Due to several investigations raccoons prey frequently in ¼ on fish, in which bodies heavy metals can be deposited