Literature DB >> 31733881

Airway and transpulmonary driving pressures and mechanical powers selected by INTELLiVENT-ASV in passive, mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

Jean-Michel Arnal1, Mathieu Saoli2, Aude Garnero2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Driving pressure (ΔP) and mechanical power (MP) are predictors of the risk of ventilation- induced lung injuries (VILI) in mechanically ventilated patients. INTELLiVENT-ASV® is a closed-loop ventilation mode that automatically adjusts respiratory rate and tidal volume, according to the patient's respiratory mechanics.
OBJECTIVES: This prospective observational study investigated ΔP and MP (and also transpulmonary ΔP (ΔPL) and MP (MPL) for a subgroup of patients) delivered by INTELLiVENT-ASV.
METHODS: Adult patients admitted to the ICU were included if they were sedated and met the criteria for a single lung condition (normal lungs, COPD, or ARDS). INTELLiVENT-ASV was used with default target settings. If PEEP was above 16 cmH2O, the recruitment strategy used transpulmonary pressure as a reference, and ΔPL and MPL were computed. Measurements were made once for each patient.
RESULTS: Of the 255 patients included, 98 patients were classified as normal-lungs, 28 as COPD, and 129 as ARDS patients. The median ΔP was 8 (7 - 10), 10 (8 - 12), and 9 (8 - 11) cmH2O for normal-lungs, COPD, and ARDS patients, respectively. The median MP was 9.1 (4.9 - 13.5), 11.8 (8.6 - 16.5), and 8.8 (5.6 - 13.8) J/min for normal-lungs, COPD, and ARDS patients, respectively. For the 19 patients managed with transpulmonary pressure ΔPL was 6 (4 - 7) cmH2O and MPL was 3.6 (3.1 - 4.4) J/min.
CONCLUSIONS: In this short term observation study, INTELLiVENT-ASV selected ΔP and MP considered in safe ranges for lung protection. In a subgroup of ARDS patients, the combination of a recruitment strategy and INTELLiVENT-ASV resulted in an apparently safe ΔPL and MPL.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Driving pressure; Mechanical power; Mechanical ventilation; Transpulmonary pressure

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31733881     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  4 in total

1.  Efficacy of adaptive ventilation support combined with lung recruitment maneuvering for acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Jiandong Zhang; Zhihao Yang; Kun Chen; Xinbo Zhang; Tianhao Zhao; Xiang Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Influence of mechanical power and its components on mechanical ventilation in SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Claudio Luciano Franck; Gustavo Maysonnave Franck
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun

3.  Automated vs. conventional ventilation in the ICU: a randomized controlled crossover trial comparing blood oxygen saturation during daily nursing procedures (I-NURSING).

Authors:  Jonathan Chelly; Sandie Mazerand; Sebastien Jochmans; Claire-Marie Weyer; Franck Pourcine; Olivier Ellrodt; Nathalie Thieulot-Rolin; Jean Serbource-Goguel; Oumar Sy; Ly Van Phach Vong; Mehran Monchi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Closed-Loop Versus Conventional Mechanical Ventilation in COVID-19 ARDS.

Authors:  Pedro David Wendel Garcia; Daniel Andrea Hofmaenner; Silvio D Brugger; Claudio T Acevedo; Jan Bartussek; Giovanni Camen; Patrick Raphael Bader; Gregor Bruellmann; Johannes Kattner; Christoph Ganter; Reto Andreas Schuepbach; Philipp Karl Buehler
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.510

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.