Mark Khoury1, Michael Tolentino1, Zak Haj-Ahmad2, Courtney Lilek3, Madelyn P Law4. 1. Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada. 2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Niagara Health, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada. 4. Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: mlaw@brocku.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inappropriate diagnostic imaging is a burgeoning problem within the Canadian healthcare system and imposes considerable burdens to efficiency and timeliness of care. Low back pain and headaches affect an immense portion of the general population and have become exceedingly common complaints from patients seeking diagnostic imaging from primary care physicians. METHODS: A total of 399 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) requisitions for lumbar and head scans were reviewed and assessed for appropriateness in concordance with published Choosing Wisely guidelines for head and lumbar diagnostic imaging. Requisitions were classified as appropriate, inappropriate, or incomplete. Baseline data collection showed 51.6% appropriateness, 12.0% inappropriateness, and 36.3% incompleteness. New patient-centered referral forms containing evidence-based red flags by Choosing Wisely Canada were created for head and lumbar MRI and CT. The aim was to increase awareness and consideration of the guidelines during the referral process. The new referrals were distributed among 149 local family physicians in addition to information pamphlets summarizing the need to reduce unnecessary diagnostic imaging for head and lower back pain. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: After collection and review of 251 requisitions in the postintervention period, incomplete referrals dropped from 36.3% to 13.15%. Despite insignificant changes in appropriateness, it is promising that the intervention educated local physicians on the information required to complete the CT or MRI forms as further evidence is provided showing the efficacy of the patient-centered referrals. This study provides insight on the importance of appropriate diagnostic imaging and what methods can be used at the primary care level.
BACKGROUND: Inappropriate diagnostic imaging is a burgeoning problem within the Canadian healthcare system and imposes considerable burdens to efficiency and timeliness of care. Low back pain and headaches affect an immense portion of the general population and have become exceedingly common complaints from patients seeking diagnostic imaging from primary care physicians. METHODS: A total of 399 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) requisitions for lumbar and head scans were reviewed and assessed for appropriateness in concordance with published Choosing Wisely guidelines for head and lumbar diagnostic imaging. Requisitions were classified as appropriate, inappropriate, or incomplete. Baseline data collection showed 51.6% appropriateness, 12.0% inappropriateness, and 36.3% incompleteness. New patient-centered referral forms containing evidence-based red flags by Choosing Wisely Canada were created for head and lumbar MRI and CT. The aim was to increase awareness and consideration of the guidelines during the referral process. The new referrals were distributed among 149 local family physicians in addition to information pamphlets summarizing the need to reduce unnecessary diagnostic imaging for head and lower back pain. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: After collection and review of 251 requisitions in the postintervention period, incomplete referrals dropped from 36.3% to 13.15%. Despite insignificant changes in appropriateness, it is promising that the intervention educated local physicians on the information required to complete the CT or MRI forms as further evidence is provided showing the efficacy of the patient-centered referrals. This study provides insight on the importance of appropriate diagnostic imaging and what methods can be used at the primary care level.
Authors: Janet E Squires; Danielle Cho-Young; Laura D Aloisio; Robert Bell; Stephen Bornstein; Susan E Brien; Simon Decary; Melissa Demery Varin; Mark Dobrow; Carole A Estabrooks; Ian D Graham; Megan Greenough; Doris Grinspun; Michael Hillmer; Tanya Horsley; Jiale Hu; Alan Katz; Christina Krause; John Lavis; Wendy Levinson; Adrian Levy; Michelina Mancuso; Steve Morgan; Letitia Nadalin-Penno; Andrew Neuner; Tamara Rader; Wilmer J Santos; Gary Teare; Joshua Tepper; Amanda Vandyk; Michael Wilson; Jeremy M Grimshaw Journal: CMAJ Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 16.859
Authors: Maryam Madani Larijani; Amir Azizian; Tracey Carr; Scott J Adams; Gary Groot Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2021-08-28 Impact factor: 2.038