Literature DB >> 31732549

Assessing Protein Sequence Database Suitability Using De Novo Sequencing.

Richard S Johnson1, Brian C Searle2,3, Brook L Nunn4, Jason M Gilmore4, Molly Phillips5,6, Chris T Amemiya6, Michelle Heck7, Michael J MacCoss4.   

Abstract

The analysis of samples from unsequenced and/or understudied species as well as samples where the proteome is derived from multiple organisms poses two key questions. The first is whether the proteomic data obtained from an unusual sample type even contains peptide tandem mass spectra. The second question is whether an appropriate protein sequence database is available for proteomic searches. We describe the use of automated de novo sequencing for evaluating both the quality of a collection of tandem mass spectra and the suitability of a given protein sequence database for searching that data. Applications of this method include the proteome analysis of closely related species, metaproteomics, and proteomics of extinct organisms.
© 2020 Johnson et al.

Keywords:  Algorithms; Caenorhabditis elegans; data evaluation; de novo sequencing; mass spectrometry; metaproteomics; peptides*; protein identification; quality control and metrics; sequencing ms; tandem mass spectrometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31732549      PMCID: PMC6944239          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.TIR119.001752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  27 in total

1.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search.

Authors:  Andrew Keller; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Eugene Kolker; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  De novo sequencing and homology searching.

Authors:  Bin Ma; Richard Johnson
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Tangible benefits of the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum genome sequencing for aphid proteomics: Enhancements in protein identification and data validation for homology-based proteomics.

Authors:  M Cilia; C Tamborindeguy; M Rolland; K Howe; T W Thannhauser; S Gray
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.354

4.  Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a Middle Pleistocene cave bear reconstructed from ultrashort DNA fragments.

Authors:  Jesse Dabney; Michael Knapp; Isabelle Glocke; Marie-Theres Gansauge; Antje Weihmann; Birgit Nickel; Cristina Valdiosera; Nuria García; Svante Pääbo; Juan-Luis Arsuaga; Matthias Meyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genomic sequencing of Pleistocene cave bears.

Authors:  James P Noonan; Michael Hofreiter; Doug Smith; James R Priest; Nadin Rohland; Gernot Rabeder; Johannes Krause; J Chris Detter; Svante Pääbo; Edward M Rubin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  A guided tour of the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline.

Authors:  Eric W Deutsch; Luis Mendoza; David Shteynberg; Terry Farrah; Henry Lam; Natalie Tasman; Zhi Sun; Erik Nilsson; Brian Pratt; Bryan Prazen; Jimmy K Eng; Daniel B Martin; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Novor: real-time peptide de novo sequencing software.

Authors:  Bin Ma
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Improved annotation of the insect vector of citrus greening disease: biocuration by a diverse genomics community.

Authors:  Surya Saha; Prashant S Hosmani; Krystal Villalobos-Ayala; Sherry Miller; Teresa Shippy; Mirella Flores; Andrew Rosendale; Chris Cordola; Tracey Bell; Hannah Mann; Gabe DeAvila; Daniel DeAvila; Zachary Moore; Kyle Buller; Kathryn Ciolkevich; Samantha Nandyal; Robert Mahoney; Joshua Van Voorhis; Megan Dunlevy; David Farrow; David Hunter; Taylar Morgan; Kayla Shore; Victoria Guzman; Allison Izsak; Danielle E Dixon; Andrew Cridge; Liliana Cano; Xiaolong Cao; Haobo Jiang; Nan Leng; Shannon Johnson; Brandi L Cantarel; Stephen Richards; Adam English; Robert G Shatters; Chris Childers; Mei-Ju Chen; Wayne Hunter; Michelle Cilia; Lukas A Mueller; Monica Munoz-Torres; David Nelson; Monica F Poelchau; Joshua B Benoit; Helen Wiersma-Koch; Tom D'Elia; Susan J Brown
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Protein interaction networks at the host-microbe interface in Diaphorina citri, the insect vector of the citrus greening pathogen.

Authors:  J S Ramsey; J D Chavez; R Johnson; S Hosseinzadeh; J E Mahoney; J P Mohr; F Robison; X Zhong; D G Hall; M MacCoss; J Bruce; M Cilia
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data.

Authors:  Yasset Perez-Riverol; Attila Csordas; Jingwen Bai; Manuel Bernal-Llinares; Suresh Hewapathirana; Deepti J Kundu; Avinash Inuganti; Johannes Griss; Gerhard Mayer; Martin Eisenacher; Enrique Pérez; Julian Uszkoreit; Julianus Pfeuffer; Timo Sachsenberg; Sule Yilmaz; Shivani Tiwary; Jürgen Cox; Enrique Audain; Mathias Walzer; Andrew F Jarnuczak; Tobias Ternent; Alvis Brazma; Juan Antonio Vizcaíno
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  Proteomics in Non-model Organisms: A New Analytical Frontier.

Authors:  Michelle Heck; Benjamin A Neely
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  CIDer: A Statistical Framework for Interpreting Differences in CID and HCD Fragmentation.

Authors:  Damien B Wilburn; Alicia L Richards; Danielle L Swaney; Brian C Searle
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.466

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.