Yunwen Hou1, Guanying Feng1, Wen Lin1, Ruixia Wang2, Hua Yuan3,4. 1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University, 140 Hanzhong Rd., Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China. 2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University, 140 Hanzhong Rd., Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China. riebett@sina.com. 3. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University, 140 Hanzhong Rd., Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China. yuanhua@njmu.edu.cn. 4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. yuanhua@njmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and location of retromolar canal (RMC) in an eastern Chinese population using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. METHODS: Six hundred and fifty-seven patients (276 males and 381 females, 19-49 years old) from east China were enrolled. Both right and left sides of the mandible were examined (n = 1314). Two-dimensional (2D) images of various planes in the mandibular ramus region and reconstructed three-dimensional (3D) images were reviewed. The course of the RMC and the location of the retromolar foramina (RMF) were observed. RESULTS: Retromolar canal (RMC) was observed in 25.9% (170/657) of patients and 15.7% of sides (206/1314). 20.4% patients had unilateral RMC (134/657) and 5.5% had bilaterally RMC (36/657). Most RMC are horizontally curved course (Type B, 45.6%), followed by vertically curved course (Type A, 44.2%). Type C RMC, which run independently from separate foramina in the mandibular ramus, were relatively rare (10.2%). The distance from the middle of the RMF to the distal end of the second molar ranged from 4.56 to 24.01 mm and the mean distance was 11.97 mm. CONCLUSION: RMC is not a rare anatomical structure in the eastern Chinese population. CBCT should be applied as a diagnostic tool to provide detailed information involving the retromolar area.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and location of retromolar canal (RMC) in an eastern Chinese population using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. METHODS: Six hundred and fifty-seven patients (276 males and 381 females, 19-49 years old) from east China were enrolled. Both right and left sides of the mandible were examined (n = 1314). Two-dimensional (2D) images of various planes in the mandibular ramus region and reconstructed three-dimensional (3D) images were reviewed. The course of the RMC and the location of the retromolar foramina (RMF) were observed. RESULTS: Retromolar canal (RMC) was observed in 25.9% (170/657) of patients and 15.7% of sides (206/1314). 20.4% patients had unilateral RMC (134/657) and 5.5% had bilaterally RMC (36/657). Most RMC are horizontally curved course (Type B, 45.6%), followed by vertically curved course (Type A, 44.2%). Type C RMC, which run independently from separate foramina in the mandibular ramus, were relatively rare (10.2%). The distance from the middle of the RMF to the distal end of the second molar ranged from 4.56 to 24.01 mm and the mean distance was 11.97 mm. CONCLUSION: RMC is not a rare anatomical structure in the eastern Chinese population. CBCT should be applied as a diagnostic tool to provide detailed information involving the retromolar area.