Literature DB >> 31734397

Increased auditory stimulus intensity results in an earlier and faster rise in corticospinal excitability.

Laura St Germain1, Victoria Smith1, Dana Maslovat2, Anthony Carlsen3.   

Abstract

Increasing the intensity of auditory stimuli has been shown to produce faster simple reaction times (RTs). Typical explanations for this effect involve earlier detection of the more intense stimulus; however, these explanations fail to consider how stimulus intensity may impact response initiation processing. To investigate the mechanism responsible for the auditory stimulus intensity effect, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied at various times during the simple RT interval (equivalent to 0, 30, 45, 60, and 75% of baseline RT) to examine changes in corticospinal excitability after a go-signal of varying intensity (60, 70, 80, or 90 dB). Premotor RT data confirmed a stimulus intensity effect whereby the 90 dB stimulus resulted in faster RTs than all other intensities. Analysis of motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude elicited by TMS across stimulus intensity conditions revealed that in the 80 dB and 90 dB conditions, corticospinal excitability began to increase earlier from baseline (pre-stimulus) levels, supporting the detection hypothesis. In addition, MEP amplitude increased at a greater rate during the RT interval for the 90 dB condition, indicative of impacts on response initiation. These results indicate that stimulus intensity effects result from a combination of earlier detection and faster initiation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Neural activation; Response initiation; Simple reaction time; Stimulus detection; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31734397     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  3 in total

Review 1.  Sprint Start Regulation in Athletics: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Matthieu Milloz; Kevin Hayes; Andrew J Harrison
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The Extrastriate Body Area and identity processing: An fMRI guided TMS study.

Authors:  Alizée Pann; Mireille Bonnard; Olivier Felician; Patricia Romaiguère
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-04

3.  Self-prioritization with unisensory and multisensory stimuli in a matching task.

Authors:  Clea Desebrock; Charles Spence; Ayla Barutchu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.