Literature DB >> 31734614

Ecosystem services research in mountainous regions: A systematic literature review on current knowledge and research gaps.

Wondimagegn Mengist1, Teshome Soromessa2, Gudina Legese2.   

Abstract

Mountain ecosystem services (MES) can provide a wide range of benefits for human well-being, including provisioning, regulating, supporting and cultural services. This systematic review work analyzed existed knowledge and research gaps on MES at the global level. The study used databases of science direct, Scopus and google scholar using searching, appraisal, synthesis, and analysis (SALSA) framework. Using specific keywords for the searching engine, the number of publications linked with MES were about 1252 which published between 1992 and June 2019. But, only 74 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The analysis highlighted the existence of gaps in the literature including case studies from a limited geographical areas, focus on regulating and provisioning services, and lack of studies that explore the kinds of interlink between ecosystem services, and occurrence of limitation linked with data and methodology. From the 74 publications used for analysis, only seven of them were addressed mainly trade-offs and synergies, but most of them focus on quantification, qualification and economic valuation of the services. From the total case studies, the services addressed were summed up to 317 services, and the services such as climate regulation, food and fodder, fresh water, recreation and ecotourism, and erosion regulation studied more. On the contrary, photosynthesis, ornamental resources, net primary production, disease regulation, genetic resources, water purification and waste treatments were the least studied. Therefore, future research works should focus on mountainous areas of no and least studied of its ecosystem services. Critical studies are also required that indicate the link between a human being with MES, the trade-offs and synergies between MES and the influence of human beings on the quality and accessibility of ecosystem services. Besides, priority should be given by researches for methodological development and proposing management option for the mountain ecosystem and resource.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gaps; Mountain ecosystem; Mountain ecosystem services; Systematic literature review; Trade-offs and synergies

Year:  2019        PMID: 31734614     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

1.  A synthesis and future research directions for tropical mountain ecosystem restoration.

Authors:  Tina Christmann; Imma Oliveras Menor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Impact of stigma and stigma-focused interventions on screening and treatment outcomes in cancer patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth O Akin-Odanye; Anisah J Husman
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-10-25

3.  Think globally, measure locally: The MIREN standardized protocol for monitoring plant species distributions along elevation gradients.

Authors:  Sylvia Haider; Jonas J Lembrechts; Keith McDougall; Aníbal Pauchard; Jake M Alexander; Agustina Barros; Lohengrin A Cavieres; Irfan Rashid; Lisa J Rew; Alla Aleksanyan; José R Arévalo; Valeria Aschero; Chelsea Chisholm; V Ralph Clark; Jan Clavel; Curtis Daehler; Pervaiz A Dar; Hansjörg Dietz; Romina D Dimarco; Peter Edwards; Franz Essl; Eduardo Fuentes-Lillo; Antoine Guisan; Onalenna Gwate; Anna L Hargreaves; Gabi Jakobs; Alejandra Jiménez; Paul Kardol; Christoph Kueffer; Christian Larson; Jonathan Lenoir; Bernd Lenzner; Miguel A Padrón Mederos; Maritza Mihoc; Ann Milbau; John W Morgan; Jana Müllerová; Bridgett J Naylor; Ivan Nijs; Martin A Nuñez; Rüdiger Otto; Niels Preuk; Amanda Ratier Backes; Zafar A Reshi; Sabine B Rumpf; Verónica Sandoya; Mellesa Schroder; Karina L Speziale; Davnah Urbach; Graciela Valencia; Vigdis Vandvik; Michaela Vitková; Tom Vorstenbosch; Tom W N Walker; Neville Walsh; Genevieve Wright; Shengwei Zong; Tim Seipel
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 4.  Human-Terrestrial Wildlife Conflict in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Getahun Shanko; Bekele Tona
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2022-08-29

5.  Energy-space concept for the transition to a low-carbon energy society.

Authors:  Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene; Dalia Streimikiene; Giulio Paolo Agnusdei; Tomas Balezentis
Journal:  Environ Dev Sustain       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.080

6.  Research on the Optimal Allocation of Ecological Land from the Perspective of Human Needs-Taking Hechi City, Guangxi as an Example.

Authors:  Jingheng Wang; Yecui Hu; Rong Song; Wei Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.