| Literature DB >> 31731740 |
Fan Wang1,2, Hong Chen1, Cai-Hua Zhu1, Si-Rui Nan3, Yan Li1,2.
Abstract
Due to the influence of altitude change on a driver's heart rate, it is difficult to estimate driving fatigue using heart rate variability (HRV) at a road segment with frequent and rapid altitude change. Accordingly, a novel method of driving fatigue estimation for driving at plateau area with frequent altitude changes is proposed to provide active safety monitoring in real time. A naturalistic driving experiment at Qinghai-Tibet highway was conducted to collect drivers' electrocardiogram data and eye movement data. The results of the eye movement-based method were selected to enhance the HRV-based driving fatigue degree estimation method. A correction factor was proposed to correct the HRV-based method at the plateau area so that the estimation can be made via common portable devices. The correction factors for both upslope and downslope segments were estimated using the field experiment data. The results on the estimation of revised driving fatigue degree can describe the driver's fatigue status accurately for all the road segments at the plateau area with altitudes from 3540 to 4767 m. The results can provide theoretical references for the design of the devices of active safety prevention.Entities:
Keywords: Qinghai-Tibet Plateau; blinking frequency; correction factor; driving fatigue; heart rate variability; rapid altitude change
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31731740 PMCID: PMC6891775 DOI: 10.3390/s19224982
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) Layout of the experimental route; and (b) altitudes along the experimental route.
Figure 2Equipment installation in the experiment.
Figure 3The installation and data processing of the BIOPAC MP 160 data acquisition system.
Figure 4Sensors on the SMI ETG2w system and data processing interface.
Figure 5Variations in heart rate with altitude and driving duration. (a) Upslope trip and (b) downslope trip.
Figure 6Variations of DFD with altitude and driving duration of segment 2.
Figure 7Variations in blinking frequency with altitude and driving duration of segment 2.
Figure 8Variations in DFDs with altitude and driving duration of segment 1: (a) upslope road segment and (b) downslope road segment.
Figure 9Variations in correction factor δ for segment 1: (a) upslope road segment and (b) downslope road segment.
Figure 10Variations in rDFDs with altitude and driving duration of segment 1: (a) upslope road segment and (b) downslope road segment.
Significance F and F values calculated by various time intervals.
| Time Interval | 30 s | 1 min | 2 min | 3 min | 4 min | 5 min |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sig. F | 0.009 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.022 | 0.103 | 0.142 |
| F | 112.6 | 82.2 | 54.7 | 45.3 | 38.9 | 21.8 |
Results of F-test between two HRV-based algorithms and blinking frequency-based algorithm.
| Statistical Indicators | Upslope Road Segment | Downslope Road Segment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blinking-DFD | Blinking-rDFD | Blinking-DFD | Blinking-rDFD | |
| Sum of Squares | 10,447.116 | 4853.339 | 8418.968 | 4607.189 |
| F | 26.402 | 20.018 | 20.477 | 17.206 |
| Sig. F | 0.082 | 0.021 | 0.091 | 0.013 |
| R2 | 0.199 | 0.965 | 0.296 | 0.938 |
Figure 11Variations in correction factor δ with altitude of segment 2.