J O Okeme1, V H Arrandale2,3. 1. Occupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, 525 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M6G 2L3, Canada. 2. Occupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, 525 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M6G 2L3, Canada. victoria.arrandale@utoronto.ca. 3. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada, 223 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1R4, Canada. victoria.arrandale@utoronto.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Electronic waste (e-waste) is a global public health challenge. E-waste recycling workers may be exposed to chemical, physical, ergonomic, and psychosocial hazards. This review provides an overview of recent research on occupational exposures in e-waste recycling and work-related health effects that can impact e-waste workers. RECENT FINDINGS: E-waste workers are exposed to a variety of chemicals including metals, particulates, persistent organic compounds, and flame retardants. Exposure varies according to job task with higher exposures observed for dismantling and burning e-waste. Exposure to job stress and physical hazards (e.g., noise) also occurs. Many studies have measured workers' exposure in the e-waste recycling industry; fewer have investigated health effects. Biological measures were reported more often than external exposure measures. In order to protect workers, efforts are required to better understand exposures and their health effects. Removing hazardous materials from electronic equipment and reducing e-waste production would benefit workers, communities, and the environment.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Electronic waste (e-waste) is a global public health challenge. E-waste recycling workers may be exposed to chemical, physical, ergonomic, and psychosocial hazards. This review provides an overview of recent research on occupational exposures in e-waste recycling and work-related health effects that can impact e-waste workers. RECENT FINDINGS: E-waste workers are exposed to a variety of chemicals including metals, particulates, persistent organic compounds, and flame retardants. Exposure varies according to job task with higher exposures observed for dismantling and burning e-waste. Exposure to job stress and physical hazards (e.g., noise) also occurs. Many studies have measured workers' exposure in the e-waste recycling industry; fewer have investigated health effects. Biological measures were reported more often than external exposure measures. In order to protect workers, efforts are required to better understand exposures and their health effects. Removing hazardous materials from electronic equipment and reducing e-waste production would benefit workers, communities, and the environment.
Authors: Qian Wang; An M He; Bo Gao; Lan Chen; Qiang Z Yu; Huan Guo; Bin J Shi; Pu Jiang; Zeng Y Zhang; Ping L Li; Ying G Sheng; Mo J Fu; Chun T Wu; Min X Chen; Jing Yuan Journal: J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.269
Authors: Anita Asamoah; David Kofi Essumang; Jens Muff; Sergey V Kucheryavskiy; Erik Gydesen Søgaard Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2017-09-25 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Yong Ho Kim; Barbara Wyrzykowska-Ceradini; Abderrahmane Touati; Q Todd Krantz; Janice A Dye; William P Linak; Brian Gullett; M Ian Gilmour Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Stine Eriksen Hammer; Stephen L Dorn; Emmanuel Dartey; Balázs Berlinger; Yngvar Thomassen; Dag G Ellingsen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Paul T J Scheepers; Radu Corneliu Duca; Karen S Galea; Lode Godderis; Emilie Hardy; Lisbeth E Knudsen; Elizabeth Leese; Henriqueta Louro; Selma Mahiout; Sophie Ndaw; Katrien Poels; Simo P Porras; Maria J Silva; Ana Maria Tavares; Jelle Verdonck; Susana Viegas; Tiina Santonen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-09 Impact factor: 3.390