Literature DB >> 31733748

Commentary: Statistical significance and clinical significance - A call to consider patient reported outcome measures, effect size, confidence interval and minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

Michael Fleischmann1, Brett Vaughan2.   

Abstract

In healthcare research an intervention may be statistically significant based on quantitative analysis; however, simultaneously it may be relatively insignificant to the health or quality of life of patients affected by a particular condition or disease being treated by the intervention - thus may be interpreted as having low clinical significance. An understanding of statistics is fundamental for evidence informed healthcare. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) direct patients to evaluate aspects of their own health, including quality of life, disability and function. Data obtained from PROMs can be used to demonstrate the impact of healthcare interventions on these elements of a person's quality of life. To interpret outcome measure data for clinical decision making, a clinician must understand the concepts of statistical significance and clinical significance. This commentary explores the concepts of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), their statistical and clinical significance, and explores their relationship with a practical example for the clinician. Limitations of research that only reports p-values and the need to consider effect size, confidence intervals, and minimal clinically important difference are also discussed. Together, these concepts can assist the clinician to evaluate whether an intervention may be suitable for their clinical practice. Crown
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical practice; Evidence based practice; Measurement; Methodology; Outcomes; Statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31733748     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bodyw Mov Ther        ISSN: 1360-8592


  6 in total

1.  Clinical and patient-centered implementation outcomes of mHealth interventions for type 2 diabetes in low-and-middle income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Moses Mokaya; Florence Kyallo; Roman Vangoitsenhoven; Christophe Matthys
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.457

2.  Non-disease specific patient-reported outcome measures of health-related quality of life in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review of current research and practice.

Authors:  Justyna Młyńczyk; Paweł Abramowicz; Maciej K Stawicki; Jerzy Konstantynowicz
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Gabapentin has Longer-Term Efficacy for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: A Systematic Review and Pilot Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiu-Mei Fan; Yi-Feng Ren; Xi Fu; Hao Wu; Xin Ye; Yi-Fang Jiang; Feng-Ming You
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2021-10-04

4.  Improvements in clinical signs of Parkinson's disease using photobiomodulation: a prospective proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Ann Liebert; Brian Bicknell; E-Liisa Laakso; Gillian Heller; Parastoo Jalilitabaei; Sharon Tilley; John Mitrofanis; Hosen Kiat
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.474

5.  Preterm birth and nativity among Black women with gestational diabetes in California, 2013-2017: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Karen A Scott; Brittany D Chambers; Rebecca J Baer; Kelli K Ryckman; Monica R McLemore; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  P-value and effect-size in clinical and experimental studies.

Authors:  Anna Carolina Miola; Hélio Amante Miot
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2021-07-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.