| Literature DB >> 31734507 |
Laura E Vossen1, Daniel Červený2, Oly Sen Sarma3, Per-Ove Thörnqvist3, Fredrik Jutfelt4, Jerker Fick5, Tomas Brodin6, Svante Winberg3.
Abstract
Pollution by psychoactive pharmaceuticals has been found to disrupt anti-predator behaviors of wild fish. The challenge is now to identify which of the many psychoactive drugs pose the greatest threat. One strategy is to screen for behavioral effects of selected pharmaceuticals using a single, widely available fish species such as zebrafish. Here, we show that although such high-throughput behavioral screening might facilitate comparisons between pharmaceuticals, the choice of strain is essential. While wild-caught zebrafish exposed to concentrations of the anxiolytic drug oxazepam as low as 0.57 μg L-1 showed a reduction in the response to conspecific alarm pheromone, laboratory strain AB did not respond to the alarm cue, and consequently, the anxiolytic effect of oxazepam could not be measured. Adaptation to the laboratory environment may have rendered laboratory strains unfit for use in some ecotoxicological and pharmacological studies, since the results might not translate to wild fish populations.Entities:
Keywords: Benzodiazepines; Domestication; GABA; Oxazepam; Pharmaceutical pollution; Schreckstoff
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31734507 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134701
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963