Literature DB >> 31733395

Long-Term Comparison of Health Care Utilization and Reoperation Rates in Patients Undergoing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease.

Chitra Kumar1, Nicholas Dietz2, Mayur Sharma2, Dengzhi Wang2, Beatrice Ugiliweneza2, Maxwell Boakye2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thus study was a retrospective cohort analysis. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been the gold-standard procedure for single-level degenerative disc disease (DDD). Recently, cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become increasingly prevalent as an alternative intervention.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term costs and reoperation rates associated with CDA and ACDF for the treatment of single-level DDD.
METHODS: In the present study, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis using the MarketScan database of patients who underwent either ACDF or CDA between 2007 and 2011 and had 5 years postsurgery follow-up. Outcomes related to the health care utilization, cost, and reoperation were analyzed after propensity score matching (PSM).
RESULTS: Of 12,434 patients, 12,099 underwent ACDF and 335 CDA. Length of hospital stay and initial hospitalization cost was higher after ACDF compared with CDA. More patients undergoing CDA had early physical therapy compared with patients undergoing ACDF (CDA 30.15% vs. ACDF 22.39%; P = 0.0176). Five years after surgery, there was no significant difference in overall payments between patients undergoing ACDF and patients undergoing CDA. Reoperation rates were comparable at 5 years after the index procedure (CDA 8.06% vs. ACDF 9.25%; P = 0.5862). Patients who underwent ACDF showed decreased use of tramadol after surgery (15.09% before surgery vs. 9.55% after surgery; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in health care utilization between ACDF and CDA procedures for DDD 5 years after surgery. Also, there was no difference in reoperation rates during the study period. ACDF resulted in significant reduction in overall opioid use after versus before procedure.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACDF; CDA; Reoperation; Single-level degenerative disc disease; Utilization

Year:  2019        PMID: 31733395     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  5 in total

1.  Chiropractic Care of a Female Veteran After Cervical Total Disk Replacement: A Case Report.

Authors:  Michael Mortenson; Anna Montgomery; Glenn Buttermann
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2022-06-09

2.  What is a better value for your time? Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Austen David Katz; Junho Song; Daniel Bowles; Terence Ng; Eric Neufeld; Sayyida Hasan; Dean Perfetti; Nipun Sodhi; David Essig; Jeff Silber; Sohrab Virk
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-09-14

3.  Hybrid Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Short-Term Complications, Reoperations, and Readmissions.

Authors:  Venkat Boddapati; Nathan J Lee; Justin Mathew; Meghana M Vulapalli; Joseph M Lombardi; Marc D Dyrszka; Zeeshan M Sardar; Ronald A Lehman; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-07-24

4.  Revision Anterior Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A National Analysis of the Associated Indications, Procedures, and Postoperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Nathan J Lee; Andrei F Joaquim; Venkat Boddapati; Justin Mathew; Paul Park; Jun S Kim; Zeeshan M Sardar; Ronald A Lehman; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-01-19

5.  Comparison of the Safety of Outpatient Cervical Disc Replacement With Inpatient Cervical Disc Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Yang Meng; Hao Liu; Ying Hong; Beiyu Wang; Chen Ding; Yi Yang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.