Literature DB >> 31732280

Measurement invariance of assessments of depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) across sex, strata and linguistic backgrounds in a European-wide sample of patients after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Ali Teymoori1, Ruben Real2, Anastasia Gorbunova2, E F Haghish2, Nada Andelic3, Lindsay Wilson4, Thomas Asendorf5, David Menon6, Nicole von Steinbüchel2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) are two widely used instruments to screen patients for depression and anxiety. Comparable psychometric properties across different demographic and linguistic groups are necessary for multiple group comparison and international research on depression and anxiety. OBJECTIVES AND
METHOD: We examine measurement invariance for the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 by: (a) the sex of the participants, (b) recruitment stratum, and (c) linguistic background. This study is based on non-randomized observational data six months after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) that were collected in 18 countries. We used multiple methods to detect Differential Item Functioning (DIF) including Item Response Theory, logistic regression, and the Mantel-Haenszel method.
RESULTS: At the 6-month post-injury, 2137 (738 [34.5%] women) participants completed the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 questionnaires: 885 [41.4%] patients were primarily admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), 805 [37.7%] were admitted to hospital ward, and 447 [20.9%] were evaluated in the Emergency Room and discharged. Results supported the invariance of PHQ-9 and GAD-7 across sex, patient strata and linguistic background. For different strata three PHQ-9 items and one GAD-7 item and for different linguistic groups only two GAD-7 items were flagged as showing differences in two out of four DIF tests. However, the magnitude of the DIF effect was negligible. LIMITATION: Despite high number of participants from ICU, patients have mostly mild TBI.
CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate adequate psychometric properties for PHQ-9 and GAD-7, allowing direct multigroup comparison across sex, strata, and linguistic background.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; Depression; Differential Item Functioning (DIF); Measurement invariance

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31732280     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  16 in total

1.  Appraisal Bias and Emotion Dispositions Are Risk Factors for Depression and Generalized Anxiety: Empirical Evidence.

Authors:  Klaus R Scherer; Marco Costa; Pio Ricci-Bitti; Valérie-Anne Ryser
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-04

2.  Prevalence of mental health problems and associated risk factors among military healthcare workers in specialized COVID-19 hospitals in Wuhan, China: A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Xiao Pan; Ying Xiao; Ding Ren; Zheng-Mei Xu; Qian Zhang; Li-Ying Yang; Fen Liu; Yu-Shi Hao; Feng Zhao; Yong-Hai Bai
Journal:  Asia Pac Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  The residents' mental health status and community's role during the COVID-19 pandemic: a community-based cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Simin Li; Zhiyu Ye; Chunping Du; Quan Wei; Chengqi He
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10

4.  Psychometric Characteristics of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Applied in the CENTER-TBI Study.

Authors:  Nicole von Steinbuechel; Katrin Rauen; Fabian Bockhop; Amra Covic; Ugne Krenz; Anne Marie Plass; Katrin Cunitz; Suzanne Polinder; Lindsay Wilson; Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew I R Maas; David Menon; Yi-Jhen Wu; Marina Zeldovich
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Factorial Structure and Validity of Depression (PHQ-9) and Anxiety (GAD-7) Scales after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Ali Teymoori; Anastasia Gorbunova; Fardzadeh E Haghish; Ruben Real; Marina Zeldovich; Yi-Jhen Wu; Suzanne Polinder; Thomas Asendorf; David Menon; Nicole V Steinbüchel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Depressive and anxiety disorders worsen the prognosis of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Xiaojun Fu; Chenxing Wu; Ning Han; Ning Liu; Song Han; Xuebin Liu; Shouwei Li; Changxiang Yan
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.682

7.  Reliability, Validity, and Measurement Invariance of the General Anxiety Disorder Scale Among Chinese Medical University Students.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Tingting Wang; Ping Zeng; Minghao Zhao; Guifang Zhang; Shuo Zhai; Lingbing Meng; Yuanyuan Wang; Deping Liu
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Impacts of COVID-19 on the Education, Life and Mental Health of Students in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Fahmida Liza Piya; Sumaiya Amin; Anik Das; Muhammad Ashad Kabir
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Predictors for successful psychotherapy: Does migration status matter?

Authors:  Friederike Kobel; Yesim Erim; Eva Morawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Value of Chinese Version GAD-7 and PHQ-9 to Screen Anxiety and Depression in Chinese Outpatients with Atypical Chest Pain.

Authors:  Qiuzhen Lin; Ousseina Bonkano; Keke Wu; Qiming Liu; Toure Ali Ibrahim; Ling Liu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.